An entomologist rights an article in a scientific journal which claims that fewer than 17 in 10,000 male fire flies are unable to produce light due to a genetic mutation. Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis, state the conclusion in non-technical terms. Be sure to address the original claim. O A. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.O B. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.O C. There is sufficient sample evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.O D. There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.

Name: An entomologist rights an article in a scientific journal which claims
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: An entomologist rights an article in a scientific journal which claims that fewer than 17 in 10,000 male fire flies are unable to produce light due to a genetic mutation. Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the co

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/b6ef30a1-b96e-4d3b-b9c4-33a4d0381918.jpg

Answered: An entomologist rights an article in a…

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Concept explainers

Topic Video

Question

An entomologist rights an article in a scientific journal which claims that fewer than 17 in 10,000 male fire flies are unable to produce light due to a genetic mutation. Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis, state the conclusion in non-technical terms. Be sure to address the original claim.

O A. There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.
O B. There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.
O C. There is sufficient sample evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.
O D. There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 17 in ten thousand.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

$Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions$

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions