Charles went to Eaton’s in Heritage Mall seeking a refund. However, an argument ensued which caught the attention of the security guard, Fran. Fran took Charles elbow and started to escort him out of the store. Charles protested but did not create a disturbance. Near the door, Charles pushed Fran away, presumably wishing to go through the doors unassisted. Fran reacted quicky and violently putting Charles into a headlock. Charles glasses were knock off and his lip got cut. He was handcuffed and detained in the security office for four hours. Fran took Charles wallet and removed his driver’s license and photograph him without consent. Charles asked Fran that he would leave and asked if he can call his wife. He further asked to call the police. All requests were refused. Please state your reasons on Excessive use of force constituted battery, tort, and vicarious liability; False and unlawful imprisonment; and Trespass

Charles went to Eaton’s in Heritage Mall seeking a refund. However, an argument ensued which caught the attention of the security guard, Fran. Fran took Charles elbow and started to escort him out of the store. Charles protested but did not create a disturbance. Near the door, Charles pushed Fran away, presumably wishing to go through the doors unassisted. Fran reacted quicky and violently putting Charles into a headlock. Charles glasses were knock off and his lip got cut. He was handcuffed and detained in the security office for four hours. Fran took Charles wallet and removed his driver’s license and photograph him without consent. Charles asked Fran that he would leave and asked if he can call his wife. He further asked to call the police. All requests were refused. Please state your reasons on Excessive use of force constituted battery, tort, and vicarious liability; False and unlawful imprisonment; and Trespass

