C. To test the null hypothesis that computer programmers' college major is not related to their programming capabilities, the work of 100 randomly chosen programmers was rated as either weak or strong. The following crosstabulation was obtained: Programming Capability Major WeakStrong Humanities:1212 Science:1224 Business:2416 1.If the null hypothesis is correct, how many Business majors with weak programming capability would we expect to find in our sample? (That is, what is the expected frequency for that cell?) 2.The computed value of χ2 (chi-square) for this table is 5.45. Should the null hypothesis be rejected at the .05 level of significance? (Be sure to show the statistics that lead to your decision.) 3.Treating college major as the independent variable, calculate and interpret an appropriate measure of association. 4.Using and reporting the appropriate percentages, show which major has the strongest programming capability. D. Suppose you are interested in the relationship between educational attainment (measured by years of completed schooling) and the how long people live (measured by age at death in years). For a sample of 100 recently-deceased people, you collect information on their educational attainment and their age at death. Treating educational attainment as the independent variable (X) and age at death as the dependent variable (Y), you compute the following regression equation. Y = 55 + 2.0X + e 1.Interpret in words this equation. That is, what do each of the numerical values in the equation tell us? Be specific. 2.How long would you predict that someone with a college education (that is, someone with 16 years of schooling) will live? E. A researcher wants to know if there is a relationship between year in college (X) (1=freshman, 2=sophomore, 3=junior, 4=senior) and percent of class lectures attended (Y). For a sample of 10 students, the following results are obtained: ΣX = 23 ΣY = 730 ΣXY = 1630 ΣX2 = 65 ΣY2 = 54100 X̅ = 2.3 Y̅ = 73 Σ(Y-Y̅)2 = 810 Σ(Ŷ-Y̅)2 = 198.3 Σ(Y-Ŷ)2 = 611.7 1.Compute the correlation coefficient between year in college and percent of class lectures attended. What does this value tell us? 2.Using a significance level of .05, test the null hypothesis that, in the population, the correlation between year in college and percent of class lectures attended is zero. E. (continued) 3.Compute and interpret the coefficient of determination (R2). F. Whenever we look at the relationship between two variables (regardless of the level of measurement of those variables), we are interested in two aspects of that relationship. What are those two "aspects" and why is each important? (You can discuss more than two if you feel it necessary).
C. To test the null hypothesis that computer programmers' college major is not related to their programming capabilities, the work of 100 randomly chosen programmers was rated as either weak or strong. The following crosstabulation was obtained: Programming Capability Major WeakStrong Humanities:1212 Science:1224 Business:2416 1.If the null hypothesis is correct, how many Business majors with weak programming capability would we expect to find in our sample? (That is, what is the expected frequency for that cell?) 2.The computed value of χ2 (chi-square) for this table is 5.45. Should the null hypothesis be rejected at the .05 level of significance? (Be sure to show the statistics that lead to your decision.) 3.Treating college major as the independent variable, calculate and interpret an appropriate measure of association. 4.Using and reporting the appropriate percentages, show which major has the strongest programming capability. D. Suppose you are interested in the relationship between educational attainment (measured by years of completed schooling) and the how long people live (measured by age at death in years). For a sample of 100 recently-deceased people, you collect information on their educational attainment and their age at death. Treating educational attainment as the independent variable (X) and age at death as the dependent variable (Y), you compute the following regression equation. Y = 55 + 2.0X + e 1.Interpret in words this equation. That is, what do each of the numerical values in the equation tell us? Be specific. 2.How long would you predict that someone with a college education (that is, someone with 16 years of schooling) will live? E. A researcher wants to know if there is a relationship between year in college (X) (1=freshman, 2=sophomore, 3=junior, 4=senior) and percent of class lectures attended (Y). For a sample of 10 students, the following results are obtained: ΣX = 23 ΣY = 730 ΣXY = 1630 ΣX2 = 65 ΣY2 = 54100 X̅ = 2.3 Y̅ = 73 Σ(Y-Y̅)2 = 810 Σ(Ŷ-Y̅)2 = 198.3 Σ(Y-Ŷ)2 = 611.7 1.Compute the correlation coefficient between year in college and percent of class lectures attended. What does this value tell us? 2.Using a significance level of .05, test the null hypothesis that, in the population, the correlation between year in college and percent of class lectures attended is zero. E. (continued) 3.Compute and interpret the coefficient of determination (R2). F. Whenever we look at the relationship between two variables (regardless of the level of measurement of those variables), we are interested in two aspects of that relationship. What are those two "aspects" and why is each important? (You can discuss more than two if you feel it necessary).
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134641287
Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ1
Related questions
Question
C. To test the null hypothesis that computer programmers' college major is not related to their programming capabilities, the work of 100 randomly chosen programmers was rated as either weak or strong. The following crosstabulation was obtained:
Programming Capability
Major WeakStrong
Humanities:1212
Science:1224
Business:2416
1.If the null hypothesis is correct, how many Business majors with weak programming capability would we expect to find in our sample? (That is, what is the expected frequency for that cell?)
2.The computed value of χ2 (chi-square) for this table is 5.45. Should the null hypothesis be rejected at the .05 level of significance? (Be sure to show the statistics that lead to your decision.)
3.Treating college major as the independent variable, calculate and interpret an appropriate measure of association.
4.Using and reporting the appropriate percentages, show which major has the strongest programming capability.
D. Suppose you are interested in the relationship between educational attainment (measured by years of completed schooling) and the how long people live (measured by age at death in years). For a sample of 100 recently-deceased people, you collect information on their educational attainment and their age at death. Treating educational attainment as the independent variable (X) and age at death as the dependent variable (Y), you compute the following regression equation.
Y = 55 + 2.0X + e
1.Interpret in words this equation. That is, what do each of the numerical values in the equation tell us? Be specific.
2.How long would you predict that someone with a college education (that is, someone with 16 years of schooling) will live?
E. A researcher wants to know if there is a relationship between year in college (X) (1=freshman, 2=sophomore, 3=junior, 4=senior) and percent of class lectures attended (Y). For a sample of 10 students, the following results are obtained:
ΣX = 23
ΣY = 730
ΣXY = 1630
ΣX2 = 65
ΣY2 = 54100
X̅ = 2.3
Y̅ = 73
Σ(Y-Y̅)2 = 810
Σ(Ŷ-Y̅)2 = 198.3
Σ(Y-Ŷ)2 = 611.7
1.Compute the correlation coefficient between year in college and percent of class lectures attended. What does this value tell us?
2.Using a significance level of .05, test the null hypothesis that, in the population, the correlation between year in college and percent of class lectures attended is zero.
E. (continued)
3.Compute and interpret the coefficient of determination (R2).
F. Whenever we look at the relationship between two variables (regardless of the level of measurement of those variables), we are interested in two aspects of that relationship. What are those two "aspects" and why is each important? (You can discuss more than two if you feel it necessary).
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134641287
Author:
Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:
Pearson College Div
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780393639407
Author:
Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
Sociology
ISBN:
9781305503076
Author:
Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134641287
Author:
Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:
Pearson College Div
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780393639407
Author:
Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
Sociology
ISBN:
9781305503076
Author:
Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134477596
Author:
Saferstein, Richard
Publisher:
PEARSON
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134205571
Author:
James M. Henslin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134206325
Author:
John J. Macionis
Publisher:
PEARSON