Figure: Production Possibility Frontler Curve for Tealand Scones (millons) 25 20 C 15 10 10 20 30 40 50 Tea (millions of cups) Reference: Ref 2-5 Figure: Production Possibility Frontier for Tealand (Figure: Production Possibility Frontier for Tealand) Use Figure: Production Possibility Frontier for Tealand. Tealand can produce at point E only if:

Figure: Production Possibility Frontler Curve for Tealand Scones (millons) 25 20 C 15 10 10 20 30 40 50 Tea (millions of cups) Reference: Ref 2-5 Figure: Production Possibility Frontier for Tealand (Figure: Production Possibility Frontier for Tealand) Use Figure: Production Possibility Frontier for Tealand. Tealand can produce at point E only if:

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter2: Thinking Like An Economist

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3CQQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Explain why societies cannot make a choice above their production possibilities frontier and should not make a choice below it.
Minerals 25 (millions of tons) 20 15 10 5 5 10 15 20 25 Grapes (millions of tons) Figure 1 Production possibility frontier for Highland Towards the right of Figure 1 are two circular red markers with a line between them that you can use to draw a production possibility frontier on Figure 1. You can move the markers with the mouse by clicking on them and dragging. Alternatively, you can tab to each marker and then use the keyboard arrow keys. Decide where to position the red markers based on the information below. There are two countries, called Highland and Lowland, with very different geography. They both produce grapes and dig for minerals, using only labour, with constant returns to scale. Figure 1 shows the production possibility frontier for Highland and the table shows the working population and productivity for Lowland. Working population and production possibilities Working population Production of tons of grapes per person per year Production of tons of minerals per person per…
Typed answer.
R Imagine that it costs $40 in the United States to produce one ton of soybeans and transport them to market, while it costs $30 in Brazil to produce one ton of soybeans and transport them to market Imagine that it costs $20,000 in the United States to produce one automobile and transport it to maket, while costs $10,000 in Brazil to produce one automobile and transport it to market. Which of the following four arrangements would be most efficient? (Hint: Derived OC from PPF (production) = 1/OC derived from costs to make ) a. The United States should produce everything, since it can produce both soybeans and automobiles better than Brazil can produce them. Ob. Brazil should specialize and produce only automobiles. The United States should specialize and produce only soybeans. Then the two countries should trade with each other. Brazil will send automobiles to the United States, while the United States sends soybeans to the Brazil. Oc. The United States should specialize and produce…
3. Suppose the Canada can produce cattle or corn with a given amount of resources. Below is a graphdepicting the production possibility frontier for Canada and the marginal benefit and cost of a bushel ofcorn. Discuss the relationship between the marginal cost and marginal benefit of corn and the production ofboth corn and cattle.(a) Discuss the overallocation of resources, underallocation of resources, and optimal allocation of resources. (b) When operating at the optimal level of corn production, what is the optimal level of cattle production? Whyis this the optimal amount (why not more or less cattle)?
7.
please do d and e
Draw a production possibility frontier. The vertical axis shows theproduction of public sector goods and the horizontal axis showsproduction of private sector goods. The economy is currentlyproducing at point A on the frontier where 50 per cent of allproduction is devoted to public sector goods and 50 per cent toprivate sector goods.(a) Mark the following points on your drawing.(i) Point A.(in) Point B which shows production following the election of agoverment which increases government spending on botheducation and the National Health Service.(ili) Point C where unemployment is present in the economy.(iv) Point D where the government takes over production of allgoods and services in the econory.(b) Draw another diagram putting on it the original productionpossibility Frontier you drew for (a), labelling it AA.(i) Draw a new production possibility frontier on the diagram,labelling it PP, which shows the position after a devastatingwar has hit the economy.(in) Draw another PPF…
12 Investment Figure 14.4 383.Figure 14.4 shows three possible shifts in the production possibilities frontier of a country. Which allocation would be the most likely explanation for shift number 3? (A) R (B) W (C) x (D) Y (E) Shift number 3 is not possible. LHH actment Consumption
1 Trade Suppose Cascadia has the following industry-level output (in dollars) and emissions rates (in tons of CO₂ per dollar) in 2000 and 2020. Year Industry 2000 Output Emissions Rate Output 80 300 300 250 Agriculture 50 Electricity 100 Transportation 150 Industry 200 0.16 0.2 0.26 0.3 2020 Emissions Rate 0.12 0.16 0.2 0.25 1.1 Calculate the Scale, Scale+Composition, and Scale+Composition+Technique effects 1.2 Use your answers from the previous question to explain which of the scale, com- position, and technique effects has had the largest impact on emissions growth
General questions Howshould the optimal price of carbon be set? Which alternative approaches are available and which factors determine the price of carbon?”
Q1. Draw the production possibility frontier for lowland on the graph please