Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Business Law
An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous.   Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements;  1. On These six applicable case  law on the subject matter:  Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1892)  Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) Basic facts Harvey v. Facey (1893) Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v. McLean (1880)  Routledge v. Grant (1828)  Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd (1953)  2. Thoroughly and in full detail explain   • The issue  • Basic facts of the Cases  • The Judgement​   Note.  • You cannot copy and paste the various cases. • You are required to discuss via a few paragraphs, what was the issue, basic facts and the judgement.  • Conclude by applying the mentioned cases to the issue at hand in respect of question above.    Requirements The answer should include, an introduction as well as a conclusion in respect of both questions.

An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous.   Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements;  1. On These six applicable case  law on the subject matter:  Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1892)  Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) Basic facts Harvey v. Facey (1893) Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v. McLean (1880)  Routledge v. Grant (1828)  Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd (1953)  2. Thoroughly and in full detail explain   • The issue  • Basic facts of the Cases  • The Judgement​   Note.  • You cannot copy and paste the various cases. • You are required to discuss via a few paragraphs, what was the issue, basic facts and the judgement.  • Conclude by applying the mentioned cases to the issue at hand in respect of question above.    Requirements The answer should include, an introduction as well as a conclusion in respect of both questions.

icon
Related questions
Question

An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous.

 

Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements; 

1. On These six applicable case  law on the subject matter: 

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1892) 

Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) Basic facts

Harvey v. Facey (1893)

Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v. McLean (1880) 

Routledge v. Grant (1828) 

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd (1953) 

2. Thoroughly and in full detail explain 

 • The issue 

• Basic facts of the Cases

 • The Judgement​

 

Note.

 • You cannot copy and paste the various cases.

• You are required to discuss via a few paragraphs, what was the issue, basic facts and the judgement.

 • Conclude by applying the mentioned cases to the issue at hand in respect of question above. 

 

Requirements The answer should include, an introduction as well as a conclusion in respect of both questions.

Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer