**Pollution Permit Allocation and Cost Analysis**### Table: Initial Pollution Permit Allocation and Action Plan**Instructions:**Complete the table based on the actions each firm will take at the given permit price. Determine the pollution each firm will eliminate and the related cost. Assume a firm buying two permits buys one from each of the other firms.**Hint:** Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.| Firm | Initial Pollution Permit Allocation (Units of pollution) | Action | Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated (Units of pollution) | Cost of Pollution Reduction (Dollars) ||--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|| Firm A | 2 | | | || Firm B | 2 | | | || Firm C | 2 | | | |### Section: Regulation Versus Tradable PermitsDetermine the total cost of eliminating six units of pollution using both regulation and tradable permits methods. Fill in the amounts.**Hint:** Use information from previous tasks.**Table: Total Cost of Eliminating Six Units of Pollution**| Proposed Method | Total Cost (Dollars) ||---------------------|----------------------|| Regulation | || Tradable Permits | |### Conclusion:In this scenario, conclude whether eliminating pollution is **[more/less]** costly to society when the government regulates each firm to eliminate a specific amount versus when it allocates tradable pollution permits. **5. Correcting for Negative Externalities - Regulation versus Tradable Permits**Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods:### Methods to Reduce Pollution1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation.2. The government issues tradable pollution permits.The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms.| Firm | Cost of Eliminating the... | First Unit of Pollution (Dollars) | Second Unit of Pollution (Dollars) | Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) ||--------|----------------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|| Firm A | | 95 | 120 | 200 || Firm B | | 450 | 800 | 1,050 || Firm C | | 80 | 100 | 150 |Next, suppose that two government officials proposed alternative plans that would reduce pollution by 6 units.

In economics, we make the assumption that any transaction involving two people must be true or it…

Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount it costs each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of the other firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.) Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C Initial Pollution Permit Allocation (Units of pollution) Regulation Versus Tradable Permits 2 Proposed Method Regulation Tradable Permits Action Determine the total cost of eliminating six units of pollution using both methods, and enter the amounts in the following table. (Hint: You might need to get information from previous tasks to complete this table.) Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated (Units of pollution) Total Cost of Eliminating Six Units of Pollution (Dollars) Cost of Pollution Reduction (Dollars) In this case, you can conclude that eliminating pollution is costly to society when the government regulates each firm to eliminate a certain amount of pollution than when it allocates pollution permits that can be bought and sold.

Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount it costs each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of the other firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.) Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C Initial Pollution Permit Allocation (Units of pollution) Regulation Versus Tradable Permits 2 Proposed Method Regulation Tradable Permits Action Determine the total cost of eliminating six units of pollution using both methods, and enter the amounts in the following table. (Hint: You might need to get information from previous tasks to complete this table.) Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated (Units of pollution) Total Cost of Eliminating Six Units of Pollution (Dollars) Cost of Pollution Reduction (Dollars) In this case, you can conclude that eliminating pollution is costly to society when the government regulates each firm to eliminate a certain amount of pollution than when it allocates pollution permits that can be bought and sold.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

