Do you agree or disagree with the discussion below? What is your reaction? Any additional thought? Goodward is correct because when cranberry growers pool their crops and determine the selling price, it can limit competition and restrict trade. This type of agreement can be seen as anti-competitive and violates antitrust laws that promote fair competition. When cranberry growers join together and set the price for their crops, it can limit fair competition and go against the laws that promote fair business practices. It goes against the law because such an agreement among cranberry growers can restrict competition and create a monopoly-like situation, which is considered unfair and anti-competitive. Antitrust laws promote fair competition and prevent practices that harm consumers or limit market competition.

Do you agree or disagree with the discussion below? What is your reaction? Any additional thought? Goodward is correct because when cranberry growers pool their crops and determine the selling price, it can limit competition and restrict trade. This type of agreement can be seen as anti-competitive and violates antitrust laws that promote fair competition. When cranberry growers join together and set the price for their crops, it can limit fair competition and go against the laws that promote fair business practices. It goes against the law because such an agreement among cranberry growers can restrict competition and create a monopoly-like situation, which is considered unfair and anti-competitive. Antitrust laws promote fair competition and prevent practices that harm consumers or limit market competition.

Similar questions

True/ False - Haley Edwards, in her TED talk about global trade deals, stresses the importance of free trade. True O False
One of the discussed intervention tools is called: "price ceiling". This is a maximum price that a producer can legally charge for the good. The state of Israel uses this tool to restrict the price of bread. What was the logic behind creating a price ceiling for bread? What could be the negative effects of using a price ceiling on bread?
Please answer the true or false
Do you agree or disagree with the discussion below? What is your reaction? Any additional thought? Goodward, a newly hired newspaper reporter for The Cape Cod News, learned that the local cranberry growers had made an agreement under which they pooled their cranberry crops each year and sold them at what they determined to be a fair price. Goodward believes that such an agreement is in restraint of trade and a violation of the antitrust laws. Is he correct? I would say yes, and this is because according to Twomey the antitrust law will step in when competitors create a barrier to market entry or collude on prices or production to control prices. Antitrust It is designed to prevent unfair practices that reduce competition, such as price fixing. These laws are crucial for maintaining a competitive marketplace and protecting consumers from unfair pricing. Since the local cranberry growers had made an agreement under which they pooled their cranberry crops each year and sold them at…
Why did the "fixed price" option work best in Latin America?
Suppose that Norway is a small country and currently produces 100,000 board feet of lumber at $600 per 1,000 board feet. Then it begins to trade at the world price of $500 per 1,000 board feet. As a result of trade, Norway's production falls to 50,000 board feet and its consumption increases to 200,000 board feet. What is Norway's total welfare gain once it begins to trade? $5,000 $7,500 $17,500 $15,000
Microsoft Acquires Skype In 2011. Microsoft purchased the online telecom company, Skype, to improve the video and voice communication capabilities of its Office products. In addition to gaining access to Skype's 107 million users, who were, on average, connected for over 100 minutes per month, the deal kept the platform away from rivals Google and Facebook. Microsoft knew that its business clients would benefit from Skype's friendly user-interface and sophisticated tools and features. However, the company currently had the homegrown Lync product in its portfolio, which was designed to integrate with Outlook and serve as clients' primary communications platform. Because of the redundancy of the two brands, Microsoft ultimately decided to eliminate the Lync brand and rebrand the tool's properties as Skype for Business. This allowed them to take advantage of the Skype brand's familiarity among consumers. Lync users could enjoy the same features they were used to but with the sleeker…
https://www.australiancompetitionlaw.info/cases/current
Limit global warming. Global warming above 2°C will cause dangerous and irreversible impacts that will harm our prosperity, security, health, and lives. Limiting warming to less than 2°C is not without challenges either (we are already seeing impacts today), however it is a benchmark by which scientists and world leaders believe we can lower the risks to a more manageable level. Preserve and create a healthy economy. Your policies should strive to lead a global energy transition that would preserve and create a healthy global economy. You must decide how to balance the short-term costs of climate actions with the long-term costs of damages from climate inaction. Note that financial costs are not explicitly predicted in the model as they are uncertain and controversial. You may offer your own hypotheses on the financial impacts of different decisions. While assessing the economics, also consider the potential to offset short-term costs with additional co-benefits e.g., benefits to the…
Which of the following statement is TRUE about the design of TRIPS agreement? S1: eliminate China from all intellectual property arrangement. S2: administer a much firmer execution of intellectual property regulations. S3: when a product causes harm, death, or damage, hold the company and its executives accountable. S4: traded software and documented property should be supported in developed market
Is the broad reach of U.S. antitrust law justified on the basis that foreign conduct harms U.S. consumers, or has the "domestic injury" exception to the FTAIA been pushed too far? Regardless of your view, what amendments would you suggest to the FTAIA to improve clarity and reduce the high cost of multinational litigation?