A NSW couple leased an apartment for just over 12 months from an owner, who managed the property himself. During the tenancy, the couple carried out various modifications to the apartment with the owner’s consent, including the installation of light fittings, shelving and blinds. When the tenancy ended, the owner lodged an application to the NSW Civil & Administrative Tribunal, under section 69 of the NSW Residential Tenancies Act 2010, seeking compensation for the cost of rectification work required as a result of the alterations made to the property. At the hearing, the owner conceded that he had consented to any alterations, "as long as it adds value to the property". However, he was shocked when he discovered the extent of the alterations, and was now seeking compensation. The tenants replied that every alteration was made with the owner’s consent, and that he had even agreed to reimburse them for their expenses. What would the tribunal need to consider before making a determination?

A NSW couple leased an apartment for just over 12 months from an owner, who managed the property himself. During the tenancy, the couple carried out various modifications to the apartment with the owner’s consent, including the installation of light fittings, shelving and blinds. When the tenancy ended, the owner lodged an application to the NSW Civil & Administrative Tribunal, under section 69 of the NSW Residential Tenancies Act 2010, seeking compensation for the cost of rectification work required as a result of the alterations made to the property. At the hearing, the owner conceded that he had consented to any alterations, "as long as it adds value to the property". However, he was shocked when he discovered the extent of the alterations, and was now seeking compensation. The tenants replied that every alteration was made with the owner’s consent, and that he had even agreed to reimburse them for their expenses. What would the tribunal need to consider before making a determination?

Similar questions

Sam and Eleanor Gaito purchased a home from Howard Frank Auman, Jr., in the spring of 2011. Auman had completed the construction of the house in November 2006. In the interim, three different parties had lived in the house for brief periods, but Auman had retained ownership. The last tenants, the Ashleys, experienced difficulties with the home’s air conditioning system. Repairs were attempted, but no effort was made to change the capacity of the air conditioning unit. When the Gaitos moved into the house in June 2011, they too had problems with the air conditioning. The system created only a ten-degree difference between the outside and inside temperatures. The Gaitos complained to Auman on a number of occasions, but extensive repairs failed to correct the cooling problem. In May 2014, the Gaitos brought an action against Auman, alleging that the purchase price of the home included central air conditioning and that Auman had breached the implied warranty of habitability. At trial, an…
In what has been subsequently known as the 'narrow rule', the House of Lords found that a duty of care exist even if the defendant was not present. Accordingly, manufacturers of goods must take reasonable steps to ensure that their products do not cause injury to those that subsequently come into contact with them. Lord Atkin went on to propose a general maxim of law known as the 'neighbour principle' which would apply generally and preclude the claimant needing to bring the facts of their case within those of a previous case. REQUIRED: Concisely sets out what the claimant has to prove in order to succeed in an action in Negligence. 2. Comment on the situation where the chain of event is broken by an intervening cause.
Differentiate obligations arising from delict from obligations arising from quasi – delict.
Onslow Company purchased a used machine for $288,000 cash on January 2. On January 3, Onslow paid $8,000 to wire electricity to the machine. Onslow paid an additional $1,600 on January 4 to secure the machine for operation. The machine will be used for six years and have a $34,560 salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used. On December 31, at the end of its fifth year in operations, it is disposed of. Problem 8-6A (Algo) Part 3 3. Prepare journal entries to record the machine's disposal under each separate situation: (a) it is sold for $21,000 cash and (b) it is sold for $84,000 cash. View transaction list View journal entry worksheet No Date December 31 Cash Accumulated depreciation-Machinery Loss on sale of machinery Machinery General Journal Debit Credit 21,000 213,700 63,300 288,000 December 31 Cash 84,000 Accumulated depreciation-Machinery 213,700 Machinery 288,000
What was the ultimate outcome of the appeal to the High Court in DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423? Choose one of the following Mona Homes had properly terminated the contract. The contract was terminated by abandonment. The contract had not been terminated and was still binding DTR Nominees had properly terminated the contract.
Alan’s real estate broker suggested that he use a quitclaim deed to sell his super cool Brentwood condo so that the buyer would: Be the grantor under the deed and have full recourse against the seller for any title related claims Acquire only the legal interest in the property that Alan previously held Know that all prior mortgages, liens, and other encumbrances had either been reconveyed or removed from the property’s title Receive assurance that the property was free from any title defects
a WI Thi aw poin loqua yd olM : Jane was tired of living in the jungle with Tarzan and entered into a sales contract to purchase a small house from Tarzan that he had inherited. Tarzan later changed his mind, because he liked Jane swinging in the trees with him. If Jane decides to seek legal assistance to acquire the house, which remedy should she ask for? O Quantum meruit O Promissory estoppel O Specific performance O Legal ejectment dead art
Eric and Susan just purchased their first home, which cost $140,000. They purchased a homeowner’s policy to insure the home for $130,000 and personal property for $80,000. They declined any coverage for additional living expenses. The deductible for the policy is $500. Soon after Eric and Susan moved into their new home, a strong windstorm caused damage to their roof. They reported the roof damage to be $19,500. While the roof was under repair, the couple had to live in a nearby hotel for three days. The hotel bill amounted to $420. Assuming the insurance company settles claims using the replacement value method, what amount will the insurance company pay for the damages to the roof?
Natalie believes her cell phone company has been charging her exccesive fees under her cell phone contract. She wishes to sue the cell phone company. However, her contract states she must submit any legal claims arising out of the contract to the arbitation. The arbitrator is a former employee of the cell phone company. The arbitrator sides with the cell phone company and awatds damges to the cell phone company in the amount of $60,000. Can Natalie change the decision of the arbitrator in court?
Alan rents a flat in a block of units in the eastern suburbs of Sydney. One summer evening, during a balcony BBQ, Alan tosses several empty beer cans onto the adjoining balcony of the flat rented by Jimmy. What redress in law, if any, does Jimmy have?
A minor enters into a contract for the purchase of certain necessaries , in such case Question 8Answer a. he is liable to pay b. his guardian is liable to pay. c. he is not personally liable to pay d. his estate is liable to pay
Amanda and Emilia are co-directors and members of Griffin Pty Ltd, which imports widgets from Vietnam and sells them in various hardware stores in regional NSW. Griffin has a medium-sized warehouse where it stocks goods, and from which it distributes products. Griffin recently signed a contract to supply a large hardware store in Orange and Dubbo with widgets. So the company ordered 10 pallets of widgets from its Vietnamese supplier and also paid a substantial deposit. A shipping company who carries goods into Australia has already brought the pallets into the country and has sent their bill to Griffin. After a couple of deliveries to the hardware store, a safety issue is discovered with the widgets and the government bans the sale of the widgets. the hardware store cancels all further orders of the widgets. Now, Griffin has no future revenue and its remaining stock of widgets cannot be sold. The shipping company is demanding payment of its invoice; there are also several…