An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements; Five (5) applicable case laws on the subject matter. State clearly The issue Basic facts of the Cases The Judgement

An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements; Five (5) applicable case laws on the subject matter. State clearly The issue Basic facts of the Cases The Judgement

Similar questions

What is the term for a minor choosing to proceed with the contract and the term for a minor choosing to void the contract? Select one: tion O a. disaffirmance & ratification O b. acceptance & appeal O C. acceptance & denial O d. execution & dismissal
Oxy Corp. is negotiating with Wick Construction Co. for the renovation of Oxy’s corporate headquarters. Wick, the owner of Wick Construction Co., is also one of the five members of Oxy’s board of directors. The contract terms are standard for this type of contract. Wick has previously informed two of the other directors of his interest in the construction company. Oxy’s board approves the contract by a three-to-two vote, with Wick voting with the majority. Question: Should the contract between Oxy Corp and Wick Construction corp. be set aside or is it binding? What would have been the proper way for Wick to conduct himself at the Oxy board meeting?
16. Why are restrictive covenant clauses controversial? They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms that restrict their future right to alter those same contracts They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms below the otherwise legislated minimum standards of work They are controversial because they seem to pit two legitimate interest against each other: the right of trade against the right of contract
Summarize the account of conflict of interest we have examined in the readings. Second, argue whether the case of Qual Plus HMO contains a conflict of interest and, if so, who faces them. Finally, discuss the methods of addressing conflicts of interest and propose a resolution to the conflicts of interest in the case and a discussion of the moral status of the people involved in the case. Your discussion must include: An introduction An account of the meaning of “conflict of interest An argument for whether or not the case contains conflicts of interest, and why An account of methods for addressing conflicts of interest An application of the methods to the case A conclusions
When a party to a lawsuit for breach of contract files pleadings, they must conform to which set of rules? Multiple Choice The Rules of Civil Litigation The Federal Rules of Contracts The Federal Rules of Evidence The Rules of Civil Procedure
a. Provide a reasonable textbook definition of what intoxication in law means with the use of examples. b. Use your critical analysis skill to explain how a person can avoid a contract entered into under intoxication. Use the case laws below and state the issue, facts, and judgment of them. Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co. (1935) Jackson v. Alexander (1879) Matthews v. Baxter (1873)
Anticipatory repudiation can occur in which of the following ways? I. A statement by one party of its intent not to perform. II. An action by the promisor that rendered performance impossible. III. Knowledge by the parties that one party may be unable to perform despite both parties' efforts. IV. After a contract has been discharged. Multiple Choice II and III. I and II. I and III. III and IV. I, II, and III.
29 of 75 If a buyer does not make inspections during the inspection period, the standard purchase and sale agreement automatically extends the inspection period unless the seller objects. requires the buyer to accept the property "as is." requires the seller to have the inspections performed at the buyer's expense. states that the closing date will be postponed subject to negotiation.
Sometimes an issur with a property is discovered during the pre-closing stage. Buyers may be willing to accept deficiencies if they an compensate through a price reduction. Which of the following is correct regarding adjusting a purchase price to offset a deflciency.Select one: O. The value of the price adjustment may become a matter of negotiations between the parties. O. A new agreement of purchase and sale must be drafted and signed to finalize the price adjustment. O. A formal appraisal is always required to determine the adjusted purchase price. O. Buyers are contractually obligated to negotiate an adjusted purchase price.
Please don't give image format and no chatgpt answer
Summarize the account of conflict of interest we have examined in the readings. Second, argue whether the case of Qual Plus HMO contains a conflict of interest and, if so, who faces them. Finally, discuss the methods of addressing conflicts of interest and propose a resolution to the conflicts of interest in the case and a discussion of the moral status of the people involved in the case. Your discussion must include: An introduction An account of the meaning of “conflict of interest An argument for whether or not the case contains conflicts of interest, and why An account of methods for addressing conflicts of interest An application of the methods to the case A conclusion