According to a report on consumer fraud and identity theft, 24% of all complaints for a year were for identity theft. In that year, Connecticut had 861 complaints of identity theft out of 3484 consumer complaints. Does this data provide enough evidence to show that Connecticut had a higher proportion of identity theft than 24% ? Test at the 10% level. State the hypotheses. Ho: P ?o Ha: P ?o Calculate the test statistic. Round to four decimal places. p= Calculate the standardized test statistic. Round to three decimal places. z = Find the p-value. Round to four decimal places. p-value= State your decision. Since the p-value is greater than .10, reject Ho Since the p-value is less than .10, fail to reject Ho. O Since the p-value is greater than .10, fail to reject Ho O Since the p-value is less than .10, reject Ho. Interpret the results. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%. At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is not equal to 24%. At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is not equal to 24%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%.
According to a report on consumer fraud and identity theft, 24% of all complaints for a year were for identity theft. In that year, Connecticut had 861 complaints of identity theft out of 3484 consumer complaints. Does this data provide enough evidence to show that Connecticut had a higher proportion of identity theft than 24% ? Test at the 10% level. State the hypotheses. Ho: P ?o Ha: P ?o Calculate the test statistic. Round to four decimal places. p= Calculate the standardized test statistic. Round to three decimal places. z = Find the p-value. Round to four decimal places. p-value= State your decision. Since the p-value is greater than .10, reject Ho Since the p-value is less than .10, fail to reject Ho. O Since the p-value is greater than .10, fail to reject Ho O Since the p-value is less than .10, reject Ho. Interpret the results. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%. At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is not equal to 24%. At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is not equal to 24%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%. O At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
![According to a report on consumer fraud and identity theft, 24% of all complaints for a year were for identity theft. In that year, Connecticut had 861 complaints of identity theft out of 3484 consumer complaints. Does this data provide enough evidence to show that Connecticut had a higher proportion of identity theft than 24%? Test at the 10% level.
**State the hypotheses:**
- \( H_0: p = \) [ ]
- \( H_a: p > \) [ ]
**Calculate the test statistic. Round to four decimal places.**
- \( \hat{p} = \) [ ]
**Calculate the standardized test statistic. Round to three decimal places.**
- \( z = \) [ ]
**Find the p-value. Round to four decimal places.**
- p-value = [ ]
**State your decision.**
- ○ Since the p-value is greater than .10, reject \( H_0 \).
- ○ Since the p-value is less than .10, fail to reject \( H_0 \).
- ○ Since the p-value is greater than .10, fail to reject \( H_0 \).
- ○ Since the p-value is less than .10, reject \( H_0 \).
**Interpret the results.**
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is not equal to 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is equal to 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F16eaad05-c857-4f7c-933f-0b1cc2121bed%2Fcbce98fc-618a-45f2-811b-04bacefe2bf0%2Ff1uliwa_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:According to a report on consumer fraud and identity theft, 24% of all complaints for a year were for identity theft. In that year, Connecticut had 861 complaints of identity theft out of 3484 consumer complaints. Does this data provide enough evidence to show that Connecticut had a higher proportion of identity theft than 24%? Test at the 10% level.
**State the hypotheses:**
- \( H_0: p = \) [ ]
- \( H_a: p > \) [ ]
**Calculate the test statistic. Round to four decimal places.**
- \( \hat{p} = \) [ ]
**Calculate the standardized test statistic. Round to three decimal places.**
- \( z = \) [ ]
**Find the p-value. Round to four decimal places.**
- p-value = [ ]
**State your decision.**
- ○ Since the p-value is greater than .10, reject \( H_0 \).
- ○ Since the p-value is less than .10, fail to reject \( H_0 \).
- ○ Since the p-value is greater than .10, fail to reject \( H_0 \).
- ○ Since the p-value is less than .10, reject \( H_0 \).
**Interpret the results.**
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is not equal to 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is more than 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is equal to 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%.
- ○ At the 10% level of significance, there is not enough evidence to show that the proportion of complaints due to identity theft in Connecticut is less than 24%.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 8 steps with 3 images
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman