complete five oscillations. Which of the following is a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy between the calculated and experimental periods?
complete five oscillations. Which of the following is a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy between the calculated and experimental periods?
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:B
mmmmm
(D)
2.50
k = 100.0
N
m
Students build an oscillator by hanging an object from an ideal vertical spring. The object has a label that
indicates its mass is 2.50 kg. The spring is to have a spring constant of 100.0 . The students use
these values to calculate the period of oscillation to be 0.993. The students set the oscillator into motion
and use a motion sensor to determine experimentally that it takes 4.62 seconds for the object to
complete five oscillations. Which of the following is a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy between
the calculated and experimental periods?
The calculated value of the period is incorrect.
The mass of the object is actually larger than its labeled value.
There is an error in the use of the motion sensor.
There is friction related to the motion of the spring.
ZE
E The spring constant is actually larger than its design value.
m
t
C
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
