Consider a Variant of the ultimatum game we studied in class in which players have Fairness considerations. The timing of the game is usual. First, Player 1 proposes the split (100-X², X) OF a hundred dollars to player 2, where XE [0,100]. Player 2 observes split & decides whether to accept (in which case they recieve money according to proposed Split) or reject (in which case they both get žero dollars). But now player i's utility equals to her monetary Utility minus the disutility From unFairness proportional to the differenc in Monetary outcomes. That is, given a Final Split (m., m₂) let u₁ (m₁, m₂) = m₁ -P. (m₁-m₂) ² U₁ (m₁, m₂) = m₁ - P₂ (m₁-m.)² where P₁, P₂ are parameters of the game indicating how strongly Players care about Fairness. Note that the case we considered corresponds to B₁ = P₂ = 0 (a) Let B₁ = T₁, P₂ = 0. Which offers will player 2 definitely accept? reject? Describe all sequentially rational strategies For player 2. (b) Let B₁ = 10₁ $₂=0. For each sequentially rational strategy OF player 2 you identified in part (a), either describe which proposal Maximizes player 1's continuation valve or explain why it does not exist (C) Let B₁ = 1 0 ₁ P₂=0. Describe all SPNE of the game.
Consider a Variant of the ultimatum game we studied in class in which players have Fairness considerations. The timing of the game is usual. First, Player 1 proposes the split (100-X², X) OF a hundred dollars to player 2, where XE [0,100]. Player 2 observes split & decides whether to accept (in which case they recieve money according to proposed Split) or reject (in which case they both get žero dollars). But now player i's utility equals to her monetary Utility minus the disutility From unFairness proportional to the differenc in Monetary outcomes. That is, given a Final Split (m., m₂) let u₁ (m₁, m₂) = m₁ -P. (m₁-m₂) ² U₁ (m₁, m₂) = m₁ - P₂ (m₁-m.)² where P₁, P₂ are parameters of the game indicating how strongly Players care about Fairness. Note that the case we considered corresponds to B₁ = P₂ = 0 (a) Let B₁ = T₁, P₂ = 0. Which offers will player 2 definitely accept? reject? Describe all sequentially rational strategies For player 2. (b) Let B₁ = 10₁ $₂=0. For each sequentially rational strategy OF player 2 you identified in part (a), either describe which proposal Maximizes player 1's continuation valve or explain why it does not exist (C) Let B₁ = 1 0 ₁ P₂=0. Describe all SPNE of the game.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
![Consider a Variant oF the ultimatum qame We Studicd inclass
in which players have Fairness considerations . The timing
OF the qame is vSual. First , Player 1 propasar the split
(100 -x", x) OF a hundred dellars to player 2,Where
XE [0,100]. Player 2 observes split & decides whether to accept
(in which case they recieve Money accor ding ti proposed Split)
or reject (in Which Case they both get žero dollars).But
now player i's Utility equals to her monetary Vtility minus
the disutility From unFairneas proportional tO the differene
in Monetary OutcCOMeS . That is, qiven a Final Split (m. ,m.) ket
u, (m. ,m.) = m, -P. (m, - m2)"
%3D
U. (m. ,m2)
= m,- P2 (m,-m.)
Where PP are parametens of the game indicating how strongly
Players care a bout Fairness. Note that the case we
considered corres pends to B, = B2 = 0
(a) Let B, = To ,P2 =
alcept ? revect ? Describe all seguentially rational Strategies
For player 2.
b) Let B, = 10 ,$=0. For each sequentially rational Strategy
of player 2 yoU identiFied in part (a) ;tither descripě
Whi ch propasa) Maxi mizes player 1s continuation.
valve or explaih Why it does not exist
©) Let B, - =0. Describe all SPNE OFthe game.
= 0. which oFfers will player 2 deFihitely](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fb4c0753e-a375-4dbe-a41d-9a101b34842c%2Ffff245d4-d972-429d-8e07-538f3bb64bd0%2F65q6x8vv_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Consider a Variant oF the ultimatum qame We Studicd inclass
in which players have Fairness considerations . The timing
OF the qame is vSual. First , Player 1 propasar the split
(100 -x", x) OF a hundred dellars to player 2,Where
XE [0,100]. Player 2 observes split & decides whether to accept
(in which case they recieve Money accor ding ti proposed Split)
or reject (in Which Case they both get žero dollars).But
now player i's Utility equals to her monetary Vtility minus
the disutility From unFairneas proportional tO the differene
in Monetary OutcCOMeS . That is, qiven a Final Split (m. ,m.) ket
u, (m. ,m.) = m, -P. (m, - m2)"
%3D
U. (m. ,m2)
= m,- P2 (m,-m.)
Where PP are parametens of the game indicating how strongly
Players care a bout Fairness. Note that the case we
considered corres pends to B, = B2 = 0
(a) Let B, = To ,P2 =
alcept ? revect ? Describe all seguentially rational Strategies
For player 2.
b) Let B, = 10 ,$=0. For each sequentially rational Strategy
of player 2 yoU identiFied in part (a) ;tither descripě
Whi ch propasa) Maxi mizes player 1s continuation.
valve or explaih Why it does not exist
©) Let B, - =0. Describe all SPNE OFthe game.
= 0. which oFfers will player 2 deFihitely
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 3 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305585126/9781305585126_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337106665/9781337106665_smallCoverImage.gif)
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259290619/9781259290619_smallCoverImage.gif)
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education