During the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries, Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders were criticized for defining the American middle class as any household that makes $250,000 or less a year. At the time, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that the median income was $53,657 and the mean income was $75,738 for 2014.6 Would you agree or disagree with the Democratic candidates? How would you explain the median and mean income measures to the candidates?

During the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries, Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders were criticized for defining the American middle class as any household that makes $250,000 or less a year. At the time, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that the median income was $53,657 and the mean income was $75,738 for 2014.6 Would you agree or disagree with the Democratic candidates? How would you explain the median and mean income measures to the candidates?

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter28: The Distribution Of Income And Poverty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

how to find the 90/10 income ratio?
economic
1.What factors contribute to the differences in median income for various ethnic groups?
Question 14 The following income distribution data are for Lesotho: Quintile Percent Share Lowest 10% 2.2% Lowest 20% 3.0% Second quintile 7.2% Third quintile 12.5% Fourth quintile 21.0% Highest 20% 56.3% Lesotho's national income is about $1.69 billion. Lesotho's population is approximately 2 million. Suppose that each household (which consists of one person) makes the average income for its quintile. What is the poverty headcount if the poverty line is $20 per capita?
Actual Distribution of Wealth in the US Source: Adapted from the video "Wealth Inequality in America," 2012. Note: This document uses 2009 data. As of 2017, this inequality had only become greater. In this graph, the population of 300-plus million Americans is reduced to a representative group of 100 people. So, each person in this image represents 1% of the population. This group of 100 people has been lined up according to their wealth, poorest people on the left, wealthiest on the right. These 100 people have been shaded based on which 20% quintile they fall into. Then, the total wealth of the United States, which was roughly $54 trillion in 2009, was distributed among our 100 Americans. The poorest Americans don't even register, they are down to pocket change, and the middle class is barely distinguishable from the poor. 1% of America has 40% of all the nation's wealth, the bottom 80% only has 12% between them. The top 1% own half the country's, stocks, bonds and mutual funds. The…
The $1.4 billion trick to make us accept income inequality Lotteries take money from the poor and redistribute it unequally. The poor, the uneducated, and minorities play the lottery the most, and it takes a big chunk of their income Source: The Huffington Post, January 12, 2016 If the news clip is correct, how does a lottery change the distribution of income? Draw two Lorenz curves to ilustrate your answer. Lotteries result in the distribution of income Draw the Lorenz curve in a country that does not have lotteries. Label it Before Draw the Lorenz curve for the country after the introduction of lotteries. Label it After >> To reposition the label click on the cross by the label box and dragging it 100 80 60 40- 20 Cumulative percentage of income 100 20 40 60 00 Cumulative percentage of households >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question G
= The $1.4 billion trick to make us accept income inequality Lotteries take money from the poor and redistribute it unequally. The poor, the uneducated, and minorities play the lottery the most, and it takes a big chunk of their income. Source: The Huffington Post, January 12, 2016 If the news clip is correct, how does a lottery change the distribution of income? Draw two Lorenz curves to illustrate your answer. CID Lotteries result in the distribution of income OA. becoming more unequal OB. becoming more equal OC. remaining unchanged Draw the Lorenz curve in a country that does not have lotteries. Label it Before. Draw the Lorenz curve for the country after the introduction of lotteries. Label it After. >>> To reposition the label click on the cross by the label box and drag it. Cumulative percentage of income 100- 80- 60- 0 20 40 60 80 100 Cumulative percentage of households >>> Draw only the objects specified in the question. 40- 20-
Should the government be involved to create more equality in income disparities
The table shows the distribution of income in the Australia Complete the column of the table that records the cumulative percentages of income in Australia received by the cumulative percentages of households. Cumulative percentage of Income Households Lowest 20 percent (percentage) Households Income 8 Lowest 20 13 Lowest 40 Second 20 percent Third 20 percent 18 Fourth 20 percent 23 Highest 20 percent 38 Lowest 60 Lowest 80 100 100.0 The graph shows the Lorenz curve for the United States Draw the line of equality Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 40 percent of Australian households Label it 1, Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 80 percent of Australian households. Label it 2 Draw the Lorenz curve for Australia. Label it Based on the data provided, which country has the more unequal income distribution? OA Australa OB. Neither. They have the same degree of inequality. OC, The United States OD. It…
I need help soon as possible
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $24, 000, $18, 000, $50, 000, $100, 000, $12, 000, $36, 000, $80, 000, $10, 000, $24, 000, $16, 000. Calculate the share of total income that each quintile receives from this income distribution. What percent of the total income is represented by the highest quintile? Round your answer to the nearest tenth. Provide your answer below:
4. The Census Bureau recently created a new sup- plemental poverty measure, which defines the poverty threshold as the amount of money that the poorest third of Americans spend on food, clothing, shelter, and utilities. Journalist Robert Samuelson [2010] proposed the following thought experiment: Suppose that all Americans doubled their incomes tomorrow, and suppose that their spending on food, clothing, shelter, and utilities doubled as a result. What would happen to the number of people in poverty ac- cording to this new supplemental measure? Does this strike you as a desirable measure?