also option We should not reject the null hypothesis because t0>tα. So, at the 10% significance level, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the average length of time between dentist visits is less than 193days. As a part of her studies, Jamie gathered data on the length of time between dentist visits for a sample of 20 individuals. Sheworks through the testing procedure:0: μ193; Ha : μ < 193. The test statistic isx_Ho 0.455· The critical value is-t0.1-1.328At the 10% significance level, does the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean length of time betweendentist visits is less than 193 days?Select the correct answer below:O We should reject the null hypothesis because to4. So, at the 10% significance level, the data provide sufficientevidence to conclude that the average length of time between dentist visits is less than 193 days.OWe should not reject the null hypothesis because ț0 〈α. So, at the 10% significance level, the data do notprovide sufficient evidence to conclude that the average length of time between dentist visits is less than 193daysO We should reject the null hypothesis because to4. So, at the 10% significance level, the data provide sufficientevidence to conclude that the average length of time between dentist visits is less than 193 days.

Name: also option We should not reject the null hypothesis because t0>tα. S
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: also option We should not reject the null hypothesis because t0>tα. So, at the 10% significance level, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the average length of time between dentist visits is less than 193days. As a part of