(Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun) Use Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun. The figure shows the potential profits of two producers of bottled water. Each has two strategies available to it: a high price and a low price. The Nash equilibrium is: Red River High price Low price High price Yellow Sun Yellow Sun's profit= $20,000 Red River's profit $20,000 Yellow Sun's profit $12,000 Red River's profit= $50,000 Low Price Yellow Sun's profit- $50,000 Red River's profit = -$2,000 Yellow Sun's profit- $10,000 Red River's profit= $10,000 O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a high price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a high price.

(Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun) Use Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun. The figure shows the potential profits of two producers of bottled water. Each has two strategies available to it: a high price and a low price. The Nash equilibrium is: Red River High price Low price High price Yellow Sun Yellow Sun's profit= $20,000 Red River's profit $20,000 Yellow Sun's profit $12,000 Red River's profit= $50,000 Low Price Yellow Sun's profit- $50,000 Red River's profit = -$2,000 Yellow Sun's profit- $10,000 Red River's profit= $10,000 O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a high price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a high price.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Economics Alpha and Beta are the only firms selling gyros in the upscale town of Delphi. Each firm must decide on whether to offer a discount to students to compete for customers. If one firm offers a discount but the other does not then the firm that offers the discount will increase its profit. The figure shows the payoff matrix for this game. Alpha Offer Don't offer Alpha eams S60,000 Alpha eams $20,000 What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Offer Bota earns $60,000 Bota earns $100.000 O A. There is no Nash equilibrium Beta Alpha earns $100.000 Alpha earms $80,000 O B. Beta offers a student discount but Alpha does not Don't OC. Both Alpha and Beta offer a student discount Beta eams $20,000 Beta earns $80,000 offer O D. Alpha offers a student discount but Beta does not
Identify a real-world situation in which you see game theory/strategic behavior in action. Explain the game: Who are the players ? What are the strategies they have at their disposal? How are payoffs determined? What, if any, is the Nash equilibrium? Note, this article from Up Journey might help you come up with an example: https://upjourney.com/game-theory-examples-in-real-life
Question 1 Suppose the romaine lettuce industry is a Cournot duopoly with the following two firms: Amalgamated Romaine (a) and Best Romaine (b). The (inverse) market demand schedule is: p = 262 -0.5Q Amalgamated Romaine has the following cost structure: MCATC₁ = $6 Best Romaine has a different cost structure: MC₁ = ATC₁ = $8 Find the following in Cournot-Nash equilibrium. a. Output of Amalgamated Romaine = b. Output of Best Romaine = c. Cournot duopoly equilibrium price = $ units units 3 pts
Refer to the accompanying payoff matrix. Which of the following is a Nash equilibrium? Company A Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1 Company A's Profit: $8 million Company B's Profit: $9 million Company B Company A's Profit: $10 million Company B's Profit: $8 million None of the above, Strategy 2 Company B's Profit: $8 million Company A's Profit: $7 million Company B's Profit: $7 million Company A's Profit: $8 million Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 1. Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 2. Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 2. Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 1.
Consider a town in which only two residents, Eric and Ginny, own wells that produce water safe for drinking. Eric and Ginny can pump and sell as much water as they want at no cost. For them, total revenue equals profit. The following table shows the town's demand schedule for water. Note: the second picture of the last blank has 4 option A. nash equilibrium B tying c resale price maintenance D predatory pricing
Question 3 Assume we have a market with only two companies in it, Company X and Company Y. Now suppose that both companies have to choose one of two potential strategies for pricing their products: setting a low price or setting a high price. The table below shows the expected profits for each company under each pricing scenario. Assume both companies are in competition with each other and seek to maximize their profits. Under these conditions, how much profit should we expect both companies to earn? Company Y Provide your answer below: High Price Low Price High Price Profit for Company Y: $12, 975,000 Profit for Company X: $12, 975,000 Profit for Company Y: $16, 218,000 Profit for Company X: $1,946, 000 Company X Low Price Profit for Company Y: $1,946, 000 Profit for Company X: $16, 218,000 Profit for Company Y: $6,487,000 Profit for Company X: $6,487,000
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Expresso and Beantown are the only two firms that sell coffee. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Beantown Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 9, 9 15, 3 Expresso Doesn't Advertise 3, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Expresso advertises and Beantown doesn't advertise, Expresso will make a profit of $15 million, and Beantown will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Expresso and Beantown are both profit-maximizing firms. If Expresso decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Beantown advertises and a profit of $ million if Beantown does not advertise. If Expresso decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ million if Beantown advertises and a profit of $ million if Beantown does not advertise. If Beantown advertises, Expresso makes a higher profit if…
a. b. Each firm has four alternative strategies, and a certain profit/payoff is associated with each strategy. The numbers in the payoff matrix denote firm A's profit (in thousands of dollars). The total amount of profit that can be earned by the two firms together is $20000. (This is called a "constant sum game.") Firm B's profit is therefore $20000 minus firm A's profit. What strategies will the two firms select? Is the game strictly determined? If so, how much does each firm gain? B's strategies A's strategies ↓ Increase Advertising Decrease Price Increase Price Alter Product Increase Advertising 0 11 8 11 Decrease Price 8 10 6 2 Increase Price 7 12 15 Alter Product 4 15 3 12 Suppose now that due to a change in consumer preferences, firm A's "Increase Price" strategy pays off better than before when firm B elects to "Decrease Price," that is, the payoff rises from 6 to 14. What strategies will the two firms now select? Is the game strictly determined? If so, how much does each firm…
9. Little Kona is a small coffee company that is consider- ing entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: Little Kona Enter Don't Enter High Price Kona makes $2 million Kona makes zero Big Brew Brew makes $3 million Brew makes $7 million Kona loses $1 million Low Price Kona makes zero Brew makes $1 million Brew makes $2 million
6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Zipride and Citron are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell electric scooters. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for scooters. Zipride Pricing price. High Low For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Zipride prices low and Citron prices high, Zipride will earn a profit of $13 million, and Citron will earn a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Zipride and Citron are both profit-maximizing firms. Citron Pricing High 9,9 13, 3 If Zipride prices high, Citron will make more profit if it chooses a Low If the firms do not lude, 3, 13 6, 6 If Citron prices high, Zipride will make more profit if it chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low True False Both Zipride and Citron will choose a low price. strategies…
Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Creamland Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $15 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit- maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of s million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it…
(Figure: Payoff Matrix for the United States and Canada) Use Figure: Payoff Matrix for the United States and Canada. Suppose that the United States and Canada both produce quinoa, and each country can earn more profit it output is limited and the price of quinca is high. The dominant strategy for the United States is: Canada US Low output High output Low output EU profit $10 million US profit $10 million EU profit $4 million US profit $12 million High output EU profit $12 million US profit $4 million Olow output O The United States does not have a dominant strategy O adopt a fit for tal strategy O high output EU profit $7 million US profit $7 million