Felipe Fernandez Armresto Columbus Villian or Hero. Write a commentary on the work. Identify the author’s argument if there is one. Discuss how the author supports their position with the evidence they cite. If the piece does not have a clear argument, discuss how the evidence used in the piece only provides information without attempting to make any larger point.

icon
Related questions
Question
Felipe Fernandez Armresto Columbus Villian or Hero. Write a commentary on the work. Identify the author’s argument if there is one. Discuss how the author supports their position with the evidence they cite. If the piece does not have a clear argument, discuss how the evidence used in the piece only provides information without attempting to make any larger point. DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT REJECT THE QUESTION PLEASE ALLOW SOMEONE ELSE TO ANSWER PLEASE AND THANK YOU. 
The sort of whom the ancients made gods': a 16th-century engraving plays up to the image of Columbus
as providential agent. A Latin inscription accompanying the picture describes him dedicating the ocean
he has discovered to the terrifying gods', and the land to the kings of Spain.
COLUMBUS – HERO OR
for taming their own wilderness
Washington Irving's perniciously in-
fluential History of the Life and
Voyages of Christopher Columbus of
1828 - which spread a lot of nonsense
including the ever-popular folly that
Columbus was derided for claiming
that the world was round - appealed
unashamedly to Americans' self-image
as promoters of civilisation.
Yet aspects of the myth are much
older - traceable to Columbus' own
times and, to a large extent, to his own
efforts. He was a loquacious and in-
defatigable self-publicist, who bored
adversaries into submission and
Felipe Fernández-Armesto weighs up the
case for and against the man of the hour and
finds a Columbus for all seasons.
his year, his statue in Barcelona
exchanged symbolic rings with
the Statue of Liberty in New
York; meanwhile, the descendants of
slaves and peons will burn his effigy. In
a dream-painting by Salvador Dali,
Columbus takes a great step for man-
kind, toga-clad and cross-bearing -
while a sail in the middle distance drips
with blood. The Columbus of tradition
to stimulate enough educational work
and research to destroy them. Instead,
the polemical atmosphere seems to be
reinforcing à parti pris positions
It is commonly said that the tradi-
tional Columbus myth - which awards
him personal credit for anything good
that ever came out of America since
T
shares a single canvas with the Col-
umbus of fashion, the culture-hero of
the western world with the bogey who
exploited his fellow-man and despoiled
his environment. Both versions are
false and, if historians had their way,
the quincentennial celebrations ought
1492 - originated in the War of Inde-
pendence, when the founding fathers,
in search of an American hero, pitched
on the Genoese weaver as the improb-
able progenitor of all-American virtues.
Joel Barlow's poem, The Vision of Col-
umbus, appeared in 1787. Columbus
remained a model for nineteenth-cen-
tury Americans, engaged in a project parts which other explorers could not
acquired a proverbial reputation for
using more paper than Ptolemy. The
image he projected was that of a provi-
dential agent, the divinely-elected
'messenger of a new heaven', chosen to
bear the light of the gospel to un-
evangelised recesses of the earth - the
MAY 1992
contumely and neglect, unrewarded by
the standard of his deserts, in a renew-
ed trial of faith.
These passages of autobiography
cannot be confirmed by the facts. The
documented length of his quest for
patronage was less than five years.
Throughout that time he built up a
powerful lobby of moral supporters at
reach. His plan for an Atlantic crossing
"God revealed to me by His manifest
hand'. Playing on his christian name, he
called himself Christo ferens' and com-
piled a book of what he said were
biblical prophecies of his own dis-
coveries. Enough contemporaries were
convinced by his gigantic self-esteem
for him to become literally a legend in
his own lifetime. To a leading astro-
logical guru at the court of Spain, he
was 'like a new apostle'. To a humanist
from Italy who taught the would-be
Renaissance men of Castile, he was 'the
sort of whom the ancients made gods
From his last years, his reputation
dipped: writers were obliged to belittle
him in the service of monarchs who
were locked in legal conflict with Col-
umbus' family over the level of reward
he had earned. Yet his own self-percep-
tion was passed on to posterity by
influential early books. Bartolomé de
Las Casas - Columbus' editor and his
to a cause; unwavering fidelity in
adversity.
