Consider a particle to be constrained to lie along a one-dimensional segment 0 to a. The probability that the particle is found to lie between x and x + dx is given by function p(x)dx where n=1,2,3... Show that p(x)dx is normailized and then calculate the average position of the particle along the line segment. SHOW FULL AND COMPLETE PROCEDURE. Integrals that you need are shown in the second image

Consider a particle to be constrained to lie along a one-dimensional segment 0 to a. The probability that the particle is found to lie between x and x + dx is given by function p(x)dx where n=1,2,3... Show that p(x)dx is normailized and then calculate the average position of the particle along the line segment. SHOW FULL AND COMPLETE PROCEDURE. Integrals that you need are shown in the second image

Similar questions

Problem Consider the ODE x = 2-3x with initial condition x(to) = 1 and to = 0. What is the value of the state x when t = 2? Estimate when the system will decay to a constant value using the time constant of the system (i.e., after 4 time constants)? 4
a particle is confined to move on a circle's circumference (particle on a ring) such that its position can be described by the angle ϕ in the range of 0 to 2π. This system has wavefunctions in the form Ψm(ϕ)= eimlϕ where ml is an integer. Show that the wavefunctions Ψm(ϕ) with ml= +1 and +2 are ORTHOGONAL Show full and complete procedure. Do not skip any step
Use your generic solution to the 2D box wavefunctions to demonstrate the following prop- erties of wavefunctions. 1. Show that if you independently normalize (x) and (y) that the product of (x) and (y) is also normalized. 2. Show that the wavefunctions for one dimension are orthogonal. Orthogonality means that f₁ Vndr = Smn, where the Kroenecker delta function means that the function is one for men and zero for m‡n. m 3. How many quantum numbers are needed to describe the energy of your system? 4. Show that the two dimensional wavefunctions are orthogonal by performing this test on the wavefunction for n = 1, ny = 2 and the wavefunction for nr = 2 and ny = 1. CLx Ly Mathematically the operations looks like f¹* f¹¹ V₁,2 (x, y) V2,1 (x, y) dxdy.
Problem #2 Calculate the Legendre transform (F1) of y = x². For your answer, give the new function F1 and its derivative dF1. (a(f(x)) Note that dy = C dx, C, = f(x), and dC, = (0) dx. dx
Part A Which particle can have its velocity known most precisely? Match the words in the left column to the appropriate blanks in the sentences on the right. Reset Help smallest position uncertainty The particle with the most precisely known velocity has the This can be observed for and the greatest wave function amplitude. smallest position uncertainty and wave function amplitude. greatest position uncertainty. The wave function amplitude does not play a role. greatest position uncertainty and the smallest wave function amplitude. Figure (x) (x) particle 1. AAAAA particle 2. particle 3. Particle 1 Particle 2 (x) particles 2 and 3. particles 1 and 2. Particle 3 Submit Previous Answers Request Answer
Part B: Error propagation Consider that you measured an angle 0 to be 40 degrees. The uncertainty of your measurement is + 1 degree. Using the rules for error propagations, determine the uncertainty of sin(0). Clearly show your work. Hint: The uncertainty of any function of a single variable, z = f(x), is the derivative of the function calculated at that point multiplied by the uncertainty of the variable. A(z) df Ax dx
Consider the following hypothetical results for an experiment similar to the one you designed and conducted this past week. Refer to Part 2 of the Student Lab Guide, (page 34 on propagation of uncertainty, and pages 53-56 on statistical significance of your results) for assistance. Ben and Jerry tested the dependence of the acceleration of a cart on the net force applied to that cart (a=F/m). The cart mass was known to be 0.600 kg with negligible uncertainty. They plotted acceleration versus force and found the slope of their graph to be 1.70 +/- 0.02. Answer the following questions: (a) What are the units of their slope? Why? (b) What is the expected value of their slope? Why? (c) Is their experimental result consistent with this expected value? Why or why not?
Consider a thin hoop of mass (1.420 ± 0.001) kg and radius (0.250 ± 0.002) m. The moment of inertia for a thin hoop rotating about an axis going through its center is MR2 . Calculate the moment of inertia of this hoop and its uncertainty using error propagation rules (see Appendix). Clearly show work. Please solve the uncertainty using the appendix I attached