Consider a school that similar to Jacob university. Jacob university has 65% graduation rate and a student-faculty ration of 19:1, 37% of the classes have fewer than 20 students, 23% of the classes have more than 50 students, and have a freshman retention rate of 80%. Should Jacob university giving rate be greater or less than 8%? I need help sugesting giving rates and I am confused on what the corrent one is
Consider a school that similar to Jacob university. Jacob university has 65% graduation rate and a student-faculty ration of 19:1, 37% of the classes have fewer than 20 students, 23% of the classes have more than 50 students, and have a freshman retention rate of 80%. Should Jacob university giving rate be greater or less than 8%? I need help sugesting giving rates and I am confused on what the corrent one is
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
- Consider a school that similar to Jacob university. Jacob university has 65% graduation rate and a student-faculty ration of 19:1, 37% of the classes have fewer than 20 students, 23% of the classes have more than 50 students, and have a freshman retention rate of 80%. Should Jacob university giving rate be greater or less than 8%?
I need help sugesting giving rates and I am confused on what the corrent one is
School | SFR | LT20 | GT50 | GRAD | FRR | GIVE |
Arizona State | 24 | 42% | 16% | 59% | 81% | 8% |
Arkansas State —Jonesboro | 19 | 49% | 4% | 37% | 69% | 11% |
Auburn | 18 | 24% | 17% | 66% | 87% | 31% |
Air Force Academy | 8 | 74% | 0.10% | 81% | 88% | 11% |
Military Academy | 8 | 95% | 0% | 86% | 92% | 28% |
Akron | 20 | 39% | 6% | 35% | 69% | 15% |
Arizona | 20 | 35% | 17% | 60% | 79% | 5% |
Arkansas | 18 | 28% | 18% | 58% | 83% | 23% |
Ball State | 18 | 34% | 12% | 57% | 78% | 11% |
Baylor | 14 | 49% | 9% | 71% | 85% | 14% |
Boise State | 21 | 33% | 11% | 27% | 67% | 8% |
Boston College | 14 | 47% | 6% | 91% | 96% | 27% |
Bowling Green State | 19 | 33% | 7% | 61% | 75% | 8% |
Brigham Young —Provo | 21 | 46% | 12% | 78% | 84% | 17% |
at Buffalo—SUNY | 16 | 36% | 21% | 67% | 88% | 9% |
Alabama | 19 | 46% | 16% | 67% | 85% | 34% |
Central Michigan | 22 | 32% | 11% | 54% | 78% | 8% |
Clemson | 16 | 51% | 13% | 76% | 91% | 28% |
Colorado State | 18 | 34% | 19% | 64% | 83% | 7% |
California—Berkeley | 17 | 62% | 15% | 91% | 97% | 12% |
Cincinnati | 17 | 38% | 11% | 56% | 84% | 11% |
Colorado—Boulder | 18 | 38% | 16% | 68% | 84% | 8% |
California State —Fresno | 20 | 18% | 10% | 49% | 83% | 4% |
Duke | 8 | 71% | 6% | 94% | 97% | 36% |
East Carolina | 17 | 33% | 14% | 57% | 78% | 5% |
Eastern Michigan | 18 | 39% | 5% | 38% | 72% | 3% |
Florida Atlantic | 21 | 27% | 15% | 42% | 77% | 4% |
Florida International | 28 | 23% | 22% | 46% | 81% | 6% |
Florida State | 22 | 35% | 16% | 74% | 90% | 19% |
Connecticut | 18 | 44% | 17% | 81% | 93% | 17% |
Florida | 21 | 41% | 16% | 84% | 96% | 15% |
Georgia Institute Technology | 19 | 40% | 23% | 80% | 93% | 28% |
Georgia State | 20 | 14% | 16% | 48% | 83% | 6% |
Georgia | 19 | 35% | 12% | 82% | 94% | 14% |
Hawaii—Manoa | 14 | 45% | 10% | 50% | 78% | 8% |
Houston | 23 | 28% | 22% | 46% | 79% | 13% |
Indiana —Bloomington | 19 | 34% | 18% | 71% | 90% | 16% |
Iowa State | 17 | 30% | 20% | 70% | 85% | 15% |
Kansas State | 21 | 49% | 11% | 60% | 79% | 19% |
Kent State | 20 | 45% | 8% | 50% | 76% | 4% |
Idaho | 18 | 45% | 10% | 55% | 78% | 11% |
Illinois—Urbana-Champaign | 16 | 34% | 21% | 84% | 94% | 13% |
Iowa | 16 | 49% | 12% | 70% | 84% | 12% |
Kansas | 20 | 42% | 12% | 61% | 79% | 18% |
Kentucky | 18 | 30% | 16% | 58% | 80% | 12% |
Louisiana State —Baton Rouge | 22 | 34% | 19% | 61% | 85% | 14% |
Louisiana Tech | 22 | 48% | 9% | 49% | 73% | 13% |
Louisiana—Lafayette | 23 | 30% | 7% | 40% | 74% | 7% |
Louisiana—Monroe | 18 | 30% | 13% | 30% | 72% | 5% |
