BN11.2 (a) (b) (c)Case:• A beekeeper lives adjacent to an apple orchard.• The orchard owner benefits from the bees because each hive pollinates aboutone acre of apple trees.• The orchard owner pays nothing for this service, however, because the beescome to the orchard without his having to do anything.• Because there are not enough bees to pollinate the entire orchard, the orchardowner must complete the pollination by artificial means:o At a cost of $10 per acre of treeso Beekeeping has a marginal cost MC = 10 + 50,▪ where Q is the number of beehives.o Each hive yields $40 worth of honey.Questions:(a) How many beehives will the beekeeper choose to maintain?(b) Is this the economically efficient number of hives from the societal pointof view?(c) What could the orchard owner and/or the beekeeper do to produce a moreefficient operation?

When a firm produces a good sometimes it creates cost or benefits for other firms. If it is creating…

• A beekeeper lives adjacent to an apple orchard. • The orchard owner benefits from the bees because each hive pollinates about one acre of apple trees. • The orchard owner pays nothing for this service, however, because the bees come to the orchard without his having to do anything. • Because there are not enough bees to pollinate the entire orchard, the orchard owner must complete the pollination by artificial means:

• A beekeeper lives adjacent to an apple orchard. • The orchard owner benefits from the bees because each hive pollinates about one acre of apple trees. • The orchard owner pays nothing for this service, however, because the bees come to the orchard without his having to do anything. • Because there are not enough bees to pollinate the entire orchard, the orchard owner must complete the pollination by artificial means:

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

please help me with this question
6. Achieving lower pollution Suppose a political candidate criticizes a government pollution permit policy that she says lets corporations buy and sell the right to pollute. She argues that our right to breathe and the future of our planet require real regulation instead of this type of government policy. Which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with her statement? The environment is so important that it should be protected as much as possible, regardless of the cost. A free market in tradable pollution permits is typically more efficient than government regulation. A corrective tax would result in a more efficient outcome than either tradable permits or government regulation would. Clean air is a fundamental right, and government regulation will allow too much pollution.
A company near a large city is required to keep its smokestack pollution to new lower levels, costing the company $2 million in additional equipment (which will last at least 10 years) and $100,000 a year in additional labor. Lowering the air pollutants in the region is expected to save $4 million in medical expenses in the affected region over the next 10 years. What level of pollution reduction gives the smallest benefit for money spent? Select one: a. From 1-20% of pollution reduction b. From a 20-40% pollution reduction c. From a 80-100% pollution reduction d. From a 60-80% pollution reduction
please help me with this question
Suppose a municipality votes to reduce the combined pollution introduced by three local companies. Presently, each firm creates 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. The government can reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units by choosing between the following two methods:Methods to Reduce Pollution1. The government imposes pollution standards using regulation.2. The government issues tradable pollution permits.The costs faced by each firm are different, so it is more difficult for some firms to reduce pollution than others. The following table shows the cost faced by each firm to eliminate each unit of pollution. Assume that the cost of eliminating all 4 units of pollution (that is, reducing pollution to zero) is prohibitively expensive for all three firms.FirmCost of Eliminating the...First Unit of PollutionSecond Unit of PollutionThird Unit of Pollution(Dollars)(Dollars)(Dollars)Firm A 130 165 220Firm B 600 750 1,200Firm C…
Use the model of environmental pollution to model the following changes in a polluting industry to: i) the socially optimal level of pollution; ii) the total abatement costs; and ii) the total damage costs (а) A new technology is invented that allows firms to reducе pollution associated with each level of production output. (b) The government announces a new commitnment to more strictly enforce current environmental regulations. (c) A new study finds the pollutant in question to be more carcinogenic than originally thought.
8.1 Suppose we have an agricultural valley 100 km by 50 km, with a polluting electricity power plant. The power plant causes pollution problems in a narrow strip of land downwind of the plant, and within this valley. 10 km in length and 500 m in width, but no problems outside of that area. The total effect of the pollution is to make crop land less productive. If we were to clean up the pollution, would we expect land prices to increase? Where? Would we expect wages to decline? Would the changes in land prices and/or wages fully reflect the benefits of cleaning up the pollution? Why or why not?
Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
None
The town of Chefsmeadow has 100 residents. Each resident has a car. Each car produces $30 worth of pollution per person. In other words, each person in the town breathes in $30 worth of air pollution harm from one person's car as that person drives around the town. Thus each car produces $3,000 worth of air pollution overall ($30 per person x 100 people = $3,000 total harm). Because there are 100 cars, the total dollar estimate of all the pollution harm caused by all the cars is $300,000.There is a device called a "Polluteaway" that can be installed in a car and cuts its air pollution in half. The device costs $1,000 to buy and install. For the following questions, you can assume each person cares only about the air pollution they breathe and not that others have to breathe. Remember, write the number of the question in front of your answer in the text submission box. 1. What is the dollar gain or loss to one individual (let's call him Fred) in buying and installing a Polluteaway in…
Two countries the US (U) and Fiji (F). Each country i E {U, F} can decide whether to impose a positive tax on the emissions of its polluting firms (t¡> 0) or to impose no tax (t; = 0). We can think of a representative firm that chooses whether to produce using a polluting technology (q = P) or a clean technology (q = C). The polluting technology generates profits of л(P) = 11. The clean technology generates profits of л(P) = 10 and doesn't have to pay tax. Assume that when the firm is indifferent between the two technologies, it chooses the clean technology. Imposing a tax of t = 1, profits of firms using polluting technology would equal profits of firms using clean technology. Let us now turn to the decisions that the governments would make if they were inde- pendently choosing whether to impose a tax or not. In the US, firms using the clean technology emit a total of 0 tonnes of CO2 emissions, while firms using the polluting technology emit a total of 900 tonnes of CO2 emissions. In…
Suppose a lake enjoyed by three homeowners is cleaned up to the socially efficient level of pollution by splitting the cost of cleanup equally among the three homeowners. 1. Describe a situation where at least one homeowner would be made worse off by this cleanup policy. 2. In the situation you described above, is there an alternative way to allocate costs that would avoid this problem? 3. What are the barriers, if any, to achieving this alternative? (250 words or fewer.)