f. Based on this, we should reject g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... X the null hypothesis. X O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 62% at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is different from 62% The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 62% at x = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is equal to 62%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 62% at a = 0.05, so there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is different from 62%. X h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O There is a 24.38% chance that the percent of all voters who prefer the Democratic candidate differs from 62%. O There is a 24.38% chance of a Type I error. If the sample proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is 53% and if another 50 voters are surveyed then there would be a 24.38% chance that we would conclude either fewer than 62% of all voters prefer the Democratic candidate or more than 62% of all voters prefer the Democratic candidate. O If the population proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is 62% and if another 50 voters are surveyed then there would be a 24.38% chance that either fewer than 53% of the 50 voters surveyed prefer the Democratic candidate or more than 71% of the 50 voters surveyed prefer the Democratic candidate.
f. Based on this, we should reject g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... X the null hypothesis. X O The data suggest the populaton proportion is significantly different from 62% at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is different from 62% The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 62% at x = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is equal to 62%. O The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 62% at a = 0.05, so there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is different from 62%. X h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O There is a 24.38% chance that the percent of all voters who prefer the Democratic candidate differs from 62%. O There is a 24.38% chance of a Type I error. If the sample proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is 53% and if another 50 voters are surveyed then there would be a 24.38% chance that we would conclude either fewer than 62% of all voters prefer the Democratic candidate or more than 62% of all voters prefer the Democratic candidate. O If the population proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is 62% and if another 50 voters are surveyed then there would be a 24.38% chance that either fewer than 53% of the 50 voters surveyed prefer the Democratic candidate or more than 71% of the 50 voters surveyed prefer the Democratic candidate.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:### Analysis of Voter Preferences
**f. Conclusion Based on the Hypothesis Test:**
- We should **reject** the null hypothesis.
**g. Final Conclusion:**
- The correct option highlighted is:
- "The data suggest the population proportion is not significantly different from 62% at α = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is equal to 62%."
**h. Interpretation of the p-value in Context:**
- The correct interpretation highlighted is:
- "If the sample proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is 53% and if another 50 voters are surveyed, then there would be a 24.38% chance that we would conclude either fewer than 62% of all voters prefer the Democratic candidate or more than 62% of all voters prefer the Democratic candidate."
**i. Interpretation of the Level of Significance:**
- The correct interpretation highlighted is:
- "If the population proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is 62% and if another 50 voters are surveyed, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concluding that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is different from 62%."
These selections provide insights into how statistical evidence from the data was analyzed. The p-value and level of significance (α = 0.05) are crucial in determining the strength and validity of the conclusions drawn from the voter survey data.

Transcribed Image Text:You are conducting a study to see if the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is significantly different from 62% at a level of significance of α = 0.05. According to your sample, 27 out of 50 potential voters prefer the Democratic candidate.
a. For this study, we should use a **z-test for a population proportion**.
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
- Null Hypothesis (H₀): p = 0.62
- Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): p ≠ 0.62
c. The test statistic \( z \) is -1.165 (please show your answer to 3 decimal places).
d. The p-value = 0.1248 (please show your answer to 4 decimal places).
e. The p-value is \( > \) α.
f. Based on this, we should **not reject** the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that:
- The data suggest the population proportion is **not significantly different** from 62% at α = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of voters who prefer the Democratic candidate is different from 62%.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 7 steps with 17 images

Recommended textbooks for you

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON

The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman