At the end of a cross-sectional looking at the relationship between healthy eating (exposure) and diabetes (outcome), which of the following values of prevalence ratio will be the most likely? a. 2.0 b. 2.5 c. 0.7 d. 1.0

At the end of a cross-sectional looking at the relationship between healthy eating (exposure) and diabetes (outcome), which of the following values of prevalence ratio will be the most likely? a. 2.0 b. 2.5 c. 0.7 d. 1.0

Nutrition Now

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337415408

Author:Brown

Publisher:Brown

Chapter3: Ways Of Knowing About Nutrition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 11RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In a recently published case control study, the researcher reported an odds ratio of 3.55 (95% CI 1.88-5.4). This indicates that the OR is significant and the associated p=value is less than 0.05. A. TrueB. False please explain the reasoning behind the answer, thank you!
he first involved an assessment of the relationship between cigarette smoking and incidence of lung cancer. For cigarette smokers, the lung cancer incidence rate was Ie = 200 per 100,000. For nonsmokers, the lung cancer incidence rate was Io = 25 per 100,000. The lung cancer incidence rate in the entire population was It = 100 per 100,000. The second study involved an assessment of the relationship between cigarette smoking and incidence of coronary heart disease. For cigarette smokers, the coronary heart disease incidence rate was Ie = 500 per 100,000. For nonsmokers, it was Io = 250 per 100,000. In the overall population, the coronary heart disease rate was It = 300. 1. What is relative risk the of developing lung cancer in the first study and of developing coronary heart disease in the second study? Interpret. 2. From the data involving cigarette smoking and lung cancer incidence, what are the attributable risk and the attributable-risk percent? Interpret the result. 3. From the…
When a 95% confidence interval is calculated there is a 95% probability that the next measurement will fall within this range. there is a 95% probability that the true value is within this range. there no chance of having false positives within that range. 1) 1, 2, & 3 2) 2 only 3) 2 & 3 4) 1 only 5) 1 & 2
What is the default setting for confidence level for 23andMe? (Meaning, what percent sure is the company of your results?) A. 50% B. 75% C. 90% D. 100%
Using the Public Health Model, describe how one could quantify the risk to a Beatrice employee, with a genetic heart condition, who smokes and lives in Woburn?
QUESTION 1 Match each description to the correct study design. Study designs may be used more than once. ◆ Incidence data is not available with this study design, so an odds ratio is an appropriate measure of association to calculate. ◆ This study design allows for the evaluation of multiple outcomes. ◆ The temporal sequence between the exposure and outcome is clear for this study design; therefore, incidence data is available and a risk ratio can be calculated. ◆ With this study design, exposure status is assessed, and then participants are followed up over time to see who develops the outcome. ◆ Recall bias is a common issue with this study design because exposure information is collected from the past. QUESTION 2 A. Cohort study B. Case-control study Consider the following scenario for the questions that follow. In a recent case-control study, investigators enrolled 300 adults with heart disease and 300 healthy adults. During interviews with the participants, the investigators…
There is a population with 1 Gg, 1 gg, and 10 GG genotypes. What is the frequency of the gg genotype? A. 0.12 b. 0.20 c. 0.08 d. 0.04 e. There is no way to calculate
Suppose a study looking at the association between smoking and bladder cancer found an odds ratio = 2.4. What would be the best way to interpret this? (Select one answer.) Smokers are 140% times as likely to develop bladder cancer compared to non-smokers. People with bladder cancer are about 40% more likely to be smokers compared to people who don't have bladder cancer. Smokers have a 2.4 % more risk of bladder cancer compared to nonsmokers. Smokers have 2.4 times the risk of developing bladder cancer compared to non-smokers.
A study of smoking and lung cancer was conducted in a small island population. There were a total of 1,000 people in the study, and the study participants were followed over a ten year period. Four hundred were smokers and 600 were not. Of the smokers, fifty developed lung cancer. Of the non-smokers, 10 developed lung cancer. Calculate the relevant measure of association, interpret and make a conclusion. Compute Attributable Risk and interpret . Describe the difference between incidence rate and the prevalence rate.
Give typed explanation Which term best fits the following definition, “The degree to which an observed significant change in an impact (e.g., attitude, knowledge, behavior) or outcome (e.g., health status) rate attributable to a health education/promotion intervention can be generalized from a representative sample to a large, well-defined population at risk.” a. Effectiveness b. Efficacy c. External validity d. Internal validity e. Process evaluation
You read a study in which 55 male participants (aged 55-70 years) were assessed for handgrip strength, and changes in cardiovascular health over a 2-year period. In the statistical analysis section of the paper you note that the researchers used regression analysis as the statistical procedure. The researchers identify the independent variable as handgrip strength, and the dependent variable as change in cardiovascular health. What do you think the research question could be?You read a study in which 55 male participants (aged 55-70 years) were assessed for handgrip strength, and changes in cardiovascular health over a 2-year period. In the statistical analysis section of the paper you note that the researchers used regression analysis as the statistical procedure. The researchers identify the independent variable as handgrip strength, and the dependent variable as change in cardiovascular health. What do you think the research question could be? Select one: a. Does handgrip strength…
Mean 2728 14588026 Median 5 27078 Mode 4 22748 Excluded maximum value Mean 2680 75854 Excluded maximum value Median 195.5 32693.1875 Excluded maximum value Mode 75854.99742 14134737.32 Did the Mean, Median or Mode change more by excluding the maximum value? Explain Why What is the best statistic (Mean, Median, or Mode) to describe the typical: LOS/Charge Explain Why Admission Source Explain Why Gender Explain Why Discharge Status Explain Why Section 2 Variance 3.03 Excluded maximum value Variance Range Excluded maximum value Range Did the variance and range change…