A company recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the company decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did no affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. The old WACC is 8.00% and the new WACC is 9.75% Year 1 2 Cash -$1,000 $41O $410 $410 flows

A company recently analyzed the project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the company decided to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates and therefore the firm's WACC. The Fed's action did no affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Note that a project's projected NPV can be negative, in which case it should be rejected. The old WACC is 8.00% and the new WACC is 9.75% Year 1 2 Cash -$1,000 $41O $410 $410 flows

Essentials Of Investments

11th Edition

ISBN:9781260013924

Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PS

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Cosmos Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value will be lost if the IRR method is used. WACC: 12.50% Year CFS CFL O $36.77 $61.03 O $48.85 O $24.80 0 1 2 3 4 $770 $780 -$2,050 $750 $760 -$4,300 $1,500 $1,518 $1,536 $1,554
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no conflict will exist. WACC: CFS CFL O a. $59.20 O b. $62.75 O c. $51.51 O d. $65.71 O e. $53.28 6.75% 0 -$1,025 -$1,025 1 $650 $100 2 $450 $300 3 $250 $500 4 $50 $700
Market Fresh Foods is evaluating a new project to determine whether it warrants funding consideration. Having just taken over managing the project initiation process for Market Fresh from the previous project controller, Ray Bones is trying to evaluate the project's potential given its projected cash flows. As a first step, Ray developed the table of investment and revenue estimates below that he plans to use to determine the project's net present value. Market Fresh's CFO has indicated that, based on assumptions about risk during the course of the project, Ray should initially use 0.15 as a discount rate, but use 0.14 beginning in year 6. Assume all cash flows occur at the end of the specified year and calculate all values to three decimal places. if the problem has table data, copy the following lines and paste into the appropriate spot in the text section\footnotesize \baselineskip = 12pt\begin{tabular}{c | c}Investment & Revenue \\ \hline12.4 & 0 \\ 15.8 & 0 \\ 17.5…
Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 14.25% 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$950 $500 $800 $0 $0 CFL -$2,100 $400 $800 $800 $1,000 G $93.62 $95.90 $127.87 $0.00 $116.46
20)
The payback method helps firms establish and identify a maximum acceptable payback period that helps in their capital budgeting decisions. Consider the case of Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc.: Blue Hamster Manufacturing Inc. is a small firm, and several of its managers are worried about how soon the firm will be able to recover its initial investment from Project Sigma’s expected future cash flows. To answer this question, Blue Hamster’s CFO has asked that you compute the project’s payback period using the following expected net cash flows and assuming that the cash flows are received evenly throughout each year. Complete the following table and compute the project’s conventional payback period. For full credit, complete the entire table. (Note: Round the conventional payback period to two decimal places. If your answer is negative, be sure to use a minus sign in your answer.) Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Expected cash flow -$6,000,000 $2,400,000 $5,100,000…
The payback method helps firms establish and identify a maximum acceptable payback period that helps in their capital budgeting decisions. Consider the case of Cold Goose Metal Works Inc.: Cold Goose Metal Works Inc. is a small firm, and several of its managers are worried about how soon the firm will be able to recover its initial investment from Project Beta’s expected future cash flows. To answer this question, Cold Goose’s CFO has asked that you compute the project’s payback period using the following expected net cash flows and assuming that the cash flows are received evenly throughout each year. Complete the following table and compute the project’s conventional payback period. For full credit, complete the entire table. (Note: Round the conventional payback period to the nearest two decimal places. If your answer is negative use a minus sign.) Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Expected cash flow -$4,500,000 $1,800,000 $3,825,000 $1,575,000 Cumulative…
An analysis of a proposal by the net present value method indicated that the present value of future cash inflows exceeded the amount to be invested. Which of the following statements best describes the results of this analysis? A)The proposal is undesirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal is less than the minimum rate used for the analysis. B)The proposal is desirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal exceeds the minimum rate used for the analysis. C)The proposal is undesirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal exceeds the minimum rate used for the analysis. D)The proposal is desirable, and the rate of return expected from the proposal is less than the minimum rate used for the analysis.
Devril plc is considering the investment in a project that has an initial cash outlay followed by a series of net cash inflows. The business applied the NPV and IRR methods to evaluate the proposal but, after the evaluation had been undertaken, it was found that the correct cost of capital figure was lower than that used in the evaluation. What will be the effect of correcting for this error on the NPV and IRR figures? a. NPV Increase IRR Decrease Ob. NPV Increase IRR Increase OC. NPV Decrease IRR Decrease d. NPV Decrease IRR No change Oe. NPV Increase IRR No Change Jump to... 1 Academic Integrity
Devril plc is considering the investment in a project that has an initial cash outlay followed by a series of net cash inflows. The business applied the NPV and IRR methods to evaluate the proposal but, after the evaluation had been undertaken, it was found that the correct cost of capital figure was lower than that used in the evaluation. What will be the effect of correcting for this error on the NPV and IRR figures? O a. NPV Increase IRR No Change O b. NPV Decrease IRR No change O c. NPV Decrease IRR Decrease O d. NPV Increase IRR Increase e. NPV Increase IRR Decrease
Last month, Company Z analyzed a project whose cash flows are shown below. However, before the decision to accept or reject the project, the Federal Reserve took actions that changed interest rates (and, therefore, the firm's WACC). The Fed's actions did not affect the forecasted cash flows. By how much did the change in the WACC affect the project's forecasted NPV? Old WACC 10.00% New WACC 7.00% Year 0 1 2 3 Cash Flow -1,100 600 600 600 Group of answer choices 115.47 65.98 103.10 0 (no change in NPV) 82.48
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $500,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $300,000 Year 2 –100,000 Year 3 450,000 Year 4 450,000 Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s WACC is 9%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 22.81% 18.25% 21.67% 20.53%

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS