The data show the number of viewers for television stars with certain salaries. Find the regression equation, letting salary be the independent (x) variable. Find the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? Use a significance level of 0.05. Salary (millions of $) Viewers (millions) 101 8 8 3 12 12 8 9 5.5 7.4 6.8 4.7 5.6 6.6 2.3 9.1 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. What is the regression equation? y=+x (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million? The best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million is million. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? O A. The result is exactly the same as the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. O B. The result is not very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. OC. The result is very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. O D. The result does not make sense given the context of the data.

The data show the number of viewers for television stars with certain salaries. Find the regression equation, letting salary be the independent (x) variable. Find the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million. Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? Use a significance level of 0.05. Salary (millions of $) Viewers (millions) 101 8 8 3 12 12 8 9 5.5 7.4 6.8 4.7 5.6 6.6 2.3 9.1 Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. What is the regression equation? y=+x (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is the best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million? The best predicted number of viewers for a television star with a salary of $2 million is million. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) Is the result close to the actual number of viewers, 5.1 million? O A. The result is exactly the same as the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. O B. The result is not very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. OC. The result is very close to the actual number of viewers of 5.1 million. O D. The result does not make sense given the context of the data.

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134753119

Author:Sheldon Ross

Publisher:Sheldon Ross

Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported as y=−24.94x+53.67 and the r=−0.78What percentage of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x?r² = ______% (Report exact answer, and do not enter the % sign)
Please help.Thanks so much
The output of a another regression analysis on the effect of radio advertising spending, television advertising spending and online advertising spending on sales is given below. For this study they explored 3 different types of advertising spending (radio, television and online). They modelled it as y = ao + a1¤1+a2x2 + a3X3. The table below gives the summary output of this regression analysis. Regression Analysis: Sales versus Spend Analysis of Variance Source DF MS F-Value P-Value Regression dfreg MSR 10.00 F-val p-val Error dferr 560.58 MSE Total 38 Find the Mean Squares Error (MSE ) in the above table. Give your answer to 3 decimal places.
Help please
FAL The money raised and spent (both in millions of dollars) by all congressional campaigns for 8 recent 2-year periods are shown in the table. The equation of the regression line is y = 0.959x + 15.575. Find the coefficient of determination and interpret the result. Money raised, x Money spent, y 472.7 446.1 652.5 681.3 742.1 747.2 Find the coefficient of determination and interpret the result. 2 (Round to three decimal places as needed.) 785.7 779.4 1025.2 954.5 1207.4 1008.1 933.1 1165.1 769.1 725.3
please please help me and make answer clear!!! thanks so much
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported as y=-59.97x+67.54 and the r=-0.31 What percentage of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x? r² = % (Report exact answer, and do not enter the % sign) .
Help please!
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported as = 76.63x + 33.59 and r 0.119. What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the linear regression equation found above? Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place.
The values of advertisement expense (X) and sales (Y) are shown in the table below. Find the regression line. Estimate the value of sales when advertisement expense is 20.
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported as -36.51x+76.99 and r = -0.437. What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the linear regression equation found above? % Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place. Submit Question
Using your favorite statistics software package, you generate a scatter plot with a regression equation and correlation coefficient. The regression equation is reported as y = – 17.88x + 41.39 and the r = - 0.405. What proportion of the variation in y can be explained by the variation in the values of x? r2 = Report answer as a percentage accurate to one decimal place.