A 0.020-kg bullet traveling at a speed of embeds in a 1.0-kg wooden block resting on a horizontal surface. The block slides horizontally 4.0 m on a surface before stopping. Determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and surface.

College Physics
11th Edition
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Chapter1: Units, Trigonometry. And Vectors
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CQ: Estimate the order of magnitude of the length, in meters, of each of the following; (a) a mouse, (b)...
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

A 0.020-kg bullet traveling at a speed of embeds in a 1.0-kg wooden block resting on a horizontal surface. The block slides horizontally 4.0 m on a surface before stopping. Determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and surface.

I know the solution is to first use 1) M1V1 + 0 = (M1+M2) Vf1 to get Vf1 = 5.9m/s
Then use 2) net force = force of friction to get Uk

However I'm confused why I couldn't use p + J = p for the second part after I got Vf1. In which case I would have (m1+m2)Vf1 + Ff*d = 0,
(m1+m2)Vf1 = (m1+m2)g *Uk *d
Uk = Vf1/gd

When I use this I get 0.15, which is the wrong answer. The right answer is 0.44. Can you help me identify the mistake in my logic? or if this is a way i could use but I'm just missing pieces? Thank you so much.

Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question

Solve this using momentum and not conservation of energy:

A 0.020-kg bullet traveling at a speed of embeds in a 1.0-kg wooden block resting on a horizontal surface. The block slides horizontally 4.0 m on a surface before stopping. Determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and surface.

I know the solution is to first use 1) M1V1 + 0 = (M1+M2) Vf1 to get Vf1 = 5.9m/s
Then use 2) net force = force of friction to get Uk

However I'm confused why I couldn't use p + J = p for the second part after I got Vf1. In which case I would have (m1+m2)Vf1 + Ff*d = 0,
(m1+m2)Vf1 = (m1+m2)g *Uk *d
Uk = Vf1/gd

When I use this I get 0.15, which is the wrong answer. The right answer is 0.44. Can you help me identify the mistake in my logic? or if this is a way I could use but I'm just missing pieces? Thank you so much.

Solution
Bartleby Expert
SEE SOLUTION
Knowledge Booster
Impulse
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
College Physics
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:
9781305952300
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
University Physics (14th Edition)
University Physics (14th Edition)
Physics
ISBN:
9780133969290
Author:
Hugh D. Young, Roger A. Freedman
Publisher:
PEARSON
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
Physics
ISBN:
9781107189638
Author:
Griffiths, David J., Schroeter, Darrell F.
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:
9781337553278
Author:
Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Lecture- Tutorials for Introductory Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:
9780321820464
Author:
Edward E. Prather, Tim P. Slater, Jeff P. Adams, Gina Brissenden
Publisher:
Addison-Wesley
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Editio…
Physics
ISBN:
9780134609034
Author:
Randall D. Knight (Professor Emeritus), Brian Jones, Stuart Field
Publisher:
PEARSON