Consider a market with two firms managed by Harry and Vera. Under a cartel (both firms pick the high price), each firm earns a profit of $85. Under a duopoly (both firms pick the low price), each firm earns a profit of $70. If the two firms pick different prices, the high-price firm earns a profit of $25 and the low-price firm earns a profit of $100. This is depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. The outcome of the pricing game is Vera High Price Low Price O A. Harry and Vera both pick the high price. O B. Harry picks the low price and Vera picks the high price. OC. Harry picks the high price and Vera picks the low price. Harry $85 $100 High Price $85 $25 O D. Harry and Vera both pick the low price. $25 $70 The outcome identified above is a Nash equilibrium because neither firm has an incentive to Low Price $100 $70 O A. pick the high price given that the other player is picking the low price. O B. pick the high price given that the other player is picking the high price. OC. pick the low price given that the other player is picking the high price. O D. pick the low price given that the other player is picking the low price.

Consider a market with two firms managed by Harry and Vera. Under a cartel (both firms pick the high price), each firm earns a profit of $85. Under a duopoly (both firms pick the low price), each firm earns a profit of $70. If the two firms pick different prices, the high-price firm earns a profit of $25 and the low-price firm earns a profit of $100. This is depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. The outcome of the pricing game is Vera High Price Low Price O A. Harry and Vera both pick the high price. O B. Harry picks the low price and Vera picks the high price. OC. Harry picks the high price and Vera picks the low price. Harry $85 $100 High Price $85 $25 O D. Harry and Vera both pick the low price. $25 $70 The outcome identified above is a Nash equilibrium because neither firm has an incentive to Low Price $100 $70 O A. pick the high price given that the other player is picking the low price. O B. pick the high price given that the other player is picking the high price. OC. pick the low price given that the other player is picking the high price. O D. pick the low price given that the other player is picking the low price.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The table below shows the payoffs for two firms competing on price (a Bertrand duopoly). Firm A and Firm B can each choose to raise their prices, or to keep their prices low. A's Strategy Raise Price Table 14.4 B's Strategy Raise Price A's profit $6,000 B's profit $6,000 C. Don't A's profit $30,000 Raise B's profit $20,000 a. Firm A: Don't Raise Price Firm B: Don't Raise Price Based on the pay-off table above, what is the Nash equilibrium outcome? b. Firm A: Raise Price Firm B: Don't Raise Price Firm A: Don't Raise Price Firm B: Raise Price d. More than one answer is correct Don't Raise Price A's profit $20,000 B's profit $30,000 A's profit $10,000 B's profit $10,000
If a market structure is an oligopoly, do Lexus, Cadillac, and Lincoln engage in sticky pricing? Who is the market leader?
Suppose that the central bank for this economy suddenly and unexpectedly decreases the money supply in an effort to reduce inflation. As a result of this unanticipated policy action, actual inflation falls to 3%. On the previous graph, use the black point (plus symbol labeled "B") to illustrate the short-run effects of this policy. Suppose that now, after a period of 3% inflation, households and firms begin to expect that the inflation rate will persist at the level of 3%. On the previous graph, use the purple line (diamond symbol) to draw SRPC₂, the short-run Phillips curve that is consistent with these expectations, assuming that it is parallel to SRPC₂- Finally, using the orange point (square symbol labeled "C"), indicate on the previous graph the new, long-run equilibrium for this economy. The inflation rate at point C is unemployment rate at point A. the inflation rate at point A, and the unemployment rate at point C is Was the central bank able to achieve its goal of lowering…
Airline Manufacturer A and Airline Manufacturer B are duopolists in their industry. Explain how the two firms could collectively benefit if they were to collude and form a cartel. Why might collusion be difficult?
Consider an industry that consists of 4 firms, all competing over the same market, given by the following demand equation: P=80-3Q All firms have the same Total Cost Function, given by: TC₁=10q,+2q Suppose the firms decide to collude and voluntarily restrict output and raise price, in order to increase profits. a) What price will be charged by the members of the cartel? Assume the head of the cartel is fair and distributes output q, equally among the 4 firms (since they have identical costs). b)What is the output of each individual firm? c) What is each individual firm's profit? We know that there is a built-in incentive for cartel members to cheat on the cartel. If, as a result, the cartel breaks down: d) What price will be charged in the market? e) Assuming each firm captures an equal share of the market, what now is each firm's output, q? f) What now is individual firm profit? g) Illustrate your answer
Russia, Iran and Qatar made the first serious moves in October 2008 toward forming an OPEC-style cartel for natural gas. Each of the countries can comply with the cartel agreement or to cheat on the cartel agreement. If all countries comply, the economic profit for each will be $140 million. If one country cheats, that country earns $200 million in economic profit and the other countries will have economic losses of $10 million. If all countries cheat, they break even. What are the strategies in this game? Earn between $140 and $200 million in profits. Cheat on the cartel agreement and earn -$10 million in profits. Comply with the agreement and earn $140 million in profit. Comply with the cartel agreement or to cheat on the cartel agreement.
If in theory collusion is good for the members of a cartel, give at least three reasons why in practice collusion is not widespread
Duopolists following the Bertrand pricing strategy face a market demand curve given by P = 90 - 2Q where Q is total market demand. Each firm can produce output at a constant marginal cost of 40 per unit. How much profit will each firm make? Duopolists following the Cournot strategy face a market demand curve given by P = 90 - 2Q where Q is total market demand. Each firm can produce output at a constant marginal cost of 40 per unit. If firm 1 moves first, how much profit will firm 1 make? Duopolists following the Cournot strategy face a market demand curve given by P = 90 - 2Q where Q is total market demand. Each firm can produce output at a constant marginal cost of 40 per unit. If firm 1 moves first, how much profit will firm 2 make? Round to the nearest whole number.
Suppose that two mining companies, Australian Minerals Company (AMC) and South African Mines, Inc. (SAMI), control the only sources of a rare mineral used in making certain electronic components. The companies have agreed to form a cartel to set the (profit-maximizing) price of the mineral. Each company must decide whether to abide by the agreement (i.e., not offer secret price cuts to customers) or not abide (i.e., offer secret price cuts to customers). If both companies abide by the agreement, AMC will earn an annual profit of $36 million and SAMI will earn an annual profit of $24 million from sales of the mineral. If AMC does not abide and SAMI abides by the agreement, then AMC earns $48 million and SAMI earns $6 million. If SAMI does not abide and AMC abides by the agreement, then AMC earns $12 million and SAMI earns $36 million. If both companies do not abide by the agreement, then AMC earns $18 million and SAMI earns $12 million. Complete the following payoff matrix using the…
Two duopolists are sharing a market in which they are contemplating whether to compete or to cooperate. If they cooperate and behave like a monopolist they will share the monopolist profit of $1800. If they compete each will get a profit of $800 but if one them cooperates while the other chooses to compete the one who cooperates gets $700 while the one who competes will end up with $1000. Set-up the game, explain the process and show the Nash-equilibrium reached when the game is played.
Seagate and Western Digital (WD) run a cartel producing identical 1 TB hard drives. The demand for hard drives is Q = 17 – P. They both have MC = 2 and no fixed cost so ATC = 2. This is a lot like the Coke-Pepsi game in the duopoly quantity_game video. You can verify that together the firms maximize their (combined) profit by each making 3.75 hard drives. What profit does Seagate make with this cartel agreement? $
Which of the following statements about tacit collusion is true? a) It may result in firms making less than maximum profit b) It can lead to price wars c) It involves allocating a production quota to each firm d) A cartel is an example