answer the following questions regarding the matrix below, which represents the strategic nteraction between the two largest movie production studios, Universal Pictures and 20th Century ox. They are each deciding the release dates for their own summer blockbuster action movies. They can release their movies in June, July, or August. Because of limited demand for going to the novies, each firm would generally rather release their movies earlier than later. Similarly, they would rather not release their movies at the same time, as it dilutes the demand for their movies. The matrix form of the game is as follows: Universal June July August June 5,5 4,6 7,8 Fox July 6,4 5,5 4,6 August 8,6 6,5 5,4 ) Suppose Universal and Fox make their decisions simultaneously. Are there any Nash equilibria? If so, what are they? Show your work. ) Suppose they move sequentially, and that Fox moves first. First set up the game tree. What will be the equilibrium path of the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome? Would Fox want this to happen? Explain intuitively why or why not.

answer the following questions regarding the matrix below, which represents the strategic nteraction between the two largest movie production studios, Universal Pictures and 20th Century ox. They are each deciding the release dates for their own summer blockbuster action movies. They can release their movies in June, July, or August. Because of limited demand for going to the novies, each firm would generally rather release their movies earlier than later. Similarly, they would rather not release their movies at the same time, as it dilutes the demand for their movies. The matrix form of the game is as follows: Universal June July August June 5,5 4,6 7,8 Fox July 6,4 5,5 4,6 August 8,6 6,5 5,4 ) Suppose Universal and Fox make their decisions simultaneously. Are there any Nash equilibria? If so, what are they? Show your work. ) Suppose they move sequentially, and that Fox moves first. First set up the game tree. What will be the equilibrium path of the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome? Would Fox want this to happen? Explain intuitively why or why not.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Read-a-lot Bookstore and Frontier Books are competitors in the Carlton retail book market. Each has a choice of setting a low price or high price. The payoffs from the price choices are: Assume that the game is played sequentially with Frontier making a decision about its choice of price strategy, and then Read-a-lot, after observing Frontier’s strategy, chooses its price strategy. What is the best choice for Frontier? [To answer this question, you need to take into account your answer for question 1 regarding the best strategy for Read-a-Lot.] a. Low price b. High price c. Frontier is indifferent between High price and Low price d. It is not possible to identify a best choice for Frontier.
Suppose that U.S.-based Qualcomm and European-based T-Mobile are contemplating infrastructure investments in a developing mobile telephone market. Qualcomm presently uses a code-division multiple access (CDMA) technology, which almost 67 million users in the United States utilize. In contrast, T-Mobile uses a global systems for mobile communication (GSM) technology that has become the standard in Europe and Asia. Each company must (simultaneously and independently) decide which of these two technologies to introduce in the new market. Qualcomm estimates that it will cost $1.2 billion to install its CDMA technology and $2.0 billion to install GSM technology. T-Mobile's projected cost of installing GSM technology is $1.1 billion, while the cost of installing the CDMA technology is $2.7 billion. As shown in the accompanying table, each company's projected revenues depend not only on the technology it adopts, but also on that adopted by its rival: Projected Revenues for Different…
Suppose that Snapface and Instashot are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell polaroid cameras. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for cameras. Snapface Pricing High Low For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Snapface prices low and Instashot prices high, Snapface will earn a profit of $18 million, and Instashot will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Snapface and Instashot are both profit-maximizing firms. Instashot Pricing High Low 11, 11 2, 18 18, 2 10, 10 If Snapface prices high, Instashot will make more profit if it chooses a high price, and if Snapface prices low, Instashot will make more profit if it chooses a price. If Instashot prices high, Snapface will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a ▼ price. Considering all of the information given, pricing high If the firms do not collude,…
Google and Microsoft are the two dominant firms in the internet search market. They each must decide on whether to have a large budget for research and development (R&D). Their respective payoffs are in the following matrix: Google Microsoft Large R& D Small R& D Large R& D +$30m 0 What is the Nash equilibrium? +$20m +$30m Small R& D +$70m +$50m 0 +$40m Both google and Microsoft have small R&D budgets. There is not a Nash equilibrium because both firms don't have a dominant strategy. Both google and Microsoft have large R&D budgets. Google has a large, and Microsoft a small, R&D budgets.
