Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) differs from cost-benefit (B/C) analysis in that: Select one: a. CEA is more time-consuming and resource-intensive b. CEA cannot handle independent alternatives c. CEA expresses outcomes in natural units rather than in currency units d. CEA cannot handle multiple alternatives

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) differs from cost-benefit (B/C) analysis in that: Select one: a. CEA is more time-consuming and resource-intensive b. CEA cannot handle independent alternatives c. CEA expresses outcomes in natural units rather than in currency units d. CEA cannot handle multiple alternatives

EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY

7th Edition

ISBN:9781337668279

Author:Henderson

Publisher:Henderson

Chapter4: Economic Evaluation In Health Care

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5QAP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Question 9 9. A cost-benefit analysis is performed to assess: a. economic feasibility b. operational feasibility c. technical feasibility a. economic feasibility b. operational feasibility O c. technical feasibility
Please no written by hand and no emage
The climate policy toolkit has, to-date, mostly focused on demand side policies (i.e. policies that affect the pollution demand curve), some of which are ‘command-and control’ and others are market based (e.g. cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes). (a) Using a diagram or diagrams, explain how a cap-and-trade scheme could result in pollution reduction. (b) What is the Emissions Reduction Fund and what are its pros and cons? 1(c) Of the following four policy options, which one do you favour as a demandside policy and why? i. command-and-control in terms of a demand side climatechange ii. carbon tax iii. Emissions Reduction Fund iv. cap-and-trade scheme
All of these are correct regarding types of economic evaluation EXCEPT: a. In Cost Benefit Analysis, the cost of the intervention is compared with the benefit incurred from the intervention b. In Cost minimization analysis, the intervention can only be conducted when the outcomes of the comparing interventions are same c. The outcomes of Cost Effectiveness Analysis are measured in monetary terms d. Cost Utility Analysis is specially used when there are multiple objectives of the program and when both quality of life and quantity of life are important to know
Many people struggle with the idea that economics has any place in a discussion of relevant environmental issues. The unfortunate reality, however, is that policy making surrounding these issues is often influenced by budgetary factors. Environmental/ecological/sustainability economics can help in making sure our natural resources are appropriately valued in these budget analyses. For each of the following methods used to value natural resources, offer a brief explanation of how they work and in what context they might be used. • Cost of illness method • Replacement cost method • Defensive expenditures approach • Contingent valuation
What are the usual steps in Benefit – Cost Analysis? a) Try to figure out what result or conclusion you want, and then set the assumptions to make sure the analysis produces that result. b) Identify the potential benefits and figure out a way to valuate them. c) Identify the potential costs and valuate them. d) Dismiss those benefits and costs to which you cannot assign a numerical value e) Estimate the probability of each of the benefits and costs actually materializing or occurring. f) Mulltiply the value of costs and benefits by their respective probabilities to arrive at the "mathematical expectation" or "mathematically expected" value. g) For costs and benefits expected in the future, especially distant future, discount their value to the present time, using a "reasonable" discounting rate.
One of these is NOT TRUE about Cost-utility analysis: a. It measures outcomes in Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY), and Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) b. Cost is measured in monetary units c. The limitation of this analysis is that it is difficult to compare the interventions with differing natural effects d. It is used to make policy level decisions
Economists charged with the responsibility for performing a benefit–cost analysis encounter many decision points requiring judgment. Explain using suitable example how the decision point below is applied in benefit–cost analysis. Tangible versus Intangible Benefits
The benefits of a nonmonetary nature can be quantified and factored into the analysis. True or false? Explain how?
(a) Derive the first order condition showing how much labor and capital a producer should use to minimize the total costs of producing a given level of output. (b) What is the second order condition for the producer to achieve (a). (c) Draw a figure showing your answer to part (a) and another figure showing the opposite (i.e., a producer maximizing output with given total costs). How does either situation compare with a producer who has neither a total output constraint or a total cost constraint?
How does the incorporation of fiber- reinforced polymers (FRP) improve the performance of concrete structures? Don't use chatgpt.....
What is the main problem with using groundwater to increase water supplies? Group of answer choices A groundwater tends to be too expensive B groundwater aquifers are being rapidly depleted C the water is too salty D groundwater tends to be contaminated with pesticides