Refer to the graph to answer this question.Explain the Lorenz Curve. 10090Lorenz curve for equalincome distribution1968807020186040302020Percentage of households11

Answered: 100 90 Lorenz curve for equal income…

100 90 Lorenz curve for equal income distribution 1968 80 70 2018 60 50 40 30 20 10 20 40 60 80 100 Percentage of households Percentage of income

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter28: The Distribution Of Income And Poverty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following table with individuals in a country and their incomes: Individuals Income 1 15 30 4 45 55 6 70 7 85 8. 100 115 10 130 Total 650 O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 3.5. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 7.3. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 4.3. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 6.5.
What is the approximate Gini coefficient associated with the following income distribution? Household Percentile 0.23 0.08 0.68 0.48 0.13 20th 40th 60th 80th 100th Share of Income 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.25 0.40 Cumulative Share of Income 0.05 0.15 0.35 0.60 1.00
Suppose there is an economy where 80 percent ofpeople earn more than their parents and 40 percentend up in a different income quintile than theirparents. What measure of the income distributiondoes the first statistic tell you about? What aboutthe second?
What type of variable is 'social support', as reported in the world happiness report?
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Calculate the share of total income each quintile of this income distribution received. Do the top and bottom quintiles in this distribution have a greater or larger share of total income than the top and bottom quintiles of the U.S. income distribution for 2005?
The table below shows information about the distribution of income in two countries. The rows are labeled "deciles" which are like percentiles but for groups of 10% instead of 1% of the population. The 1St decile is the poorest 10%, for example, while the 10th decile is the richest 10%. Coruscant Naboo cumulative income cumulative income decile income share share income share share 1st 2.29% 2.29% 3.12% 3.12% 2nd 3.93% 6.22% 4.50% 7.62% 3rd 5.30% 11.52% 5.69% 13.31% 4th 6.56% 18.08% 6.80% 20.11% 5th 7.81% 25.89% 7.91% 28.02% 6th 9.14% 35.04% 9.11% 37.13% 7th 10.69% 45.73% 10.52% 47.65% 8th 12.71% 58.44% 12.37% 60.02% 9th 15.94% 15.32% 10th 25.61% 24.66% mean income = 50,000 35,000 What is the cumulative income share for the bottom 9 deciles in Naboo?
The following table gives the distribution of the income of the employees of a company Calculate the cumulative percentage of 2000 income. Calculate the Gini coefficient
SLO-4.1. The amount of money people have to spend after buying necessities such as food, clothing and housing is Osavings Odiscretionary income Onet income Ogross income
What is calculation of Herfindahl-Hirschman Index
How has the distribution of household types inthe United States been changing? What are theimplications of these shifts?
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to overall utility in the economy? Would it increase, decrease, or remain the same? Explain your answer. (Hint: does the marginal utility of income diminish as one earns more?)
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 If $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner, would that increase or decrease the share of income held by the top quintile? Would this transfer increase or decrease the share of income held by the bottom quintile? Would this have any effect on the 2nd quintile? The 3rd? The 4th? Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to overall utility in the…