Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
Explain the theme of the changing role of women in the context of contemporary world history (NOT U.S.) from the time period between 1945-2000.   example of how this should look is attached.

Explain the theme of the changing role of women in the context of contemporary world history (NOT U.S.) from the time period between 1945-2000.   example of how this should look is attached.

icon
Related questions
Question

Explain the theme of the changing role of women in the context of contemporary world history (NOT U.S.) from the time period between 1945-2000.

 

example of how this should look is attached.

Answer: Conflict & compromise are central themes in interpreting historical events. In spite of the fact that some conflicts between ideologies, nations, and people can result in war, others can lead to better understanding. An analysis of history can be found in Conflict and Compromise. Compromise and conflict go hand in hand. Conflicts occur when there are disagreements on various issues and a compromise is needed to resolve them. Mahatma Gandhi, for instance, was a leader of the masses in India in the 1930s who believed in non-violence, civil disobedience, and satyagraha. Gandhi's Salt March was one of the consequences of the British's atrocities in India. It was therefore perceived as a violation of Indian rights when the British sought to tax salt, something that they freely used from their coasts. He refused to set up a committee to investigate the excesses of the police in India and rejected independence from India. A compromise was also reached by Gandhi, who suspended the Civil Disobedience Movement and said he would attend the next Round Table Conference to discuss India's future. Colonial India embodied conflict and compromise in this way during the 1930s. In spite of many calling this a retreat by Gandhi, historians also emphasize that this was the first time the government had offered a compromise and truce. This was to acknowledge the Indians' rights. Thus, conflict and compromise were seen as part of Modern World History extending beyond the United States.
Transcribed Image Text:Answer: Conflict & compromise are central themes in interpreting historical events. In spite of the fact that some conflicts between ideologies, nations, and people can result in war, others can lead to better understanding. An analysis of history can be found in Conflict and Compromise. Compromise and conflict go hand in hand. Conflicts occur when there are disagreements on various issues and a compromise is needed to resolve them. Mahatma Gandhi, for instance, was a leader of the masses in India in the 1930s who believed in non-violence, civil disobedience, and satyagraha. Gandhi's Salt March was one of the consequences of the British's atrocities in India. It was therefore perceived as a violation of Indian rights when the British sought to tax salt, something that they freely used from their coasts. He refused to set up a committee to investigate the excesses of the police in India and rejected independence from India. A compromise was also reached by Gandhi, who suspended the Civil Disobedience Movement and said he would attend the next Round Table Conference to discuss India's future. Colonial India embodied conflict and compromise in this way during the 1930s. In spite of many calling this a retreat by Gandhi, historians also emphasize that this was the first time the government had offered a compromise and truce. This was to acknowledge the Indians' rights. Thus, conflict and compromise were seen as part of Modern World History extending beyond the United States.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer