### Transcription for Educational Context---**Problem 4: Global Environmental Issues and the Prisoner’s Dilemma**Consider the scenario of international environmental problems treated as a prisoner’s dilemma, as discussed in the chapter on Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Imagine two countries, A and B. Each country must decide whether to protect the environment, incurring a cost of 10, or to refrain, incurring no cost. If one country chooses to protect the environment, the total benefit is 16, split equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, the benefit rises to 32, divided equally between them.The table below outlines the costs, benefits, and payoffs for these decisions. | | Country B: Protect | Country B: Not Protect ||-------------|--------------------|------------------------|| **Country A**: Protect | | || **Country A**: Not Protect | | |**Task:**- Fill in the table with the specific costs, benefits, and total payoffs for each country based on their actions.- Discuss why, in the absence of an international agreement, neither country might opt to protect the environment.**Analysis:**This exercise is a classic representation of how mutual cooperation can lead to better outcomes for both parties involved, yet the lack of guaranteed reciprocity can prevent countries from taking beneficial actions, like protecting the environment.**Diagram Explanation:**The table is set up as a matrix displaying the strategic options available to Countries A and B. Each cell represents a possible outcome based on each country's choice to protect or not protect the environment, setting up a framework to examine the implications of individual vs. mutual action.---

The benefits, cost & the total payoff can be mentioned as:

4. Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner's dilemma of the sort studied in the Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly chapter. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two countries. In the following table, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment. Country B Protect Not Protect Protect Country A Not Protect

4. Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner's dilemma of the sort studied in the Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly chapter. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two countries. In the following table, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment. Country B Protect Not Protect Protect Country A Not Protect

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2. In this question we will combine a very simplified model of an externality that has long-lasting impacts with the model of discounted utility that we learned in our game theory topic. Consider a hypothetical environmental externality: produced as the byproduct of industrial activity, each unit of emission of a pollutant that is emitted once, today, causes $10 of external harm to society each and every year, starting immediately, forever. Let's say that policymakers apply a discount factor of 8 € (0, 1) to future gains and losses, in an analog of the discounted utility model except for cash payoffs rather than utilities. What would the socially efficient Pigouvian tax on the emission of this pollutant be if we applied a discount factor of (i) 8 = 0.5, (ii) 6 = 0.9, and (iii) 8 = 0.99? Give an intuitive explanation of how to interpret the parameter & in this context, and explain precisely but in simple terms what the goal and effect of the Pigouvian tax would be.
please answer the below in detail
6-It is illegal and unethical to download and install a pirated copy of Microsoft Office on your own laptop. Select one : True O False
Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars) Firm X 130 165 220…
2. In this question we will combine a very simplified model of an externality that has long-lasting impacts with the model of discounted utility that we learned in our game theory topic. Consider a hypothetical environmental externality: produced as the byproduct of industrial activity, each unit of emission of a pollutant that is emitted once, today, causes $10 of external harm to society each and every year, starting immediately, forever. Let's say that policymakers apply a discount factor of 8 € (0, 1) to future gains and losses, in an analog of the discounted utility model except for cash payoffs rather than utilities. What would the socially efficient Pigouvian tax on the emission of this pollutant be if we applied a discount factor of (i) 8 = 0.5, (ii) 6 = 0.9, and (iii) 8 = 0.99? Give an intuitive explanation of how to interpret the parameter & in this context, and explain precisely but in simple terms what the goal and effect of the Pigouvian tax would be.
46.In long-run equilibrium, the marginal social cost exceeds the marginal private cost, but the marginal social benefit is equal to the marginal private benefit. This describes which of the following markets? Oligopoly with no externalities Monopoly with perfect information Perfect competition with a positive externality Perfect competition with a negative externality Perfect competition with asymmetric information
Consider the following decision by two countries: a small country (C1) and a large country (C2). When both countries cooprate and agree to an environmental agreement, C1 receives 4 and C2 receives 5 units of benefit. When they do not cooperae, they incur costs of -1, and -2, respectively. The payoffs associated with other outcomes are described in the table below. Large country (C2) Agree to environmental protection (cooperate) Do not agree to environmental protection (do not cooperate) The Socially Optiomal outcome is The Nash Equilibrium is Agree to environmental protection (cooperate) C1:4 C2: 5 C1: 2 C2: 6 [Choose ] Small country (C1) [Choose ] Do not agree to environmental protection (do not cooperate) C1:2 C2: -3 C1: -1 C2: -2
17. Which of the following is an example of specific reciprocity? Group of answer choices (pick one) A.The US government thinks the Paris Climate accord is a bad deal, so it withdraws B.The European Union is unhappy that the US raised tariffs on steel, so it retaliates with tariffs on Harley-Davidson C.motorcycles and Kentucky bourbon D.For many years, WTO members refused to admit Russia to the WTO because its trade history suggested it was an unreliable trading partner E.All of the above F.None of the above
4. When handling insects, knowing where the pests are thickest can help save on insecticide usage. But scounting for bugs also comes at a price. Determine the appropriate blend of insect scouting and insecticide to manage your insect issues on the farm. Complete the following worksheet considering the different strategies for soybean production and answer the accompanying questions. The price of insect scouting is $30 per hour and insecticide is $6 per quart. Strategy Scounting (hours) Insecticide (quarts) Input Substitution Ratio Input Price Ratio 1,200 40 600 80 300 D. 120 120 (a) What economic question/opportunity does this address? What is the appropriate decision rule for input substitution? What does that rule to seek to achieve (be more specific than saying "profit maximization")? (b) What is the profit maximizing strategy? What is the cost associated with that strategy? (c) Explain how the input price ratio will change if both input prices decrease from the initial scenario by…
3. If certain apple growers are using a cancer-causing pesticide on apple trees, explain how the harm caused by the pesticide can be internalized? How will the market equilibrium change?
3. Some have argued that diversity in communities and schools leads to positive externalities. What implications does this view have for the efficiency of a Tiebout equilibrium? What implications does it have for government policy?
2. There are four firms in the widget market. Each of them emits five units of yuck, which are not currently regulated by the government. Each firm's total cost of abatement (cleaning up its yuck emissions) is listed in the table below. The government has just passed a new law limiting the total amount of allowable yuck to 10 units (for the entire industry). a. How much should each firm abate and why? Keep in mind that total emissions cannot exceed 10. b. What is the industry's total cost of abatement based on your allocation in a)? 0 1 2 3 4 Total cost of abatement 62 42 28 16 6 95 54 27 13 5 76 49 34 21 10 99 58 27 8 1 54 30 18 9 3 Each firm's total yuck emissions Firm A Firm B Firm C Firm D Firm E