According to Calhoun, in what cases could states nullify federal laws? 2. Why was the Tariff of 1828 unpopular?

icon
Related questions
Question
1. According to Calhoun, in what cases could states nullify federal laws? 2. Why was the Tariff of 1828 unpopular?
**Andrew Jackson’s Presidency: Nullification Crisis**

**Context:** The crisis over the *Tariff of 1828* continued into the 1830s and highlighted one of the currents of democracy in the *Age of Jackson*: namely, that many southerners believed a Jacksonian democratic majority could be harmful to their interests. Jackson believed in enforcing a strong central government, and southerners claimed the right of states to nullify federal laws that appeared to threaten state sovereignty.

The *Tariff of 1828* (nicknamed Tariff of Abominations) had driven Vice President Calhoun to argue that if a national majority acted against the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void—or nullify—federal law. By the early 1830s, the battle over the tariff took on new urgency as the price of cotton continued to fall. In 1818, cotton had been thirty-one cents per pound. By 1831, it had sunk to eight cents per pound. While production of cotton had soared during this time and increased contributed to the decline in prices, many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank.

**Diagram Explanation:**

The image is a political cartoon titled "Nullification Crisis: Title Bout – Jackson vs Calhoun." It depicts a boxing ring with two figures representing Andrew Jackson and John C. Calhoun in boxing poses, symbolizing the conflict over the nullification crisis. Jackson is associated with federal authority, while Calhoun is aligned with state rights. The cartoon portrays the tension between federal and state powers during this period. A referee labeled "Force Bill" stands between the two figures, emphasizing the conflict over federal law enforcement.
Transcribed Image Text:**Andrew Jackson’s Presidency: Nullification Crisis** **Context:** The crisis over the *Tariff of 1828* continued into the 1830s and highlighted one of the currents of democracy in the *Age of Jackson*: namely, that many southerners believed a Jacksonian democratic majority could be harmful to their interests. Jackson believed in enforcing a strong central government, and southerners claimed the right of states to nullify federal laws that appeared to threaten state sovereignty. The *Tariff of 1828* (nicknamed Tariff of Abominations) had driven Vice President Calhoun to argue that if a national majority acted against the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void—or nullify—federal law. By the early 1830s, the battle over the tariff took on new urgency as the price of cotton continued to fall. In 1818, cotton had been thirty-one cents per pound. By 1831, it had sunk to eight cents per pound. While production of cotton had soared during this time and increased contributed to the decline in prices, many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank. **Diagram Explanation:** The image is a political cartoon titled "Nullification Crisis: Title Bout – Jackson vs Calhoun." It depicts a boxing ring with two figures representing Andrew Jackson and John C. Calhoun in boxing poses, symbolizing the conflict over the nullification crisis. Jackson is associated with federal authority, while Calhoun is aligned with state rights. The cartoon portrays the tension between federal and state powers during this period. A referee labeled "Force Bill" stands between the two figures, emphasizing the conflict over federal law enforcement.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer