(Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun) Use Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun. The figure shows the potential profits of two producers of bottled water. Each has two strategies available to it: a high price and a low price. The Nash equilibrium is: Red River High price Low price High price Yellow Sun Yellow Sun's profit= $20,000 Red River's profit $20,000 Yellow Sun's profit $12,000 Red River's profit= $50,000 Low Price Yellow Sun's profit- $50,000 Red River's profit = -$2,000 Yellow Sun's profit- $10,000 Red River's profit= $10,000 O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a high price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a high price.

(Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun) Use Figure: Payoff Matrix for Red River and Yellow Sun. The figure shows the potential profits of two producers of bottled water. Each has two strategies available to it: a high price and a low price. The Nash equilibrium is: Red River High price Low price High price Yellow Sun Yellow Sun's profit= $20,000 Red River's profit $20,000 Yellow Sun's profit $12,000 Red River's profit= $50,000 Low Price Yellow Sun's profit- $50,000 Red River's profit = -$2,000 Yellow Sun's profit- $10,000 Red River's profit= $10,000 O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a high price. O Red River charges a high price, Yellow Sun charges a low price. O Red River charges a low price, Yellow Sun charges a high price.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Flashfry Pricing High Low Warmbreeze Pricing High 11, 11 15, 2 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $15 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. Low 2, 15 8,8 If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low True O False If the firms do not collude, what…
Question 1 Suppose the romaine lettuce industry is a Cournot duopoly with the following two firms: Amalgamated Romaine (a) and Best Romaine (b). The (inverse) market demand schedule is: p = 262 -0.5Q Amalgamated Romaine has the following cost structure: MCATC₁ = $6 Best Romaine has a different cost structure: MC₁ = ATC₁ = $8 Find the following in Cournot-Nash equilibrium. a. Output of Amalgamated Romaine = b. Output of Best Romaine = c. Cournot duopoly equilibrium price = $ units units 3 pts
6)Game Theory: The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Assume that the Wilson and Spalding athletic equipment companies are in a one-shot game for market share and profits, but that they have the option of choosing only one of two possible price strategies for basketballs: $20 or $80. Obviously if they choose different strategies, the firm with the lower price will win the entire market. The firms face the following payoff matrix (See Chap. 10). Wilson\ \Spalding Wilson $ 20 Price Wilson $ 80 Price Spalding $ 20 Price $ 400, $ 400 $ 1500, $ 0 Spalding $ 80 Price $ 0, $ 1500 $ 1000, $ 1000 What strategy will each firm choose? Why? Which strategy is dominant? Which strategy is preferred by each firm? What will be the outcome of the one-shot game? Where is the Nash equilibrium? Which outcome would be best for the two firms? What will happen if the game is repeated an infinite number of times?
2. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Please help
Kindly answer this one, thank you
Q:3 a,b and c
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
4. Consider the following Pricing game. Firms A and B each has two strategies: to charge Low or High price. The following table shows the payoffs for all possible outcomes: Firm B Pricing Strategy Low High Low Firm A 0,0 -200, 400 High 400, -200 100, 100 Suppose that Firms A and B are going to play this game over and over again, forever. Also, suppose both firms agree on the following collusive plan: "We will each charge the high price, provided neither of us has ever charged the low price in any previous period. If one of us cheats and charges the low price, the other player will charge the low price in every period thereafter." Answer the following questions about this infinitely repeated game:
6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Zipride and Citron are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell electric scooters. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for scooters. Zipride Pricing price. High Low For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Zipride prices low and Citron prices high, Zipride will earn a profit of $13 million, and Citron will earn a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Zipride and Citron are both profit-maximizing firms. Citron Pricing High 9,9 13, 3 If Zipride prices high, Citron will make more profit if it chooses a Low If the firms do not lude, 3, 13 6, 6 If Citron prices high, Zipride will make more profit if it chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low True False Both Zipride and Citron will choose a low price. strategies…
Macmillan Learning Big Bear and Coffeebean are coffee chains in a metro area deciding on a pricing strategy. Use the payoff matrix below to answer the questions. Assume that both firms have complete information on each other's payoff structure and that they choose their pricing strategies simultaneously. Big Bear High price Low price $6 million $3 million High price Coffeebean $6 million $8 million $8 million Low price $3 million $5 million $5 million What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? the lower right quadrant If this is a repeated game, what is one strategy the firms could employ to penalize noncooperative behavior?
2
Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Creamland Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $15 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit- maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of s million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of s million if Dairy King does not advertise. If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it…