The most successful promotional li-
terature is believed by its own propaga-
tors. To judge from his consistency,
Columbus believed in his own image of
himself. It is not surprising that most
readers of his works, from Las Casas
onwards, have been equally convinced.
Columbus seems to have been pre-
disposed to self-persuasion by satura-
tion in the right literary models: saints,
prophets and heroes of romance.
Despite his astonishing record of
achievement, and his impressive ac-
cumulation of earthly rewards, he had
an implacable temperament which
could never be satisfied, and an un-
remitting ambition which could never
be assuaged. Such men always think
themselves hard done by. His extra-
ordinary powers of persuasion - his
communicator's skills which won back-
for an impossible project in his
the Castilian court and financial back-
ers in the business community of Sevil-
le. His own protestations of loneliness
are usually qualified by an admission
that he was unsupported 'save for' one
or two individuals. When added
together, these form an impressive
cohort, which includes at least two
archbishops, one court astrologer, two
royal confessors, one royal treasurer
and the queen herself. In his second
supposed period of persecution, he
was an honoured figure, loaded with
titles, received at court, consulted by
Transcribed Image Text:The sort of whom the ancients made gods': a 16th-century engraving plays up to the image of Columbus as providential agent. A Latin inscription accompanying the picture describes him dedicating the ocean he has discovered to the terrifying gods', and the land to the kings of Spain. COLUMBUS – HERO OR for taming their own wilderness Washington Irving's perniciously in- fluential History of the Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus of 1828 - which spread a lot of nonsense including the ever-popular folly that Columbus was derided for claiming that the world was round - appealed unashamedly to Americans' self-image as promoters of civilisation. Yet aspects of the myth are much older - traceable to Columbus' own times and, to a large extent, to his own efforts. He was a loquacious and in- defatigable self-publicist, who bored adversaries into submission and Felipe Fernández-Armesto weighs up the case for and against the man of the hour and finds a Columbus for all seasons. his year, his statue in Barcelona exchanged symbolic rings with the Statue of Liberty in New York; meanwhile, the descendants of slaves and peons will burn his effigy. In a dream-painting by Salvador Dali, Columbus takes a great step for man- kind, toga-clad and cross-bearing - while a sail in the middle distance drips with blood. The Columbus of tradition to stimulate enough educational work and research to destroy them. Instead, the polemical atmosphere seems to be reinforcing à parti pris positions It is commonly said that the tradi- tional Columbus myth - which awards him personal credit for anything good that ever came out of America since T shares a single canvas with the Col- umbus of fashion, the culture-hero of the western world with the bogey who exploited his fellow-man and despoiled his environment. Both versions are false and, if historians had their way, the quincentennial celebrations ought 1492 - originated in the War of Inde- pendence, when the founding fathers, in search of an American hero, pitched on the Genoese weaver as the improb- able progenitor of all-American virtues. Joel Barlow's poem, The Vision of Col- umbus, appeared in 1787. Columbus remained a model for nineteenth-cen- tury Americans, engaged in a project parts which other explorers could not acquired a proverbial reputation for using more paper than Ptolemy. The image he projected was that of a provi- dential agent, the divinely-elected 'messenger of a new heaven', chosen to bear the light of the gospel to un- evangelised recesses of the earth - the MAY 1992 contumely and neglect, unrewarded by the standard of his deserts, in a renew- ed trial of faith. These passages of autobiography cannot be confirmed by the facts. The documented length of his quest for patronage was less than five years. Throughout that time he built up a powerful lobby of moral supporters at reach. His plan for an Atlantic crossing "God revealed to me by His manifest hand'. Playing on his christian name, he called himself Christo ferens' and com- piled a book of what he said were biblical prophecies of his own dis- coveries. Enough contemporaries were convinced by his gigantic self-esteem for him to become literally a legend in his own lifetime. To a leading astro- logical guru at the court of Spain, he was 'like a new apostle'. To a humanist from Italy who taught the would-be Renaissance men of Castile, he was 'the sort of whom the ancients made gods From his last years, his reputation dipped: writers were obliged to belittle him in the service of monarchs who were locked in legal conflict with Col- umbus' family over the level of reward he had earned. Yet his own self-percep- tion was passed on to posterity by influential early books. Bartolomé de Las Casas - Columbus' editor and his to a cause; unwavering fidelity in adversity. The most successful promotional li- terature is believed by its own propaga- tors. To judge from his consistency, Columbus believed in his own image of himself. It is not surprising that most readers of his works, from Las Casas onwards, have been equally convinced. Columbus seems to have been pre- disposed to self-persuasion by satura- tion in the right literary models: saints, prophets and heroes of romance. Despite his astonishing record of achievement, and his impressive ac- cumulation of earthly rewards, he had an implacable temperament which could never be satisfied, and an un- remitting ambition which could never be assuaged. Such men always think themselves hard done by. His extra- ordinary powers of persuasion - his communicator's skills which won back- for an impossible project in his the Castilian court and financial back- ers in the business community of Sevil- le. His own protestations of loneliness are usually qualified by an admission that he was unsupported 'save for' one or two individuals. When added together, these form an impressive cohort, which includes at least two archbishops, one court astrologer, two royal confessors, one royal treasurer and the queen herself. In his second supposed period of persecution, he was an honoured figure, loaded with titles, received at court, consulted by
MAY 1992
to a cause; unwavering fidelity in
adversity
The most successful promotional li-
terature is believed by its own propaga-
tors. To judge from his consistency,
Columbus believed in his own image of
himself. It is not surprising that most
readers of his works, from Las Casas
onwards, have been equally convinced.