Two airplane manufacturers are considering the production of a new jet. Both are deciding whether to enter the market and produce the new planes. Market demand is large enough to support only one manufacturer and the payoff matrix is as follows. Both Airbus and Boeing can get perfect information on the profits of their competitor. Airbus Don't produce Airbus gets zero profit Produce Airbus loses $5M| Produce Boeing loses $5M Boeing gets $100M profit Вoeing Airbus gets $100M profit Airbus gets zero profit Don't produce Boeing gets zero profit Boeing gets zero profit A1. Use the information from the matrix to select the best strategy for Airbus and Boeing. Boeing Produce, Airbus Produce (one dominant strategy) Boeing Produce, Airbus Don’t Produce (one dominant strategy) Boeing Don't Produce, Airbus Produce (one dominant strategy) Boeing Don't Produce, Airbus Don't Produce (one dominant strategy) There isn't one dominant strategy A2. Identify any Nash equilibria. There are no Nash…
Economics Consider an infinitely repeated game played between two firms with the following payoffs (firm 1 is listed first): · (250, 290) if both firms deviate · (290, 330) if both firms cooperate · (230, 370) if only firm 2 deviates · (350, 270) if only firm 1 deviates a. What probability-adjusted discount factor would ensure that Firm 1 would cooperate in a Nash equilibrium if Firm 2 applied a trigger strategy in the event that Firm 1 deviated? b. What probability-adjusted discount factor would ensure that Firm 2 would cooperate in a Nash equilibrium if Firm 1 applied a trigger strategy in the event that Firm 2 deviated?
Suppose that U.S.-based Qualcomm and European-based T-Mobile are contemplating infrastructure investments in a developing mobile telephone market. Qualcomm currently uses a code-division multiple access (CDMA) technology, which almost 67 million users in the United States utilize. In contrast, T-Mobile uses a global systems for mobile communication (GSM) technology that has become the standard in Europe and Asia. Each company must (simultaneously and independently) decide which of these two technologies to introduce in the new market. Qualcomm estimates that it will cost $1.2 billion to install its CDMA technology and $2.0 billion to install GSM technology. T-Mobile’s projected cost of installing GSM technology is $1.1 billion, while the cost of installing the CDMA technology is $2.7 billion. As shown in the accompanying table, each company’s projected revenues depend not only on the technology it adopts, but also on that adopted by its rival.Construct the normal form of this game.…
Refer to the normal-form game of price competition in the payoff matrix below Firm B Low Price High Price Firm A Low Price 0, 0 50, −10 High Price −10, 50 20, 20 Suppose the game is infinitely repeated, and the interest rate is 20 percent. Both firms agree to charge a high price, provided no player has charged a low price in the past. This collusive outcome will be implemented with a trigger strategy that states that if any firm cheats, then the agreement is no longer valid, and each firm may make independent decisions. Will the trigger strategy be effective in implementing the collusive agreement? Please explain and show all necessary calculations.
[The soft drink industry is dominated by two cola firms- DEW and HEW. The market is worth $8 billion. Each firm can decide whether to advertise or not, but advertising costs $2 billion to any firm undertaking it. Moreover, advertising will create only negligible new demand as the market is already saturated. So, for the purpose of this question, assume that the market remains at $8 billion regardless of advertising. If one firm advertises and the other does not, then the former captures the whole market. If both firms advertise, then DEW captures 60% of the market and HEW captures 40% of the market, but the advertising must be paid for. If neither firm advertises, then the market is again split 60:40, with 60% going to DEW and 40% to HEW.] Draw the payoff matrix for this game where each player’s payoff is equal to the value of market it captures less the cost of advertisement. (please explain how you calculate the payoff matrix)
Consider a strategic interaction between firms 1 and 2. In Stage 1, firm 1 chooses the level of advertising a > 0. In stage 2, firm 2 learns about firm 1's amount of advertising a. Subsequently, firms 1 and 2 compete in a Cournot fashion. That is, firms 1 and 2 simultaneously and independently choose their outputs: q1 and q2, where qi denotes the output of firm i = 1,2. The price that the consumers are willing to pay for the product produced by the two firms, or the inverse aggregate demand function, is given by 6a - q1 - q2. Firm 1's advertising cost is a3. Both firms have zero production costs. Both firms maximize their individual profits (equal to the total revenue minus total cost). In the unique subgame perfect equilibrium of the game, the two firms will choose the following strategies: a. Firm 1 will choose strategy (a = 3, q1 = a/3) while firm 2 will choose strategy q2 = a/3 b. Firm 1 will choose strategy (a = 1, q1 = 16/3 ) while firm 2 will choose strategy q2 = 16/3 c. Firm 1…
Consider an oligopoly with three firms that produce a homogeneous product. The market demand for the industry is Q = 120 - P. Market supply is determined by the output decisions of the firms. That is, Q = q1 + q2 + q3, where qi is the output of firm i. Each firm can produce at zero cost, and the firms behave non-cooperatively in deciding their output levels.A) Find the Cournot equilibria in this industry.B) What are the profits of each firm?C) Would (any) two firms have an incentive to merge, effectively converting the industry into a duopoly? (Justify your answer.)