THE answer is 1a $130, 1b Firm 1 buys 3 Firm 2 buys 7, 1c $120 I need to know why and show the process.
Suppose the the government has set the trading price of a permit at $126 per permit. Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount it costs each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of the other firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.) Firm Firm A Firm B Firm C Initial Pollution Permit Allocation (Units of pollution) 2 2 2 Regulation Versus Tradable Permits Action Proposed Method Regulation Tradable Permits Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated (Units of pollution) Cost of Pollution Reduction (Dollars) Determine the total cost of eliminating six units of pollution using both methods, and enter the amounts in the following table. (Hint: You might need to get information from previous tasks to complete this table.) Total Cost of Eliminating…
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 100 – 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 50 – E. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $4 to $12, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $____
Explain: “Without a market for pollution rights, dumping pollutants into the air or water is costless; in the presence of the right to buy and sell pollution rights, dumping pollutants creates an opportunity cost for the polluter.” What is the significance of this opportunity cost to the search for better technology to reduce pollution?
There is another entire part of this lesson. Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount it costs each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of the other firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.) Firm Initial Pollution Permit Allocation Action Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated Cost of Pollution Reduction (Units of pollution) (Units of pollution) (Dollars) Firm A 2 Firm B 2 Firm C 2
According to the graph below, which amount represents the most efficient level of pollution that needs to be controlled? Marginal Cost (dollars per unit) SO A-O B-O B-A Marginal Control Cost None of the above Total Total Damage Control Cost Cost Marginal Damage Cost B Quantity of Pollution Emitted (units)
Lecture: Externality - Pigou8. All-Leather is a tanning company located on Lake Michigan in Chicago. Its total cost functionis C(QA) = 125 + 8QA + 5QA2, where QA is leather production per week in thousands of pounds.a) If leather sells for $408 per thousand pounds, how much leather will All-Leather produce?How much profit does All-leather earn?Enjoy is a beverage company located on Lake Michigan near All-Leather in Chicago. Enjoy’sproduction of beverages is negatively affected by water pollution from All-Leather’s productionof leather. Enjoy’s total cost function to produce beverages isC(QE) = 10QE +3QE2 + 3QA2where QE is Enjoy’s weekly production of beverages, in thousandsof gallons and, as above, QA is All-Leather’s weekly production of leather.b) Is this an example of a pecuniary externality or a real externality? Explain.c) What is the extra cost to Enjoy from an additional thousand tons of leather production by AllLeather (i.e., the external marginal cost of an extra unit of QA…
1. A firm's marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200-5E. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160-4E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of pollution will the firm emit? b)What will be the firms total abatement cost? Will it buy or sell permits and how many? c) What will be the net cost to the firm after trading? What will be the net gain to the firm from adopting the new abatement technology
Chapter 10 The first government employee suggests reducing pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm reduce its pollution by 2 units. Complete the following table with the total cost to each firm of reducing its pollution by 2 units. Firm Total Cost of Eliminating Two Units of Pollution (Dollars) Firm A Firm B Firm C ☐☐ Method 2: Tradable Permits Meanwhile, the other employee proposes using a different strategy to achieve the government's goal of reducing pollution in the area from 1 6 units. This employee suggests that the government issue two pollution permits to each firm. For each permit a firm has in its possession, i 1 unit of pollution. Firms are free to trade pollution permits with one another (that is, buy and sell them) as long as both firms can agree on For example, if firm A agrees to sell a permit to firm B at an agreed-upon price, then firm B would end up with three permits and would nee reduce its pollution by only 1 unit…
Two firms each currently dump 20 tons of pollution a piece into a local river. The government wants to reduce the amount of pollution in the river so they issue 5 permits to each firm. The cost for firm A to reduce their pollution by 1 ton is $1000 and the cost for firm B to reduce their pollution by 1 ton is $800. When answering the questions below simply enter the number for your answer do not write a full sentence. Question 1 If trade is NOT allowed what will be the cost of reducing pollution will be for firm A. total. for firm B, and in
੩ Macmillan Learning In accordance with the 1990. Clean Air Act, the state imposes a pollution limit on the market for steel manufacturing shown on the graph below. Place the line segment labeled "Pollution limit" at the optimal pollution limit. Price and cost ($ per ton) 3 2 1 10 9 Marginal social cost B 8 7 6 5 4 Pollution limit Marginal cost Demand = marginal benefit A 0 0 2 6 8 10 12 14 Quantity in thousands of tons 16 18 20 The socially optimal price is $ TOOLS хтоу
I Price and cost (thousands of dollars per student) 20 16 12 8 0 200 A) 0 students; 400 students B) 600 students; 600 students C) 400 students; 600 students D) 600 students; 400 students E) 400 students; 400 students S = MC MSB MB 400 600 800 1,000 Quantity (students per year) 35) 35) The figure above shows the market for private elementary school education in Chicago. There is no external cost of private elementary education. If the government does not intervene in this market, the equilibrium number of students being privately educated is and the efficient quantity is