Similar questions

Leon A. Tashof operated a store known as the New York Jewelry Company. The store was located in an area that served low-income consumers, many of whom had low-paying jobs and had no bank or charge accounts. About 85 percent of the store’s sales were made on credit. The store advertised eyeglasses “from $7.50 complete,” including “lenses, frames and case.” Tashof advertised this sale extensively on radio and in newspapers. Evidence showed that of the 1,400 pairs of eyeglasses sold by the store, fewer than 10 were sold for $7.50; the rest were more expensive glasses. The Federal Trade Commission sued Tashof for engaging in bait-and-switch marketing, in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. a) Explain what a bait and switch is. b) Was Tashof’s conduct in this case ethical? c) Who wins, and why?
Under what circumstances should a principal (employer) be responsible for the torts committed by an agent (employee)? If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what circumstances should the agent be held personally liable? Provide an example to illustrate your opinion. What ethical considerations underlie the doctrine of respondeat superior?
Joseph Eugene Dodson, age sixteen, purchased a used pickup truck from Burns and Mary Shrader. The Shraders owned and operated Shrader’s Auto Sales. Dodson paid $14,900 in cash for the truck. At the time of sale, the Shraders did not question Dodson’s age, but thought he was eighteen or nineteen. Dodson made no misrepresentation concerning his age. Nine months after the date of purchase, the truck began to develop mechanical problems. A mechanic diagnosed the problem as a burnt valve but could not be certain. Dodson, who could not afford the repairs, continued to drive the truck until one month later, when the engine “blew up.” Dodson parked the vehicle in the front yard of his parents’ home and contacted the Shraders to rescind the purchase of the truck and to request a full refund. a. What arguments would support Dodson’s termination of the contract? b. What arguments would support Shrader’s position that the contract is not voidable? c. Which side should prevail? Explain.
Lucy cannot stand the fact that her ex-husband, Ethan, is about to get remarried. After all, it was a horrible breakup, and Ethan was really mean to her. Lucy decides to get her revenge by telling Ethan’s employer that Ethan stole large amounts of money from his previous employer, even though Lucy knows it is not true. If Lucy follows through on her plan, she will have: a) not committed the tort of defamation because the statement would not harm Ethan’s reputation. b) committed the tort of defamation because it is an untrue statement intended to harm Ethan’s reputation, and she stated it to another person. c) not committed the tort of defamation, because she only made the statement to one person.
Business Tort of Negligence Dewayne, a driver for Speedy Delivery Company, leaves the truck's motor running in neutral and carelessly forgets to set the parking brake while making a delivery. The truck rolls and crashes into a nearby gas station pump, igniting a fire that spreads quickly to a construction site a block away. A burned wall collapses onto a crane, which falls on Fazio, a bystander, and injures him. What must Fazio show to recover damages from Speedy Delivery? If you are the attorney for Speedy Delivery what would be your best defense argument? Your paper should be between 500-750 words, with at least two cited external resources. View your assignment rubric. ROLK LOVE
Describe what is intoxication in law and explain how a person can avoid a contract entered into under intoxication using the case law: gore v gibson
Erin is a lawyer with twin sons that are 12 years old. Erin is resting in her bedroom when she hears loud noises in the family room. She springs up, runs to the family room, and sees one son, Phil, punch the other son, Kip. Erin immediately orders Phil to stay in his room for the rest of the day and to not use the internet for 48 hours. As Phil mopes along the hallway to his room, Phil shouts. "Kip punched me first!" What legal principle would Erin recognize Phil's remark as being? O ad hoc because Phil is adding an accusation against his opponent Kip. O in pari materia because Kip attacked in the same manner as did Phil O caveat emptor because Phil thinks he is right. O jus ad bellum because Kip's action is what actually started the fight (the "war") O in pari delicto because they (Phil and Kip) are at equal fault.
Nick had just finished his shift at work and was just about to drive home when he received a telephone call from his girlfriend. She sounded worried because she thought that someone was trying to break into their flat. Nick rushed home, driving at 45mph in a 30mph zone. When he pulled into the parking lot, Nick saw Bill running away from the building carrying what looked like a laptop. Nick chased after Bill and when he caught up with him, he punched him very hard, leaving him unconscious. Bill later recovered but spent some time in hospital receiving treatment for his injuries. Advise Nick of any criminal offences that he may have committed and any defences that he may have? Please consider the elements of the crimes committed. Nick is tried for his crime(s) in the Crown Court. Explain the role of the Crown Court in criminal proceedings including considering the role of the jury, any rights of appeal and the sentences that may be applied.
Henry is towing two water skiers on the Bandock River with the two experienced water skiers conducting “crossovers” where the skiers pass from side to side across the wake of the towing boat and across each other’s paths. Henry is distracted momentarily and drives too close to a boat moored near the shoreline and to avoid a collision he manoeuvres quickly. In doing so, Megan, one of the water skiers that Henry is towing, is propelled into a pontoon and severely injured. Megan now wants recourse for her physical injuries through the law of negligence.Required:a) Identify the legal issues arising in negligence and advise Megan as to the likelihood of success
Thomas, a salesman, enters Jimmy’s yard even though there is a sign outside that says “No salespeople allowed’. Jimmy, who is much smaller than Thomas, threatens him with a broom handle. Thomas wrestles with Jimmy and in the process damages a valuable antique chair on the front porch. Advise each party of their legal rights. (Explain the operation of the Australian legal systems and processes relevant to contract and consumer law, including basic principles of the law of torts).
William Brill a truck driver, had just delivered lumber to Queens lumber. As he was returning to his truck he was hit by a forklift driven bv an employee eric vigil. After sustaining serious injuries, Brill sued both Queens Lumber and Vigil for negligence. What elements does brill have to prove to establish negligence? In general, what duty does a driver of a motor vehicle have to pedestrians? On what theory of liability could Queens Lumber be found negligent? Would the result be the same if Brill had failed to look both ways before walking back to his truck? Brill v Queens lumber Co.
Alan rents a flat in a block of units in the eastern suburbs of Sydney. One summer evening, during a balcony BBQ, Alan tosses several empty beer cans onto the adjoining balcony of the flat rented by Jimmy. What redress in law, if any, does Jimmy have?