Do people cheat or lie when the cheating or lying is not easy to identify (such as filing of taxes)? College-aged subjects from various countries throughout the world were asked to roll a single six-sided die twice. The subjects were told that the first roll counted in determining a reward and the second roll was only to determine whether the die was working properly. Rewards were as follows: rolling a one meant earning 1 unit of the local currency (such as $1), rolling a two meant earning 2 units, and so on, except that rolling a six meant earning nothing. The rolling was done unsupervised (although results were secretly recorded) with the subjects free to report the outcomes of their respective rolls of the die (thereby creating an opportunity to cheat or lie about the outcome). Complete parts (a) through (e). Click the icon to view the results of the study *** (a) If individuals do not lie about the outcome of the first roll of the die, what would you expect the distribution of outcomes to be? P₁ P₂ P3 P4 P5 P6 (Type an integer or a fraction.) Data table The following distribution represents the outcomes based on the results reported in the study. The row "First Roll Frequency" represents the frequency each first roll resulted in the given outcome. The row "Reported Frequency" represents the outcome reported by the subjects. Outcome First Roll Frequency Reported Frequency 2 415 1 400 202 331 3 421 488 4 436 612 6 D -X 5 399 429 810 57
Do people cheat or lie when the cheating or lying is not easy to identify (such as filing of taxes)? College-aged subjects from various countries throughout the world were asked to roll a single six-sided die twice. The subjects were told that the first roll counted in determining a reward and the second roll was only to determine whether the die was working properly. Rewards were as follows: rolling a one meant earning 1 unit of the local currency (such as $1), rolling a two meant earning 2 units, and so on, except that rolling a six meant earning nothing. The rolling was done unsupervised (although results were secretly recorded) with the subjects free to report the outcomes of their respective rolls of the die (thereby creating an opportunity to cheat or lie about the outcome). Complete parts (a) through (e). Click the icon to view the results of the study *** (a) If individuals do not lie about the outcome of the first roll of the die, what would you expect the distribution of outcomes to be? P₁ P₂ P3 P4 P5 P6 (Type an integer or a fraction.) Data table The following distribution represents the outcomes based on the results reported in the study. The row "First Roll Frequency" represents the frequency each first roll resulted in the given outcome. The row "Reported Frequency" represents the outcome reported by the subjects. Outcome First Roll Frequency Reported Frequency 2 415 1 400 202 331 3 421 488 4 436 612 6 D -X 5 399 429 810 57
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337111348
Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
ChapterP: Prologue: Calculator Arithmetic
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2E: Pet Owners According to the Humane Society, in 2015, 65% of U.S. households owned at least one pet,...
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:Do
people cheat or lie when the cheating or lying is not easy to identify (such as filing of taxes)? College-aged subjects from various countries throughout the world were asked to roll
a single six-sided die twice. The subjects were told that the first roll counted in determining a reward and the second roll was only to determine whether the die was working properly.
Rewards were as follows: rolling a one meant earning 1 unit of the local currency (such as $1), rolling a two meant earning 2 units, and so on, except that rolling a six meant earning
nothing. The rolling was done unsupervised (although results were secretly recorded) with the subjects free to report the outcomes of their respective rolls of the die (thereby creating
an opportunity to cheat or lie about the outcome). Complete parts (a) through (e).
Click the icon to view the results of the study
CE
(a) If individuals do not lie about the outcome of the first roll of the die, what would you expect the distribution of outcomes to be?
P₁ P₂ P3 P4 P5 P6
(Type an integer or a fraction.)
Data table
The following distribution represents the outcomes based on the results reported in
the study. The row "First Roll Frequency" represents the frequency each first roll
resulted in the given outcome. The row "Reported Frequency" represents the
outcome reported by the subjects.
Outcome
First Roll Frequency
Reported Frequency
1
400
202
2
415
331
3
421
488
4
436
612
5
399 429
810
57
6 D
- X
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt