Draw a graph with pollution abatement on the horizontal axis (assume a firm can remove up to 100 tons of pollution) and dollars ($) on the vertical axis. Draw one firm's marginal abatement cost curve (MC). Say a pollution tax is imposed on the firm. a. What are the costs the firm would incur if they chose to not reduce pollution at all? b. Is there a different level of pollution abatement the firm could choose that would result in lower costs? c. Label that level of abatement A* on your graph and shade in the area that represents the cost-savings as compared to when they polluted 100 tons (did no abatement)

Draw a graph with pollution abatement on the horizontal axis (assume a firm can remove up to 100 tons of pollution) and dollars ($) on the vertical axis. Draw one firm's marginal abatement cost curve (MC). Say a pollution tax is imposed on the firm. a. What are the costs the firm would incur if they chose to not reduce pollution at all? b. Is there a different level of pollution abatement the firm could choose that would result in lower costs? c. Label that level of abatement A* on your graph and shade in the area that represents the cost-savings as compared to when they polluted 100 tons (did no abatement)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Exercise 2.23-✰✰✰ Challenging Question ★★★. The Mondevil Corporation operates a chemical plant, which is located on the banks of the Sacramento river. Downstream from the chemical plant is a group of fisheries. The Mondevil plant emits by-products that pollute the river, causing harm to the fisheries. The profit Mondevil obtains from operating the chemical plant is $II > 0. The harm inflicted on the fisheries due to water pollution is equal to $L> 0 of lost profit [without pollution the fisheries' profit is $A, while with pollution it is $(A - L)]. Suppose that the fisheries collectively sue the Mondevil Corporation. It is easily verified in court that Mondevil's plant pollutes the river. However, the values of II and L cannot be verified by the court, although they are commonly known to the litigants. Suppose that the court requires the Mondevil attorney (Player 1) and the fisheries' attorney (Player 2) to play the following litigation game. Player 1 is asked to announce a number x >…
See attached for environmental economics question part two
A city currently emits 16 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. The table below shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits. Emissions Total Cost Marginal Cost Total Benefit Marginal Benefit 16 MG Current N/A Current N/A 12 MG 50 800 8 MG 150 1300 4 MG 500 1650 0 MG 1200 1950 Complete the table. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?
\table[[],,,, Pollute, Use FiThere are two firms whose factories sit alongside a lake. It costs each firm $2,100.00 to install filters to avoid polluting the lake. Because both firms utilize the lake's water to produce goods, a polluted lake hurts their production process and increases their costs. Assume that the cost to each firm of a polluted lake is $1400.00 times the number of polluting firms. Fill in the cost matrix based on the above information. Note: Include negative signs because this problem refers to costs.Which of the following are true about the equilibrium in a one-shot game? Choose one or more: A. Both firms pollute. B. Only firm 2 pollutes. C. The equilibrium is not Pareto optimal. D. Neither firm pollutes. E. Only firm 1 pollutes. Pollute Firm 1 Use Filter Firm 2 Pollute Use Filter
The graph shows the marginal cost of abatement curve, which shows the extra cost to the firm of cleaning up an additional unit of pollution. When a pollution charge of $5 per unit emitted is imposed, how many units of pollution will the firm choose to clean up? units of pollution cleaned up: When a pollution tax of $20 per unit emitted is imposed, how many units of pollution will the firm choose to clean up? units of pollution cleaned up:
True/False: Suppose there are two polluting firms that have different marginal abatement cost curves, MCA1 and MCA2. Any combination of pollution abatement levels, A1 for firm 1 and A2 for firm 2, that minimizes the total cost of abatement will also produce the allocatively efficient level of total abatement AE. Explain. Credit is given for the thoroughness of the explanation. Include a graph in your answer.
yn iru Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of Pollution First Unit of Pollution Firm (Dollars) (Dollars) Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 150 1,050 Firm X 80 100 800 450 Firm Y 200 Firm Z 120 95…
Please drag and drop the markers 1 through 5 below to denote the appropriate position on the diagram that answers the question. a) Show with marker 1 the efficient level of marginal abatement costs. b) Show with marker 2 the marginal abatement costs if each produce must reduce pollution to 7.5 units. c) Denote with marker 3 the area that measures total abatement costs for each polluter. d) Show with marker 4 the marginal abatement costs if sources 1 and 2 merged and were constrained to a maximum total emissions of 15 units. e) Show with marker 5 the total abatement costs if both sources merged and were constrained to a maximum total emissions of 15 units. Marginal Cost (in dollars) MC MC, Quantity of Emissions Reduced A Source 1 10 5 4 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 O Source 2 5
Help
(A) Suppose that the two firms merge. Write down the profit function of the merged firm. Calculate the profit maximizing level of output, the amount of pollution for the merged firm, and its profit. Is the merger Pareto improvement? Why or why not? (B) Suppose that the merger is forbidden by the government. Instead, now the fishery has the property right to water. In other words, anybody who wants to pollute the water needs to buy a pollution right from the fishery. Let the price of the pollution right be Px. Write down the steel mill’s new profit function and the fishery’s new profit function. (C) Calculate the profit maximizing level of output for each firm, the amount of pollution, and the price of pollution right. please, please answer the three questions together..
Consider a lake found in the village of Sturbridge, and then answer the questions that follow. The village has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The village also has a chemical plant that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the chemical plant's waste decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit. Suppose that the chemical plant could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the chemical plant uses the recycling method, then the chemical plant economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the chemical plant does not use the recycling method, then the chemical plant's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are…
A village has 4 farmers. Each summer, all the farmers graze their sheep on the village green. The cost of buying and caring for sheep is very small and can be regarded as 0. The value to a farmer of grazing a sheep on the green when a total of F sheep are grazing is v(F) per sheep: v(F) (price of a sheep) 1 $13 $12 3 $9 4 $7 $4 6+ $0 Suppose you are one of the 4 farmers in the game. Your optimal choice is to own (choose on) farmers chooses to own one (1) sheep. sheep if each of the other three Your optimal choice is to own (choose on). farmers chooses to own one (1) sheep. sheep if each of the other three 1 4.