By knowing the Pearl Harbor attack from American point of view and from Japanese point of view, what do you think of the following points: 1. Should national histories be biased for the country in which they are written? 2. When history is designed to create a sense of patriotism in a country's population, does it become flawed? Shouldn't history be more concerned about the retelling of the past rather than the effect it produces in those who study it? 3. What does it mean when Filipinos seem more familiar with the American version of the second world war than they are with their own stories of the war?

icon
Related questions
Question

By knowing the Pearl Harbor attack from American point of view and from Japanese point of view, what do you think of the following points:

1. Should national histories be biased for the country in which they are written?

2. When history is designed to create a sense of patriotism in a country's population, does it become flawed? Shouldn't history be more concerned about the retelling of the past rather than the effect it produces in those who study it?

3. What does it mean when Filipinos seem more familiar with the American version of the second world war than they are with their own stories of the war?

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer