Google and Microsoft are the two dominant firms in the internet search market. They each must decide onwhether to have a large budget for research and development (R&D). Their respective payoffs are in thefollowing matrix:GoogleMicrosoftLargeR&DSmallR&DLarge R& D+$30m0What is the Nash equilibrium?+$20m+$30mSmall R& D+$70m+$50m0+$40mBoth google and Microsoft have small R&D budgets.There is not a Nash equilibrium because both firms don't have a dominant strategy.Both google and Microsoft have large R&D budgets.Google has a large, and Microsoft a small, R&D budgets.

A Nash equilibrium is a concept in game theory that occurs when each player in a game chooses the…

Google and Microsoft are the two dominant firms in the internet search market. They each must decide on whether to have a large budget for research and development (R&D). Their respective payoffs are in the following matrix: Google Microsoft Large R& D Small DI Large R& D +$30m +$20m +$30m Small R& D +$70m 0 +$40m

Google and Microsoft are the two dominant firms in the internet search market. They each must decide on whether to have a large budget for research and development (R&D). Their respective payoffs are in the following matrix: Google Microsoft Large R& D Small DI Large R& D +$30m +$20m +$30m Small R& D +$70m 0 +$40m

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Synergy's Decision Large Budget Small Budget Large Budget $20 million, $25 million $15 million, $0 Dynaco's Decision Small Budget $0. $60 million $25 million, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a v budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will choose a v budget. Therefore, Synergy v a dominant strategy. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a v budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.) O True O False
Answer the following questions regarding the matrix below, which represents the strategic interaction between the two largest movie production studios, Universal Pictures and 20th Century Fox. They are each deciding the release dates for their own summer blockbuster action movies. They can release their movies in June, July, or August. Because of limited demand for going to the movies, each firm would generally rather release their movies earlier than later. Similarly, they would rather not release their movies at the same time, as it dilutes the demand for their movies. The matrix form of the game is as follows: Universal June July August June 5,5 4,6 7,8 Fox July 6,4 5,5 4,6 August 8,6 6,5 5,4 d) Suppose Universal and Fox make their decisions simultaneously. Are there any Nash equilibria? If so, what are they? Show your work. e) Suppose they move sequentially, and that Fox moves first. First set up the game tree. What will be the equilibrium path of the subgame perfect Nash…
There are two firms competing in the market for Airplanes - Boeing (B) and Airbus (A). The market demand is given by Q = 120 - p. Their marginal cost are as follows: MCB = $20, MCA = $40. (Think of price being in millions.) How many airplanes did Boeing sell in this Airplane (please put your answer in numerical values with no comma or decimal place). How many airplanes did Airbus sell in this Airplane market? (please put your answer in numerical values with no comma or decimal place). What is the total quantities of airplanes sold in the market? (please put your market? answer in numerical values with no comma or decimal place) What is the equilibrium price in millions? million (please put your answer in numerical values with no dollar sign, comma or decimal place). What is Boeing's profit in millions? million (please put your answer in numerical values with no dollar sign, comma or decimal place). What million (please put your answer in numerical values with no dollar (please put is…
Suppose that there are two competing types of high-definition DVD players, Greenbeam and Mosdef, and each uses a different format. The DVD players are subject to network externalities: the more people who use one type of player, the more production companies adopt that particular format for their movies, and the greater the value of that player to each user. Greenbeam and Mosdef entered the market at around the same time. Which of the following is likely to happen if Greenbeam sells its DVD players at its profit-maximizing price, but Mosdef sells its DVD players at a much lower price than Greenbeam's at the early stages? O Mosdef will dominate the market for high-definition DVD players. O Greenbeam will dominate the market for high-definition DVD players. Greenbeam and Mosdef will have equal market shares. O Neither Greenbeam nor Mosdef will succeed, and a new company could easily enter and dominate the market. OO
Please answer clearly from 2. i to iii.
Three oligopolistic banks operate in the loan market with the inverse demand functiongiven by r (Q) = a-Q, where r is the interest rate per unit of loan and Q = q1 +q2 +q3and qi>=0 is the total amount of loans issued by bank i = 1, 2, 3. Also, a > 0 is aconstant. The cost of funds for bank i is given by cqi, where c belongs (0, a) is a constant.A bank's profit from loans is (r -c)qi. (1) Suppose the banks engage in Cournot competition. Find the symmetricNash equilibrium. How much profit does each bank make? (2) Now suppose banks compete in the following sequential manner: Bank1 chooses q1. Then banks 2 and 3 observe q1 and then simultaneously choose q2and q3, respectively. Find the subgame perfect equilibrium. How much profit doeseach bank make here? Does bank 1 enjoy an advantage being the first mover?
Problem 3 Consider the infinitely repeated game with the discount factor & € (0, 1) of the following Cournot duopoly model with inverse demand function P(Q) = a Q if Q≤ a 0 if Q > a where Q = 91 +92 and cost functions Ci(qi) = cqi, i = 1,2. The profit function of firm i is given by Ti (91, 92) = qiP(9₁ +92) - cqi. Consider the following grim-trigger strategy. Produce half the monopoly output in the first period and as long as everybody has produced that amount so far. Otherwise produce the Cournot output. Verify that this is a subgame perfect equilibrium.
The payoff matrix of economic profits, below, displays the possible outcomes for Coles (C) and Woolworth (W) who are involved in a game of whether to implement or not implement new warehouse technologies. The payoffs in dollars are indicated in the matrix below, and the companies are unable to communicate with each other. Coles (C) Implement Not Implement C: $30 million C: $10 million Implement W: $30 million W: $30 million Woolworth (W) C: $20 million C: $10 million Not Implement W: $10 million W: $20 million (a) With reference to the payoff matrix, work out whether each company has a dominant strategy and what that dominant strategy is, if it exists. (b) Explain with reference to the above scenario, what the Nash Equilibrium is, if there is any? (c) Is this a Prisoner's dilemma game? Explain why or why not.
On January 1st, 2022 every economics major at NYU had to choose one of the following two options: (a) take $10 today, (b) forgo $10 today, and get $15 on December 31st, 2022. Suppose John Doe, chose option (a), and picked up $10 on January 1st. Use this information to solve for John’s minimum discount rate. (Recall, r is the discount rate and (1 + r) is the discount factor.) Given the information above, what do we know about the discount rate of Jane Doe if she chose option (b)?
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
please answer all of the questions. thank youuu
Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high-tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they decide upon the size of their research budget: Dynaco's Decision Synergy's Decision Large Budget Large Budget $30 million, $20 million Small Budget $0, $30 million If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Synergy believes Dynaco will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Synergy a dominant strategy. O True Small Budget $70 million, $0 $50 million, $40 million If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a large budget, it will choose a budget. If Dynaco believes Synergy will go with a small budget, it will choose a budget. Therefore, Dynaco a dominant strategy. O False True or False: There is a Nash equilibrium for this scenario. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)