**Understanding Regression Analysis with Lemon Imports and Crash Fatality Rate**This exercise focuses on finding the regression equation, using the first variable as the predictor (x variable). The data provided gives us lemon imports in metric tons and the crash fatality rates per 100,000 people. Our task is to predict the crash fatality rate for a scenario where 425 metric tons of lemons are imported. We will evaluate the viability of this prediction.**Data Table:**- **Lemon Imports (in metric tons):** 226, 268, 360, 492, 518- **Crash Fatality Rate (per 100,000 people):** 16.1, 16, 15.8, 15.6, 15.1**Objective:**1. Determine the equation of the regression line.2. Predict the crash fatality rate for an import value of 425 metric tons.3. Assess whether this prediction is worthwhile.**Equation of the Regression Line:**The regression line is represented by the formula:\[\hat{y} = a + bx\]where $ \hat{y} $ is the predicted value, $ a $ is the intercept, $ b $ is the slope of the line, and $ x $ is the independent variable (lemon imports in this case).- **Instructions for Calculation:** - Round the constant $ a $ to three decimal places. - Round the coefficient $ b $ to six decimal places.**Graph/Diagram Explanation:**The graph would typically display lemon imports on the x-axis and the crash fatality rate on the y-axis. The regression line will show the relationship between these two variables, indicating whether more lemon imports seem to correlate with changes in the crash fatality rate.This educational exploration not only helps in understanding the relationship between the selected factors but also provides insight into predictive modeling, which plays a crucial role in statistical and data analysis.

Regression: The regression analysis is conducted here by using EXCEL. The software procedure is…

Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Using the listed lemon/crash data, where lemon imports are in metric tons and the fatality rates are per 100,000 people, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 425 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile? 226 268 Lemon Imports Crash Fatality Rate 16.1 16 360 15.8 492 15.6 518 O 15.1 Find the equation of the regression line. (Round the constant three decimal places as needed. Round the coefficient to six decimal places as needed.)

Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Using the listed lemon/crash data, where lemon imports are in metric tons and the fatality rates are per 100,000 people, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 425 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile? 226 268 Lemon Imports Crash Fatality Rate 16.1 16 360 15.8 492 15.6 518 O 15.1 Find the equation of the regression line. (Round the constant three decimal places as needed. Round the coefficient to six decimal places as needed.)