Louisville | 18 | 25% | 12% | 49% | 78% | 12% |
Marshall | 20 | 38% | 4% | 44% | 71% | 10% |
Miami —Oxford | 17 | 32% | 12% | 80% | 89% | 16% |
Michigan State | 16 | 23% | 21% | 77% | 91% | 14% |
Middle Tennessee State | 21 | 32% | 7% | 45% | 81% | 6% |
Mississippi State | 20 | 38% | 14% | 58% | 83% | 17% |
Maryland—College Park | 18 | 35% | 16% | 81% | 94% | 10% |
Massachusetts—Amherst | 19 | 45% | 17% | 69% | 87% | 11% |
Memphis | 15 | 36% | 11% | 40% | 76% | 6% |
Miami | 11 | 53% | 7% | 80% | 90% | 17% |
Michigan—Ann Arbor | 15 | 48% | 16% | 90% | 96% | 15% |
Minnesota—Twin Cities | 21 | 38% | 19% | 70% | 89% | 13% |
Missouri | 20 | 47% | 15% | 69% | 85% | 16% |
New Mexico State | 20 | 45% | 10% | 45% | 76% | 6% |
North Carolina State —Raleigh | 18 | 30% | 20% | 71% | 90% | 11% |
Northern Illinois | 17 | 44% | 12% | 56% | 75% | 6% |
Northwestern | 7 | 75% | 6% | 94% | 97% | 30% |
Naval Academy | 9 | 56% | 0.10% | 89% | 97% | 21% |
Nebraska—Lincoln | 20 | 38% | 14% | 64% | 84% | 22% |
Nevada—Reno | 27 | 33% | 16% | 50% | 78% | 9% |
New Mexico | 22 | 40% | 14% | 44% | 78% | 7% |
North Carolina—Chapel Hill | 14 | 37% | 13% | 90% | 97% | 22% |
North Texas | 23 | 29% | 20% | 48% | 76% | 5% |
Notre Dame | 12 | 55% | 10% | 96% | 98% | 41% |
Ohio State —Columbus | 19 | 32% | 20% | 78% | 93% | 15% |
Ohio | 19 | 42% | 11% | 65% | 80% | 8% |
Oklahoma State | 19 | 39% | 12% | 59% | 79% | 15% |
Oregon State | 25 | 36% | 20% | 60% | 82% | 12% |
Mississippi | 18 | 46% | 13% | 59% | 80% | 13% |
Oklahoma | 17 | 41% | 11% | 64% | 83% | 19% |
Oregon | 20 | 37% | 17% | 68% | 84% | 13% |
Pennsylvania State — Park | 17 | 39% | 15% | 85% | 93% | 21% |
Purdue —West Lafayette | 14 | 37% | 17% | 69% | 87% | 19% |
Rice | 6 | 69% | 8% | 92% | 97% | 32% |
Rutgers, the State New Jersey—New Brunswick | 15 | 41% | 20% | 77% | 91% | 10% |
San Diego State | 21 | 22% | 24% | 66% | 83% | 2% |
San Jose State | 25 | 25% | 9% | 44% | 82% | 2% |
Southern Methodist | 12 | 58% | 8% | 74% | 89% | 19% |
Stanford | 6 | 70% | 13% | 95% | 98% | 34% |
Pittsburgh | 14 | 42% | 18% | 78% | 92% | 13% |
South Alabama | 22 | 42% | 8% | 37% | 68% | 2% |
South Carolina | 19 | 38% | 11% | 68% | 87% | 17% |
South Florida | 28 | 23% | 16% | 51% | 86% | 15% |
Southern Mississippi | 18 | 43% | 11% | 47% | 74% | 13% |
Syracuse | 16 | 61% | 9% | 82% | 91% | 17% |
Temple | 19 | 33% | 8% | 65% | 87% | 8% |
Texas A&M —College Station | 19 | 21% | 23% | 79% | 92% | 21% |
Texas Christian | 13 | 40% | 8% | 74% | 86% | 18% |
Texas State —San Marcos | 19 | 19% | 19% | 55% | 78% | 5% |
Texas Tech | 23 | 22% | 24% | 63% | 82% | 15% |
Troy | 20 | 58% | 4% | 40% | 72% | 9% |
Tulane | 11 | 67% | 6% | 74% | 89% | 19% |
Tennessee | 15 | 31% | 8% | 60% | 85% | 11% |
Texas—Austin | 18 | 34% | 25% | 81% | 92% | 14% |
Toledo | 19 | 34% | 31% | 45% | 68% | 5% |
Alabama—Birmingham | 17 | 39% | 15% | 41% | 79% | 13% |
California—Los Angeles | 16 | 52% | 22% | 90% | 97% | 13% |
Central Florida | 31 | 28% | 23% | 63% | 86% | 16% |
Nevada—Las Vegas | 22 | 25% | 18% | 41% | 76% | 5% |
Southern California | 9 | 63% | 11% | 89% | 97% | 39% |
Texas—San Antonio | 23 | 24% | 23% | 26% | 58% | 5% |
Tulsa | 11 | 70% | 1% | 65% | 88% | 22% |
Utah | 15 | 42% | 17% | 57% | 83% | 11% |
Utah State | 19 | 32% | 18% | 56% | 74% | 8% |
Virginia | 16 | 52% | 16% | 93% | 97% | 22% |
Washington | 12 | 33% | 21% | 80% | 93% | 15% |
Wyoming | 14 | 42% | 10% | 53% | 73% | 10% |
Vanderbilt | 8 | 64% | 9% | 91% | 97% | 23% |
Virginia Tech | 17 | 25% | 21% | 80% | 92% | 15% |
Wake Forest | 11 | 54% | 3% | 89% | 94% | 29% |
Washington State | 15 | 37% | 22% | 69% | 83% | 13% |
West Virginia | 23 | 32% | 19% | 59% | 80% | 12% |
Western Kentucky | 19 | 43% | 6% | 49% | 73% | 13% |
Western Michigan | 19 | 36% | 11% | 52% | 74% | 10% |
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman