Consider the following three function definitions in Haskell: first x y = x ident x = x omega x = omega x We could also define these in ML, although with a slightly different syntax: fun Ident x = x; etc. How would the evaluations of the following expression in Haskell and ML compare= first (ident 3) (omega 1) (First (Ident 3) (Omega 1). in ML}
Consider the following three function definitions in Haskell: first x y = x ident x = x omega x = omega x We could also define these in ML, although with a slightly different syntax: fun Ident x = x; etc. How would the evaluations of the following expression in Haskell and ML compare= first (ident 3) (omega 1) (First (Ident 3) (Omega 1). in ML}
C++ for Engineers and Scientists
4th Edition
ISBN:9781133187844
Author:Bronson, Gary J.
Publisher:Bronson, Gary J.
Chapter6: Modularity Using Functions
Section6.1: Function And Parameter Declarations
Problem 11E
Related questions
Question
![### Function Definitions in Haskell and ML
**Consider the following three function definitions in Haskell:**
```haskell
first x y = x
ident x = x
omega x = omega x
```
- `first x y = x`: This function takes two arguments `x` and `y`, and returns `x`.
- `ident x = x`: This function takes a single argument `x` and returns `x`.
- `omega x = omega x`: This function is recursive and will cause an infinite loop when called, as it is defined in terms of itself with the same argument.
**The same functions can also be defined in ML, although with a slightly different syntax:**
```ml
fun Ident x = x;
```
- `fun Ident x = x;`: This is equivalent to `ident x = x` in Haskell, taking a single argument `x` and returning `x`.
**Comparison of Evaluations in Haskell and ML**
Consider the evaluation of the following expression in Haskell and ML:
```haskell
first (ident 3) (omega 1)
```
```ml
{First (Ident 3) (Omega 1). in ML}
```
- In Haskell:
- `ident 3` evaluates to `3` since `ident x = x`.
- `omega 1` does not terminate as it initiates an infinite loop (`omega 1 = omega 1`).
- `first` takes two arguments but will return the first one without evaluating the second, so `first (ident 3) (omega 1)` will effectively return `3` without getting stuck in the infinite loop caused by `omega 1`.
- In ML:
- `Ident 3` evaluates to `3`, analogous to Haskell's `ident 3`.
- However, `Omega` would initiate an infinite loop in ML just as in Haskell with the `omega` function.
- In ML, depending on the language's evaluation strategy, the overall result may differ from Haskell. In strict evaluation (which most ML variants follow), `Omega 1` would be evaluated before being passed into `First`, causing an infinite loop and preventing a result.
By comparing these evaluations, one can observe the differences in how Haskell and ML approach function evaluation, particularly in the handling of non-terminating functions and short-circuiting behavior.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F4a9bf715-7941-4859-ad33-64f7ce422f38%2F8077f046-8902-462f-b887-bdfa4fc46a26%2Fzp7fn4o_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:### Function Definitions in Haskell and ML
**Consider the following three function definitions in Haskell:**
```haskell
first x y = x
ident x = x
omega x = omega x
```
- `first x y = x`: This function takes two arguments `x` and `y`, and returns `x`.
- `ident x = x`: This function takes a single argument `x` and returns `x`.
- `omega x = omega x`: This function is recursive and will cause an infinite loop when called, as it is defined in terms of itself with the same argument.
**The same functions can also be defined in ML, although with a slightly different syntax:**
```ml
fun Ident x = x;
```
- `fun Ident x = x;`: This is equivalent to `ident x = x` in Haskell, taking a single argument `x` and returning `x`.
**Comparison of Evaluations in Haskell and ML**
Consider the evaluation of the following expression in Haskell and ML:
```haskell
first (ident 3) (omega 1)
```
```ml
{First (Ident 3) (Omega 1). in ML}
```
- In Haskell:
- `ident 3` evaluates to `3` since `ident x = x`.
- `omega 1` does not terminate as it initiates an infinite loop (`omega 1 = omega 1`).
- `first` takes two arguments but will return the first one without evaluating the second, so `first (ident 3) (omega 1)` will effectively return `3` without getting stuck in the infinite loop caused by `omega 1`.
- In ML:
- `Ident 3` evaluates to `3`, analogous to Haskell's `ident 3`.
- However, `Omega` would initiate an infinite loop in ML just as in Haskell with the `omega` function.
- In ML, depending on the language's evaluation strategy, the overall result may differ from Haskell. In strict evaluation (which most ML variants follow), `Omega 1` would be evaluated before being passed into `First`, causing an infinite loop and preventing a result.
By comparing these evaluations, one can observe the differences in how Haskell and ML approach function evaluation, particularly in the handling of non-terminating functions and short-circuiting behavior.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![C++ for Engineers and Scientists](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781133187844/9781133187844_smallCoverImage.gif)
C++ for Engineers and Scientists
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781133187844
Author:
Bronson, Gary J.
Publisher:
Course Technology Ptr
![C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337102087/9781337102087_smallCoverImage.gif)
C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program…
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781337102087
Author:
D. S. Malik
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCE
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780357392676
Author:
FREUND, Steven
Publisher:
CENGAGE L
![C++ for Engineers and Scientists](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781133187844/9781133187844_smallCoverImage.gif)
C++ for Engineers and Scientists
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781133187844
Author:
Bronson, Gary J.
Publisher:
Course Technology Ptr
![C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337102087/9781337102087_smallCoverImage.gif)
C++ Programming: From Problem Analysis to Program…
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781337102087
Author:
D. S. Malik
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCE
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780357392676
Author:
FREUND, Steven
Publisher:
CENGAGE L