Columbus seems to have been pre-
disposed to self-persuasion by satura-
tion in the right literary models: saints,
prophets and heroes of romance.
Despite his astonishing record of
achievement, and his impressive ac-
cumulation of earthly rewards, he had
an implacable temperament which
could never be satisfied, and an un-
remitting ambition which could never
be assuaged. Such men always think
themselves hard done by. His extra-
ordinary powers of persuasion - his
communicator's skills which won back-
ing for an impossible project in his
lifetime - have continued to win fol-
reach. His plan for an Atlantic crossing
"God revealed to me by His manifest
hand'. Playing on his christian name, he
contumely and neglect, unrewarded by
the standard of his deserts, in a renew-
ed trial of faith.
These passages of autobiography
cannot be confirmed by the facts. The
documented length of his quest for
patronage was less than five years.
Throughout that time he built up a
powerful lobby of moral supporters at
the Castilian court and financial back-
called himself Christo ferens' and com-
piled a book of what he said were
biblical prophecies of his own dis-
coveries. Enough contemporaries were
convinced by his gigantic self-esteem
for him to become literally a legend in
his own lifetime. To a leading astro-
logical guru at the court of Spain, he
was 'like a new apostle'. To a humanist
from Italy who taught the would-be
Renaissance men of Castile, he was 'the
ers in the business community of Sevil-
le. His own protestations of loneliness
are usually qualified by an admission
that he was unsupported 'save for' one
or two individuals. When added
together, these form an impressive
cohort, which includes at least two
archbishops, one court astrologer, two
royal confessors, one royal treasurer
and the queen herself. In his second
supposed period of persecution, he
was an honoured figure, loaded with
titles, received at court, consulted by
the crown and - depite his woe
begone protestations of poverty -
amply moneyed.
The explanation of the image of Col-
umbus-as-victim must be sought in his
character, not in his career. He was
what would now be called a whinger,
who relished his own misfortunes as
good copy and good theatre. When he
appeared at court in chains, or in a
friar's habit, he was playing the role of
victim for all it was worth. His written
lamentations - which cover many
folios of memoranda, supplications and
personal letters - are thick with allu-
sions to Jeremiah and Job. The notions
of patience under suffering and of
persecution for righteousness' sake fit-
ted the hagiographical model on which
much of his self-promotional writing
was based: a flash of divine enlighten-
ment; a life transformed; consecration
sort of whom the ancients made gods'.
From his last years, his reputation
dipped: writers were obliged to belittle
him in the service of monarchs who
were locked in legal conflict with Col-
umbus' family over the level of reward
he had earned. Yet his own self-percep-
tion was passed on to posterity by
influential early books. Bartolomé de
Las Casas - Columbus' editor and his-
torian - professed a major role for
himself in the apostolate of the New
World and heartily endorsed Columbus
self-evaluation as an agent of God's
purpose. Almost as important was the
Historie dell'Ammiraglio, which
claimed to be a work of filial piety and
therefore presented Columbus as an
unblemished hero, with an imputed
pedigree to match his noble soul.
Claims to having access to a divine
hot-line are by their nature unverifi-
lowers of his legend ever since his
death.
Like Columbus-the-hero, Columbus-
the-villain is also an old character in a
long literary tradition. Most of the
denunications of him written in his day
have not survived but we can judge
their tenor from surviving scraps. The
usual complaints against servants of the
Castilian crown in the period are made:
he acted arbitrarily in the administra-
tion of justice; he exceeded his powers
in enforcing his authority; he usurped
royal rights by denying appeal to con-
demned rebels; he alienated crown
property without authorisation; he
deprived privileged colonists of offices
or perquisites; he favoured his own
family or friends; he lined his pockets
at public expense. In the course of
VILLAIN?
able. Demonstrably false was the
second element in Columbus' self-
made myth: his image of tenacity in
adversity - a sort of Mein Kampf ver-
sion of his life, in which he waged a
long, lone and unremitting struggle
against the ignorance and derision of
contemporaries. This theme has
echoed through the historical tradi-
tion. That they all laughed at Christ-
opher Columbus' has been confirmed
by modern doggerel. Vast books have
been wasted in an attempt to explain
his mythical perseverance by ascribing
to him secret foreknowledge of the
BERMUDA
BAHAMAS
MEXICO
ATLANTIC
CUBA
OCEAN
ISLE OF
PINES
Sa
Domn
JAMAICA
PUERTO RICO
CAYMAN
* GUADELOUPE
is
VIRGIN Is.
HISPANIOLA
DOMINICA
existence of America. Yet almost all the
evidence which underlies it comes
HONDURAS
CARIBBEAN SEA
MARTINIQUE
NICARAGUA
straight out of Columbus' own prop-
aganda, according to which he was
isolated, ignored, victimised and perse-
cuted, usually for the numinous span of
"seven' years; then, after fulfilling his
destiny, to the great profit of his detrac-
tors he was returned to a wilderness of
Gut of Par
VENEZUELA
COSTA RICA
PANAMA
Fest Voyage (14-14 . Third voyage (14
Secend voyage (14 Foum vayage (150
PACIFIC OCEAN
The four voyages
of Columbus.
HISTORY TODAY
what seems to have been a general
campaign against Genoese employees
of the crown in the late 1490s, he was
"blamed as a foreigner' and accused of
'plotting to give the island of Hispani-
ola to the Genoese'.
Other allegations attacked his com-
petence rather than his good faith, gen-
erally with justice. It was true, for
instance, that he had selected an un-
Good PR?A woodcut
showing natives
fleeing as Columbus
approaches the New
World is careful to
include King
Ferdinand watching
from across the
occan. This is one of
several illustrations
healthy and inconvenient site for the
settlement of Hispaniola; that he had
disastrously misjudged the natives' in-
tentions in supposing them to be
peaceful; and that his proceedings had
so far alienated so many colonists th
to a letter sent by
Columbus to the
1193and ranidIY
Transcribed Image Text:MAY 1992 to a cause; unwavering fidelity in adversity The most successful promotional li- terature is believed by its own propaga- tors. To judge from his consistency, Columbus believed in his own image of himself. It is not surprising that most readers of his works, from Las Casas onwards, have been equally convinced. Columbus seems to have been pre- disposed to self-persuasion by satura- tion in the right literary models: saints, prophets and heroes of romance. Despite his astonishing record of achievement, and his impressive ac- cumulation of earthly rewards, he had an implacable temperament which could never be satisfied, and an un- remitting ambition which could never be assuaged. Such men always think themselves hard done by. His extra- ordinary powers of persuasion - his communicator's skills which won back- ing for an impossible project in his lifetime - have continued to win fol- reach. His plan for an Atlantic crossing "God revealed to me by His manifest hand'. Playing on his christian name, he contumely and neglect, unrewarded by the standard of his deserts, in a renew- ed trial of faith. These passages of autobiography cannot be confirmed by the facts. The documented length of his quest for patronage was less than five years. Throughout that time he built up a powerful lobby of moral supporters at the Castilian court and financial back- called himself Christo ferens' and com- piled a book of what he said were biblical prophecies of his own dis- coveries. Enough contemporaries were convinced by his gigantic self-esteem for him to become literally a legend in his own lifetime. To a leading astro- logical guru at the court of Spain, he was 'like a new apostle'. To a humanist from Italy who taught the would-be Renaissance men of Castile, he was 'the ers in the business community of Sevil- le. His own protestations of loneliness are usually qualified by an admission that he was unsupported 'save for' one or two individuals. When added