Suppose the figure to the right illustrates the marginal cost and marginal benefit from reducing sulfur dioxide pollution. How could the government use a command-and-control approach to reduce pollution to the optimal level for society? The government could O A. tax each ton of sulfur dioxide pollution. OB. reduce transaction costs to encourage private solutions to the problems associated with sulfur dioxide pollution. OC. subsidize each ton of sulfur dioxide pollution. OD. limit sulfur dioxide pollution to a particular quantity per year. OE. prohibit sulfur dioxide pollution entirely. Suppose the government requires each firm to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by an equal amount such that total emissions are reduced by 10.0 million tons per year. Is this approach necessarily economically efficient? This command-and-control approach OA. is not efficient because some firms may still be generating pollution. OB. is efficient because it does not require the government to know the firms' cost of reducing pollution. OC. is efficient because reducing sulfur dioxide pollution by 10.0 million tons per year is where the marginal cost and marginal benefit of pollution reduction are equal. OD. is efficient because each firm is reducing pollution by the same amount. OE. is not efficient because firms can have different costs of reducing pollution. Cost or benefit (dollars per ton) 400- 375 350- 325 300- 275- 250 225- 200- 175 150+ 126 o 125 100- 75- 50- 25- Marginal cost G Marginal benefit 0- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions (mil tons per year)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Note: The solution written by hand is not accepted.
=
Suppose the figure to the right illustrates the marginal cost and marginal benefit from reducing sulfur
dioxide pollution. How could the government use a command-and-control approach to reduce
pollution to the optimal level for society?
The government could
O A. tax each ton of sulfur dioxide pollution.
OB. reduce transaction costs to encourage private solutions to the problems associated with
sulfur dioxide pollution.
OC. subsidize each ton of sulfur dioxide pollution.
OD. limit sulfur dioxide pollution to a particular quantity per year.
O E. prohibit sulfur dioxide pollution entirely.
Suppose the government requires each firm to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by an equal amount
such that total emissions are reduced by 10.0 million tons per year. Is this approach necessarily
economically efficient?
This command-and-control approach
OA. is not efficient because some firms may still be generating pollution.
OB. is efficient because it does not require the government to know the firms' cost of reducing
pollution.
OC. is efficient because reducing sulfur dioxide pollution by 10.0 million tons per year is where
the marginal cost and marginal benefit of pollution reduction are equal.
O D. is efficient because each firm is reducing pollution by the same amount.
OE. is not efficient because firms can have different costs of reducing pollution.
6
400
375
350-
325
300-
275-
250-
225-
200-
175
150
8 125
100-
75
50-
25-
Marginal cost
Marginal benefit
0-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions (mil tons per year)
Transcribed Image Text:= Suppose the figure to the right illustrates the marginal cost and marginal benefit from reducing sulfur dioxide pollution. How could the government use a command-and-control approach to reduce pollution to the optimal level for society? The government could O A. tax each ton of sulfur dioxide pollution. OB. reduce transaction costs to encourage private solutions to the problems associated with sulfur dioxide pollution. OC. subsidize each ton of sulfur dioxide pollution. OD. limit sulfur dioxide pollution to a particular quantity per year. O E. prohibit sulfur dioxide pollution entirely. Suppose the government requires each firm to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by an equal amount such that total emissions are reduced by 10.0 million tons per year. Is this approach necessarily economically efficient? This command-and-control approach OA. is not efficient because some firms may still be generating pollution. OB. is efficient because it does not require the government to know the firms' cost of reducing pollution. OC. is efficient because reducing sulfur dioxide pollution by 10.0 million tons per year is where the marginal cost and marginal benefit of pollution reduction are equal. O D. is efficient because each firm is reducing pollution by the same amount. OE. is not efficient because firms can have different costs of reducing pollution. 6 400 375 350- 325 300- 275- 250- 225- 200- 175 150 8 125 100- 75 50- 25- Marginal cost Marginal benefit 0- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions (mil tons per year)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Cost of Taxation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education