4. tch-up effect Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2018 and 2068. Physical Capital Year (Tools per worker) 2018 11 2068 16 Physical Capital Year (Tools per worker) 2018 8 2068 13 Hermes Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 1,800 2,160 Gribinez Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Productivity (Gobs per worker) Output Productivity (Gobs of goo) (Gobs per worker) 900 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Gribinez. From 2018 to 2068, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by a amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates the effect

4. tch-up effect Consider the economies of Hermes and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2018 and 2068. Physical Capital Year (Tools per worker) 2018 11 2068 16 Physical Capital Year (Tools per worker) 2018 8 2068 13 Hermes Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 1,800 2,160 Gribinez Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Productivity (Gobs per worker) Output Productivity (Gobs of goo) (Gobs per worker) 900 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Hermes than in Gribinez. From 2018 to 2068, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Hermes to rise by a amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates the effect

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Solve all this question compulsory....
6.5 Exercises Exercise 6.1 (Technological Progress and Long-Run Growth). Consider a Solow economy with population growth and technological progress. The evolution of the capital stock per efficiency unit of labor, denoted k1, is given by the law of motion (1+n)(1+ g)kt+1 = (1 – 8)kt +of(kt). Capital per efficiency unit of labor is defined as k, = Kt/(LEt), where Kt denotes the stock of physical capital, L, denotes population, and E is a tech- nological factor. Population grows at the rate n and the technological factor grows at the rate g. The subscript t denotes time, measured in years. The parameters d E (0, 1) and o > 0 denote, respectively, the depreciation rate of capital and the savings rate. The function f(k;) represents the produc- tion technology. Specifically, let Y, denote output and yt = Yt/(LEt) denote output per efficiency unit of labor. Then yt = f(kt). Assume that f(kt) = /k. 1. Find the steady-state stock of capital per efficiency unit of labor, de- noted k*, as a…
Please do fast ... ASAP... Fast
The table below shows data over several years for a country's real GDP, the number of full-time employed workers (E), and the annual average number of hours worked per worker (H). a. & b. For each of the four years, compute real GDP per worker-a standard measure of labour productivity and a slightly more complex measure of labour productivity-real GDP per hour worked. (Round your answers to the nearest cent.) Year 1 5 10 15 Real GDP $525 billion $574 billion $655 billion $767 billion Full-time Employed Workers (E) 12.7 million 13.5 million 14.5 million 15.2 million Number of Hours Worked per Worker (H) 2011 1961 1937 1905 GDP E GDP EXH
4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Sporon and Tralfamadore, both of which produce gaggles of gop using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2018 and 2068. Sporon Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) (Gaggles of gop) (Gaggles per worker) 2018 11 30 1,800 2068 16 30 2,160 Tralfamadore Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) (Gaggles of gop) (Gaggles per worker) 2018 8 30 900 2068 13 30 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Sporon than in Tralfamadore. From 2018 to 2068, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Sporon…
4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Blahnik and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2019 and 2069. Year 2019 2069 Year 2019 2069 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 11 16 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 8 13 Blahnik Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 1,800 2,160 Gribinez Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 900 1,620 Productivity (Gobs per worker) Productivity (Gobs per worker) Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Blahnik than in Gribinez. From 2019 to 2069, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates The 5-unit change in capital per worker…
Question 22 Here are hypothetical data for Germany and Japan on average labor productivity, the number of persons employed, and population in a given year: Average labor |productivity S88,204 $44,216 Number of persons employed 32.36 million 50.48 million than that of Germany by approximately . Population 78.17 million 104.3 million Germany Japan Japan's real GDP per person is O lower; $15,114 O higher; $121,711 O lower; $121,711 O higher; $15,114