Bacterial resistant is big problems, How to avoid such a problem?

TRY TO KEEP IN SHORT AND USE OWN WORD FOR THIS QUESTION You are studying a type of bacteria isolated from the acidic water runoff of a mining operation. You subject two batches of the same bacteria type to different environmental growth conditions. One batch is grown at pH 2, while the other is grown at pH 7. All other environmental parameters are kept identical between the two batches. You then collect their proteins and run a Western blot using an antibody that binds to a proton efflux pump protein (which actively expends energy to pump protons out of a cell). How would you characterize the information obtained in this experiment? What does it tell you, and why is that potentially valuable information?

One of the early results shows that the post-centrifugation pellet of encapsulated cells also contains EA1 and/or Sap. Why is this not proof that Bacillus anthracis cells have both an S-layer and a capsule simultaneously? I need help finding the answer in the article and explain in short answer  link to article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC106848/

One of the early results shows that the post-centrifugation pellet of encapsulated cells also contains EA1 and/or Sap. Why is this not proof that Bacillus anthracis cells have both an S-layer and a capsule simultaneously? I need help finding the answer in the article and explain in short answer  link to article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC106848/

The table below shows the response of our ESKAPE safe relatives to 4 bacteria isolated from a master grid. We do not know the identity or any characteristics of the unknown bacteria. Each safe relative was spread onto a petri dish using aseptic technique. A grid pattern was taped to each plate and the unknown bacteria were patched into one of the squares. If there was no inhibition visible, including with a magnifying lens, the result was listed as -. If there was an inhibition zone between 1 and 10mm in diameter, the result is listed as +. If the inhibition zone was 10mm or greater, the result is listed as ++. In the lab, the MGC instructors plated all 6 of the ESKAPE pathogen safe relatives on LB agar plates. Then we patched Unknown Bacteria 5 from a Master plate onto the safe relative. The results are shown here: METRIC METRIC METRIC 1 B. subtilis S. epidermidis E. coli Complete the final column (Unknown Bacteria 5) of the table by selecting -, +, or ++ using the criteria in the…

describe a semi-synthetic antibiotic

Is it important to have fewer phages than bacterial host cells when doing a quantitative plaque assay? Explain.

Why is antibiotic resistance a problem and how can antibiotic resistance be prevented? (List the 7 methods for preventing resistance.)

Does the addition of E. coli change the dilution in the calculation of PFU/mL in the original phage sample? Why/Why not?

What is the purpose of using Triton X in hemolytic assay.