Fajita Wagon: $500 Fajita Wagon: $4,000 Refer to t table above, which describes the payoffs to different pricing strategies for a duopo What set of strategies would be the Nash equilibrium for this game? The Fajita Wagon adopts a high price, and the Taco Bus adopts a high price. The Fajita Wagon earns $1,000 profit, and the Taco Bus earns $1,000 profit. The Fajita Wagon earns $4,000 profit, and the Taco Bus earns $4,000 profit.

Fajita Wagon: $500 Fajita Wagon: $4,000 Refer to t table above, which describes the payoffs to different pricing strategies for a duopo What set of strategies would be the Nash equilibrium for this game? The Fajita Wagon adopts a high price, and the Taco Bus adopts a high price. The Fajita Wagon earns $1,000 profit, and the Taco Bus earns $1,000 profit. The Fajita Wagon earns $4,000 profit, and the Taco Bus earns $4,000 profit.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two firms face decisions with two alternatives that can be modeled using Game Theory. For each of the situations described below, CIRCLE the ("Nash") equilibrium (or equilibria) for the "game" given the profit payouts (firm 1, firm 2) for the choices for the firms (or mark "None"). a. Sell One Medium-Size Item or Sell One Large Item and One Small Item Firm 1 Choices Firm 2 Choices Medium-Size Item Large and Small Items Medium-Size Item 31,27 25, 33 Large/Small Items 42,24 30,28 b. Use "9" Price Endings or Use "5" Price Endings Firm 2 Choices Use "9" Price Endings | Use "5" Price Endings Firm 1 Choices Use "9" Endings Use "5" Endings 45,28 42,30 c. Hire a Celebrity Endorser or Donate to Charity 27,25 25,28 Firm 2 Choices Firm 1 Choices Hire Celebrity Endorser Donate to Charity Celebrity Endorser 40, 29 30, 33 Donate to Charity 37,36 48, 32 d. Locate Downtown or Locate in Suburban Strip Mall Firm 2 Choices Firm 1 Choices Locate Downtown Locate in Strip Mall Locate Downtown 32,31 28, 34…
Consider the game below: Find the Nash Equilibriums of the below game
how many Nash equilibrium/equilibria are there in this game? please refer to figure provided
What is the Nash equilibrium? a) Both firms advertise. b) Both firms do not advertise c) Firm 1 advertises and Firm 2 does not. d) No Nash equilibrium for this game. e) Firm 2 advertises and Firm 1 does not. Suppose Firm 1 gets 2 instead of 4 when both firms advertise. What is the Nash equilibrium? a) Firm 1 advertises and Firm 2 does not. b) No Nash equilibrium for this game. c) Both firms advertise d) Firm 2 advertises and Firm 1 does not e)Both firms do not advertise
2: Provide a definition for a Nash equilibrium and then find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria of the following game: Left Center Right Up Middle 1,3 2,7 6,3 2,9 4,4 7,10 Down 3,8 2,5 3,4
Sam and Sarah are thinking about getting married. However if either of them cheats on the other, they would get a payoff of 10, while the other person gets zero. If neither cheat, they stay with each other and get a payoff of 7 each and if both cheat, the relationship falls apart and each get a payoff of 1. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? a. Cheat, Cheat b. Not cheat, Not cheat Sam cheats, Sarah doesn't Sarah cheats, Sam doesn't
Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Felix and Janet are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Felix chooses Right and Janet chooses Right, Felix will receive a payoff of 3 and Janet will receive a payoff of 7. Attached the table The only dominant strategy in this game is for (Janet / Felix) to choose (Left / Right). The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Felix chooses (Left / Right) and Janet chooses (Left / Right).
Up Down Player 1 in the game above, what is/are the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? (up,up) (up,down) (down, up) (down, down) No equilibrium exists Up Down Up Down Player 2 P1 gets $100 P2 gets $100 P1 gets $10 P2 gets $10 P1 gets $15 P2 gets $5 P1 gets $110 P2 gets $10
Up ооооо Down (up,up) (up,down) 3 8 (down, Player 1 up) down) No EFFICIENT equilibrium exists (down, Up Down Up In the game above, what is/are the EFFICIENT sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? Down Player 2 P1 gets $20 P2 gets $20 P1 gets $52 P2 gets $6 P1 gets $4 P2 gets $0 P1 gets $51 P2 gets $3
Dairy King Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 7,7 12, 3 Creamland Doesn't Advertise 3, 12 10, 10 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $12 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of not advertise. million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of million if Dairy King does If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of does not advertise. million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of million if Dairy King If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it chooses If Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland makes a higher profit if it chooses Suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing? ◇ Creamland will…
2. Consider the following "location game." There are two ice cream sellers (Seller 1 and Seller 2) in a small city. Residents are uniformly located on a straight street of length 1. The ice cream sellers need to choose where to set up their carts, and each resident will purchase one unit of ice cream from the nearest seller. The city council has fixed the price of the ice cream, and as a result, each seller just wants sell as much ice cream as possible. (a) We think of this "location game" as a simultaneous-move game, in which each player's payoff is the proportion of residents that buy from her cart. Is this game with discrete strategies or continuous strategies? Please state the set of (pure) strategies for both sellers. Is this game zero-sum or non-zero-sum? (b) Find all NE(s) of this game.
Two farmers have unlimited access to a common plot of land and can let their cows graze on it. The matrix below shows the benefits they get from grazing either 1 or 2+ cows on the land. Farmer 2 Farmer1 1 cow 2+ cows 1 cow 8,8 2,10 2+cows 10,2 4,4 What kind of game is this? What is/are the Nash equilibrium/equilibria? What is/are the Pareto efficient outcome(s) in this game? (Hint: Remember that Pareto efficiency occurs when no one person can be made better off without someone else being made worse off) The government offers a reward or subsidy for communities where farmers only allow 1 cow to graze on the common field, resulting in a new payoff matrix:…