e cleaner. The floor cleaner has no market value until it is converted into a polish with the trade name FloorShine. The additional processing costs for this conversion amount to $257,400.
e cleaner. The floor cleaner has no market value until it is converted into a polish with the trade name FloorShine. The additional processing costs for this conversion amount to $257,400.
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
Related questions
Question
Carla Vista Industrial Products Inc. is a diversified industrial-cleaner processing company. The company’s Dargan plant produces two products: a table cleaner and a floor cleaner from a common set of chemical inputs (CDG). Each week, 931,500 ounces of chemical input are processed at a cost of $207,300 into 621,000 ounces of floor cleaner and 310,500 ounces of table cleaner. The floor cleaner has no market value until it is converted into a polish with the trade name FloorShine. The additional processing costs for this conversion amount to $257,400.
FloorShine sells at $20 per 30-ounce bottle. The table cleaner can be sold for $21 per 25-ounce bottle. However, the table cleaner can be converted into two other products by adding 310,500 ounces of another compound (TCP) to the 310,500 ounces of table cleaner. This joint process will yield 310,500 ounces each of table stain remover (TSR) and table polish (TP). The additional processing costs for this process amount to $106,000. Both table products can be sold for $15 per 25-ounce bottle.
The company decided not to process the table cleaner into TSR and TP based on the following analysis.
*If table cleaner is not processed further, it is allocated 1/3 of the $207,300 of CDG cost, which is equal to 1/3 of the total physical output.
**If table cleaner is processed further, total physical output is 1,242,000 ounces. TSR and TP combined account for 50% of the total physical output and are each allocated 25% of the CDG cost.
FloorShine sells at $20 per 30-ounce bottle. The table cleaner can be sold for $21 per 25-ounce bottle. However, the table cleaner can be converted into two other products by adding 310,500 ounces of another compound (TCP) to the 310,500 ounces of table cleaner. This joint process will yield 310,500 ounces each of table stain remover (TSR) and table polish (TP). The additional processing costs for this process amount to $106,000. Both table products can be sold for $15 per 25-ounce bottle.
The company decided not to process the table cleaner into TSR and TP based on the following analysis.
Process Further
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Table
Cleaner |
Table Stain
Remover (TSR) |
Table
Polish (TP) |
Total
|
|||||||||
Production in ounces
|
310,500 | 310,500 | 310,500 | |||||||||
Revenues
|
$260,820 | $186,300 | $186,300 | $372,600 | ||||||||
Costs:
|
||||||||||||
CDG costs
|
69,100 | * | 51,825 | 51,825 | 103,650 | ** | ||||||
TCP costs
|
0 | 53,000 | 53,000 | 106,000 | ||||||||
Total costs
|
69,100 | 104,825 | 104,825 | 209,650 | ||||||||
Weekly gross profit
|
$191,720 | $81,475 | $81,475 | $162,950 |
*If table cleaner is not processed further, it is allocated 1/3 of the $207,300 of CDG cost, which is equal to 1/3 of the total physical output.
**If table cleaner is processed further, total physical output is 1,242,000 ounces. TSR and TP combined account for 50% of the total physical output and are each allocated 25% of the CDG cost.
(a)
Determine if management made the correct decision to not process the table cleaner further by doing the following.
(1) Calculate the company’s total weekly gross profit assuming the table cleaner is not processed further.
(2) Calculate the company’s total weekly gross profit assuming the table cleaner is processed further.
(3) Compare the resulting net incomes and comment on management’s decision.
(1) Calculate the company’s total weekly gross profit assuming the table cleaner is not processed further.
Total weekly gross profit | $enter total weekly gross profit in dollars |
(2) Calculate the company’s total weekly gross profit assuming the table cleaner is processed further.
Total weekly gross profit | $enter total weekly gross profit in dollars |
(3) Compare the resulting net incomes and comment on management’s decision.
Management made the select a decision decision by choosing to not process table cleaner further. |
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 2 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education