54 54 56 58 58 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 66 66 66 67 67 67 67 68 68 70. 14.46) Table 14.1 provides the heights of a random sample of 93 female undergraduate students at the university of California at Irvine. Assuming that heights in this undergraduate population are normal with standar deviation o= 2.5 inches, do the data provide evidence that the mean height of all female undergraduate students at
54 54 56 58 58 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 66 66 66 67 67 67 67 68 68 70. 14.46) Table 14.1 provides the heights of a random sample of 93 female undergraduate students at the university of California at Irvine. Assuming that heights in this undergraduate population are normal with standar deviation o= 2.5 inches, do the data provide evidence that the mean height of all female undergraduate students at
54 54 56 58 58 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 66 66 66 67 67 67 67 68 68 70. 14.46) Table 14.1 provides the heights of a random sample of 93 female undergraduate students at the university of California at Irvine. Assuming that heights in this undergraduate population are normal with standar deviation o= 2.5 inches, do the data provide evidence that the mean height of all female undergraduate students at
14.46) Table 14.1 provides the heights of a random sample of 93 female undergraduate students at the university of California at Irvine. Assuming that heights in this undergraduate population are normal with standar deviation o= 2.5 inches, do the data provide evidence that the mean height of all female undergraduate students at UC-Irvine is different from the mean height of 64.5 inches of all young women in the United States? Follow the four-step process as ilustatrated in Example 14.9.
Definition Definition Measure of central tendency that is the average of a given data set. The mean value is evaluated as the quotient of the sum of all observations by the sample size. The mean, in contrast to a median, is affected by extreme values. Very large or very small values can distract the mean from the center of the data. Arithmetic mean: The most common type of mean is the arithmetic mean. It is evaluated using the formula: μ = 1 N ∑ i = 1 N x i Other types of means are the geometric mean, logarithmic mean, and harmonic mean. Geometric mean: The nth root of the product of n observations from a data set is defined as the geometric mean of the set: G = x 1 x 2 ... x n n Logarithmic mean: The difference of the natural logarithms of the two numbers, divided by the difference between the numbers is the logarithmic mean of the two numbers. The logarithmic mean is used particularly in heat transfer and mass transfer. ln x 2 − ln x 1 x 2 − x 1 Harmonic mean: The inverse of the arithmetic mean of the inverses of all the numbers in a data set is the harmonic mean of the data. 1 1 x 1 + 1 x 2 + ...
Expert Solution
Step 1
Given :
Claim : The mean height of all female undergraduate students at UC-Irvine is different from the mean height of 64.5 inches of all young women in the United States.