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Using the listed lemon/crash data, where lemon imports are in metric tons and the fatality rates are per 100,000 people, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 475 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile? 353 480 513 Lemon Imports Crash Fatality Rate 231 263 16 15.9 15.6 15.4 15 Find the equation of the regression line. (Round the y-intercept to three decimal places as needed. Round the slope to four decimal places as needed.) Clear all Check answer View an example Get more help - Help me solve this Terms of Use Privacy Policy|Copyright © 2022 Pearson Education Inc. All Rights Reserved. 16.
Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2.3 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05. Overhead Width (cm) Weight (kg) 7.8 175 7.3 9.5 274 7.4 156 9.9 294 9.2 183 256 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. ..... The regression equation is y =+x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.)
The data show the number of viewers for television stars with certain salaries. Find the regression equation, letting salary be the independent (x) variable. Find the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $7 million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.2 million? Use a significance level of 0.05. Salary (millions of $) 108 14 5 8 5.1 4.3 7.8 2.5 Viewers (millions) Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. What is the regression equation? y=+x (Round to three decimal places as needed.) X 1 1 5 8 5.7 8.2 10.9 4.4
Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted Nobel Laureate rate for a country that has 78.5Internet users per 100 people. How does it compare to the country's actual Nobel Laureate rate of 1.1 per 10 million people? Internet Users Per 100 Nobel Laureates80.3 5.679.6 24.277.3 8.644.6 0.183 6.138.3 0.190.1 25.189.1 7.680.1 8.983.3 12.753.2 1.976.6 12.756.8 3.379.5 1.591.5 11.493.7 25.465.1 3.157.8 1.967.9 1.794.3 31.785.3 31.387.7 1977.7 10.8
Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Using the listed lemon/crash data, where lemon imports are in metric tons and the fatality rates are per 100,000 people, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 525 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile? Lemon Imports 232 264 361 467 537 Crash Fatality Rate 16 15.8 15.6 15.5 15 Find the equation of the regression line. y=nothing+(nothing)x (Round the constant three decimal places as needed. Round the coefficient to six decimal places as needed.) The best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 525 metric tons of lemon imports is nothing fatalities per 100,000 population. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Is the prediction worthwhile? A. Since all of the requirements for finding the equation of the regression line are met, the prediction is…
Interpret the regression results.
Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Using the sh data, where lemon imports are in metric tons and the fatality rates are per te, ouple, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 450 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile? Question Viewer Lemon Imports 228 264 362 498 Crash Fatality Rate 16.1 16 15.8 15.5 526 15.1 Find the equation of the regression line. ŷ=+x (Round the y-intercept to three decimal places as needed. Round the slope to four decimal places as needed.)
Find the equation of the regression line for the given data. Then construct a scatter plot of the data and draw the regression line. (Each pair of variables has a significant correlation.) Then use the regression equation to predict the value of y for each of the given x-values, if meaningful. The caloric content and the sodium content (in milligrams) for 6 beef hot dogs are shown in the table below. 170 480 Calories, x Sodium, y 560 Find the regression equation. ŷ=x+ (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Choose the correct graph below. OA. 0ff 0 200 150 430 Calories 130 320 a 130 380 O B. 560 0 80 250 200 G Calories (a) Predict the value of y for x = 160. Choose the correct answer below. OA. 390.863 OB. 440.983 OC. 591.343 O D. not meaningful (b) Predict the value of y for x = 90. Choose the correct answer below. 190 510 (a) x (c) x 160 calories 140 calories O C. A 560+ 0-T 0 200 Calories (b) x = 90 calories (d) x = 220 calories OD. 560- 0 200 Calories Q
Find the regression equation, letting the diameter be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted circumference of a marble with a diameter of 1.9 cm. How does the result compare to the actual circumference of 6.0 cm? Use a significance level of 0.05. Baseball Basketball Golf Soccer Tennis Ping-Pong Volleyball 5 Diameter 7.4 23.6 4.3 21.7 7.1 3.9 21.5 Circumference 23.2 74.1 13.5 68.2 22.3 12.3 67.5
Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted Nobel Laureate rate for a country that has 79.4 Internet users per 100 people. How does it compare to the country's actual Nobel Laureate rate of 1.2 per 10 million people? Internet Users Per 100 Nobel Laureates 79.3 5.6 80.5 24.2 78.8 8.7 45.2 0.1 82.5 6.2 38 0.1 90.3 25.4 88.6 7.6 80.3 9.1 83.1 12.6 53.3 1.9 76.3 12.7 56.6 3.3 78.5 1.5 91.6 11.5 93.4 25.2 65.3 3.1 57.3 1.9 68.2 1.7 94.8 31.6 85.4 31.3 86.4 19.1 78.3 10.9 2) Check Image
Find the regression equation, letting overhead width be the predictor (x) variable. Find the best predicted weight of a seal if the overhead width measured from a photograph is 2.5 cm. Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? Use a significance level of 0.05. Overhead Width (cm) 7.6 7.4 9.8 8.8 9.3 7.3 Weight (kg) 142 163 256 188 231 156 The regression equation is y= + x. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) The best predicted weight for an overhead width of 2.5 cm is kg? (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Can the prediction be correct? What is wrong with predicting the weight in this case? A. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense. The width in this case is beyond the scope of the available sample data. B. The prediction cannot be correct because a negative weight does not make sense and because there is…
The data show the bug chirps per minute at different temperatures. Find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the independent (x) variable. Find the best predicted temperature for a time when a bug is chirping at the rate of 3000 chirps per minute. Use a significance level of 0.05. What is wrong with this predicted value? Chirps in 1 min 1118 796 1161 918 1103 1219 Temperature (F) 82 72.2 92.2 73 87.5 94.4