Find the t – test of difference of following are the measurements of the wing span of two varieties of sparrows in millimeters: Assuming that the condition underlying the two-sample t test can be met, test at the 0.05 level of significance whether the difference between the means of these two random samples is significant

Find the t – test of difference of following are the measurements of the wing span of two varieties of sparrows in millimeters: Assuming that the condition underlying the two-sample t test can be met, test at the 0.05 level of significance whether the difference between the means of these two random samples is significant

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A solar power engineer took a random sample of houses and installed the same type of solar panels using two different methods on each house to investigate whether there is a mean difference in the angles of installation between the two methods for all houses in the population of interest. The engineer found the sample mean difference between the two methods to be 0.2 degree and the p-value for a two-sided matched-pairs t-test for the mean difference to be 0.65. Assuming the conditions for inference are met, which of the following statements is the best interpretation of the p -value? (A) The probability that the null hypothesis is true is 0.65. (B) If the null hypothesis is true, the probability is 0.65 of observing a mean difference of 0.2 degree or -0.2 (C) (D) (E) degree. If the null hypothesis is true, the probability is 0.65 of observing a mean difference of greater than 0.2 degree or less than -0.2 degree. If the null hypothesis is true, the probability is 0.65 of observing a…
The corrosive effects of various soils on coated and uncoated steel pipe was tested by using a dependent sampling plan. The data collected are summarized below, where d is the amount of corrosion on the coated portion subtracted from the amount of corrosion on the uncoated portion. Does this random sample provide sufficient reason to conclude that the coating is beneficial? Use ? = 0.01 and assume normality. n = 36, Σd = 227, Σd2 = 6244(a) Find t. (Give your answer correct to two decimal places.)(ii) Find the p-value. (Give your answer correct to four decimal places.)(b) State the appropriate conclusion. Reject the null hypothesis, there is significant evidence that the coating is beneficial.Reject the null hypothesis, there is not significant evidence that the coating is beneficial. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is significant evidence that the coating is beneficial.Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is not significant evidence that the coating is beneficial.
Please answer the incorrect ones only.
You may need to use the appropriate technology to answer this question. Submitted The following table contains observed frequencies for a sample of 200. Column Variable Row Variable A B C P 20 44 50 Q 30 26 30 Test for independence of the row and column variables using a = 0.05. State the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: The column variable is independent of the row variable. H: The column variable is not independent of the row variable. Ho: Variable P is not independent of variable Q. H: Variable P is independent of variable Q. Ho: Variable P is independent of variable Q. H: Variable P is not independent of variable Q. : The column variable is not independent of the row variable. Ho: : The column variable is independent of the row variable. Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value %3D State your conclusion. Reject Ho. We conclude that the column and row variables are…
A researcher randomly assigns college freshmen to either of two experimental conditions. Because both groups consist of college freshmen, someone claims that it is appropriate to use a t test for the two related samples. Comments?
In the manufacture of steel rollers to fit an assembly, the external diameter is considered to be a random variable with mean equal to 23 mm and variance equal to 0.0036 cm2. 1.5 is supported standard deviations more than the mean and 3.5 standard deviations below average. A piece with a diameter below such specifications is considered waste, whereas a piece with a diameter larger than specified must be reprocessed. Which is the percentage of pieces that:to. They are being wasted.b. They need to be reprocessed.c. Acceptable.d. If you want to establish that the reprocessing is 5% of the rollers and waste of 1%, than specification limit would recommend.
Identify the IV and the scale of measurement; Identify the DV and the scale of measurement and for the IV – identify the number of levels; Identify null and alternative hypotheses, are they directional or non-directional? Assume that the distributions of the populations are approximately normal.
A researcher decides to measure anxiety in group of bullies and a group of bystanders using a 23-item, 3 point anxiety scale. Assume scores on the anxiety scales are normally distributed and the variance among the group of bullies and bystanders are the same. A group of 30 bullies scores an average of 21.5 with a sample standard deviation of 10 on the anxiety scale. A group of 27 bystanders scored an average of 25.8 with a sample standard deviation of 8 on the anxiety scale. You do not have any presupposed assumptions whether bullies or bystanders will be more anxious so you formulate the null and alternative hypothesis based on that.
An independent measures design study with n= 16 in each sample produces a sample meam difference of 4 points and a pooled variance of 24. Wht is the value of t statistic?
The human resources department of a major corporation announced that the number of people interviewed by the corporation in one month has a mean of 101 and a variance, oʻ, of 266. The management of the corporation suspects that the variance exceeds 266. A random sample of 10 months yielded a mean of 105 interviews, with a variance of 378. If we assume that the number of people interviewed by the corporation in one month follows an approximately normal distribution, is there enough evidence to conclude, at the 0.1 level of significance, that the management's claim is correct? Perform a one-tailed test. Then complete the parts below. Carry your intermediate computations to three or more decimal places and round your answers as specified below. (If necessary, consult a list of formulas.) (a) State the null hypothesis H, and the alternative hypothesis H,. p H. :0 H, :0 (b) Determine the type of test statistic to use. (Choose one) ▼ O=0 OSO (c) Find the value of the test statistic. (Round…