together, these form an impressive cohort, which includes at least two archbishops, one court astrologer, two royal confessors, one royal treasurer and the queen herself. In his second supposed period of persecution, he was an honoured figure, loaded with titles, received at court, consulted by the crown and - depite his woe begone protestations of poverty - amply moneyed. The explanation of the image of Col- umbus-as-victim must be sought in his character, not in his career. He was what would now be called a whinger, who relished his own misfortunes as good copy and good theatre. When he appeared at court in chains, or in a friar's habit, he was playing the role of victim for all it was worth. His written lamentations - which cover many folios of memoranda, supplications and personal letters - are thick with allu- sions to Jeremiah and Job. The notions of patience under suffering and of persecution for righteousness' sake fit- ted the hagiographical model on which much of his self-promotional writing was based: a flash of divine enlighten- ment; a life transformed; consecration sort of whom the ancients made gods'. From his last years, his reputation dipped: writers were obliged to belittle him in the service of monarchs who were locked in legal conflict with Col- umbus' family over the level of reward he had earned. Yet his own self-percep- tion was passed on to posterity by influential early books. Bartolomé de Las Casas - Columbus' editor and his- torian - professed a major role for himself in the apostolate of the New World and heartily endorsed Columbus self-evaluation as an agent of God's purpose. Almost as important was the Historie dell'Ammiraglio, which claimed to be a work of filial piety and therefore presented Columbus as an unblemished hero, with an imputed pedigree to match his noble soul. Claims to having access to a divine hot-line are by their nature unverifi- lowers of his legend ever since his death. Like Columbus-the-hero, Columbus- the-villain is also an old character in a long literary tradition. Most of the denunications of him written in his day have not survived but we can judge their tenor from surviving scraps. The usual complaints against servants of the Castilian crown in the period are made: he acted arbitrarily in the administra- tion of justice; he exceeded his powers in enforcing his authority; he usurped royal rights by denying appeal to con- demned rebels; he alienated crown property without authorisation; he deprived privileged colonists of offices or perquisites; he favoured his own family or friends; he lined his pockets at public expense. In the course of VILLAIN? able. Demonstrably false was the second element in Columbus' self- made myth: his image of tenacity in adversity - a sort of Mein Kampf ver- sion of his life, in which he waged a long, lone and unremitting struggle against the ignorance and derision of contemporaries. This theme has echoed through the historical tradi- tion. That they all laughed at Christ- opher Columbus' has been confirmed by modern doggerel. Vast books have been wasted in an attempt to explain his mythical perseverance by ascribing to him secret foreknowledge of the BERMUDA BAHAMAS MEXICO ATLANTIC CUBA OCEAN ISLE OF PINES Sa Domn JAMAICA PUERTO RICO CAYMAN * GUADELOUPE is VIRGIN Is. HISPANIOLA DOMINICA existence of America. Yet almost all the evidence which underlies it comes HONDURAS CARIBBEAN SEA MARTINIQUE NICARAGUA straight out of Columbus' own prop- aganda, according to which he was isolated, ignored, victimised and perse- cuted, usually for the numinous span of "seven' years; then, after fulfilling his destiny, to the great profit of his detrac- tors he was returned to a wilderness of Gut of Par VENEZUELA COSTA RICA PANAMA Fest Voyage (14-14 . Third voyage (14 Secend voyage (14 Foum vayage (150 PACIFIC OCEAN The four voyages of Columbus. HISTORY TODAY what seems to have been a general campaign against Genoese employees of the crown in the late 1490s, he was "blamed as a foreigner' and accused of 'plotting to give the island of Hispani- ola to the Genoese'. Other allegations attacked his com- petence rather than his good faith, gen- erally with justice. It was true, for instance, that he had selected an un- Good PR?A woodcut showing natives fleeing as Columbus approaches the New World is careful to include King Ferdinand watching from across the occan. This is one of several illustrations healthy and inconvenient site for the settlement of Hispaniola; that he had disastrously misjudged the natives' in- tentions in supposing them to be peaceful; and that his proceedings had so far alienated so many colonists th to a letter sent by Columbus to the 1193and ranidIY
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer