4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Sporon and Tralfamadore, both of which produce gaggles of gop using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2018 and 2068. Sporon Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) (Gaggles of gop) (Gaggles per worker) 2018 11 30 1,800 2068 16 30 2,160 Tralfamadore Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) (Gaggles of gop) (Gaggles per worker) 2018 8 30 900 2068 13 30 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Sporon than in Tralfamadore. From 2018 to 2068, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Sporon to rise by a amount than productivity in Tralfamadore. This illustrates the effect.

4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Sporon and Tralfamadore, both of which produce gaggles of gop using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2018 and 2068. Sporon Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) (Gaggles of gop) (Gaggles per worker) 2018 11 30 1,800 2068 16 30 2,160 Tralfamadore Physical Capital Labor Force Output Productivity Year (Tools per worker) (Workers) (Gaggles of gop) (Gaggles per worker) 2018 8 30 900 2068 13 30 1,620 Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Sporon than in Tralfamadore. From 2018 to 2068, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. The 5-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Sporon to rise by a amount than productivity in Tralfamadore. This illustrates the effect.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2
Consider the hypothetical economies of Thalassa and Pelheim, both of which produce cases of argo using only workers and tools. Suppose that, during the course of 25 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 4 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2018 and 2043. Physical Capital Year (Tools per worker) 2018 13 2043 17 Year 2018 2043 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 10 14 Thalassa Labor Force (Workers) 60 60 Output (Cases of argo) 6,000 7,200 Pelheim Labor Force (Workers) 60 60 Output (Cases of argo) 4,800 7,200 Productivity (Cases per worker) Productivity (Cases per worker) Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Thalassa than in Pelheim. From 2018 to 2043, capital per worker rises by 4 units in each country. The 4-unit change in capital per worker causes productivity in Thalassa to rise by a amount…
Only typed solution
Help with part D.
Answer the given question with a proper explanation and step-by-step solution.
Please no written by hand and graph Consider a small world that consists of two different countries, a developed and a developing country. In both countries, assume that the production function takes the following form: Y = F (K, LE) = K¹/4 (LE) 3/4, where Y is output, K is capital stock, L is total employment and E is labour augmenting technology. (a) Does this production function exhibit constant returns to scale in K and L? Explain. (b) Express the above production function in its intensive form (i.e., output per-effective worker y as a function of capital per effective worker k). (c) Solve for the steady-state value of y as a function of saving rate s, population growth rate n, technological progress g, and capital depreciation rate 6. (d) The developed country has a savings rate of 30% and a population growth rate of 2% per year. Meanwhile, the developing country has a savings rate of 15% and population growth rate of 5% a year. Technology evolves at the rate of 8% and 2% in…
4. The catch-up effect Consider the economies of Blahnik and Gribinez, both of which produce gobs of goo using only tools and workers. Suppose that, during the course of 50 years, the level of physical capital per worker rises by 5 tools per worker in each economy, but the size of each labor force remains the same. Complete the following tables by entering productivity (in terms of output per worker) for each economy in 2019 and 2069. Year 2019 2069 Year 2019 2069 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 11 16 Physical Capital (Tools per worker) 8 13 Blahnik Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 1,800 2,160 Gribinez Labor Force (Workers) 30 30 Output (Gobs of goo) 900 1,620 Productivity (Gobs per worker) Productivity (Gobs per worker) Initially, the number of tools per worker was higher in Blahnik than in Gribinez. From 2019 to 2069, capital per worker rises by 5 units in each country. amount than productivity in Gribinez. This illustrates The 5-unit change in capital per worker…