**Section 1.6: Analyzing the Cournot Duopoly Model**In this section, we examine the Cournot duopoly model where the inverse demand function is expressed as $ P(Q) = a - Q $. However, in this scenario, the firms face asymmetric marginal costs: $ c_1 $ for Firm 1 and $ c_2 $ for Firm 2. **Study Objectives:**1. **Nash Equilibrium with Symmetric Conditions:** - Determine the Nash equilibrium given that $ 0 < c_i < a/2 $ for each firm.2. **Nash Equilibrium with Asymmetric Conditions:** - Explore the Nash equilibrium when $ c_1 < c_2 < a $ but also $ 2c_2 > a + c_1 $.These conditions will help us to understand how the differences in marginal costs affect the strategic decisions and the Nash equilibrium outcome in a duopolistic market setting.

An industrial structure where businesses compete on the volume of output they will generate, which…

- 1.6. Consider the Cournot duopoly model where inverse demand is P(Q) = a − Q but firms have asymmetric marginal costs: c₁ for firm 1 and c²₂ for firm 2. What is the Nash equilibrium if 0 < c; < a/2 for each firm? What if c₁ < c₂ a+q₁₂₁?

- 1.6. Consider the Cournot duopoly model where inverse demand is P(Q) = a − Q but firms have asymmetric marginal costs: c₁ for firm 1 and c²₂ for firm 2. What is the Nash equilibrium if 0 < c; < a/2 for each firm? What if c₁ < c₂ a+q₁₂₁?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

E1 Find Bertrand equilibrium and its outputs for the following asymmetric duopoly:q 1(p1, p2) = 16 - p1 + 0.5 p2, C1(q1) = 4q1;q 2(p1, p2) = 16 + 0.5 p1 - p2, C2(q2) = 6q2.(Note that the average and marginal costs are: AC1=MC1 = c1 = 4, AC2=MC2 = c2 = 6)
Suppose that there are two firms producing a homogenous product and competing in Cournot fashion and let the market demand be given by Q = 360-- Assume for simplicity that each firm operates with zero total cost. Suppose that two firms collude. How much more profit each firm can obtain relative to Cournot competition? 8000 14400 7200 16000
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
8. Suppose there are two identical firms in an industry who compete by setting quantities. The output of firm 1 is denoted by q1 and that of firm 2 is denoted by 92. Each firm faces a constant marginal cost of 3. Let Q denote total output, 1.e. Qq1 +42. The inverse demand curve in the market is given by P-15-Q (a) Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium quantity produced by each firm and the market price. (b) If the firms could collude, what would be the total output in the mar- ket? Assuming each firm produces half of the collusive output, what is the profit of each firm?
Consider a Bertrand oligopoly where two firms (Firms 1 and 2) sell goods that are imperfectsubstitutes and compete by choosing prices simultaneously. Their market demands areq!= 1,200 − 3/2p!+ 3/2p", q"= 800 − 2p"+ 1/2p!For simplicity, assume the marginal cost is zero for both firms (MC!= MC"= 0). Find the bestresponse curve of each firm. Which of the following alternatives is correct?(a) Firm 1’s best response curve is p!= 400 + 0.5p"(b) Firm 2’s best response curve is p"= 400 + 0.5p!(c) Firm 1’s best response curve is q!= 45 − 0.5q"(d) Firm 2’s best response curve is q"= 200 + 0.8p! Then, find the optimal price and quantity of each firm.Hint: Start by finding the Nash equilibrium, that is, the combination of mutual best responses.Which of the following alternatives is correct?(a) For firm 1, p!= $1,600/3 and q!= 800/3(b) For firm 1, p!= $800 and q!= 1,600/3(c) For firm 2, p"= $800 3⁄ and q"= 1,600/3(d) For firm 2, p"= $1,600 and q"= 800 key: !=1 "=2
Correct answers in the picture. Please upload working
Consider duopoly model with firm 1 and firm 2. Firms have constant marginal costs, c_1 = c_2 = 10. Demand functions are given by equations: Q_1= (7*100) - 2*P_1 + P_2 Q_2 = (7*100) + P_1 - 2*P_ 2 Note that * signifies the multiplication sign. Assume that firm 1 chooses its price first. Then, after observing firm 1’s price, firm 2 chooses its price. Find the prices each firm chooses in the roll-back equilibrium of this game. Is it good to be a leader or a follower in this game? Why?
Answer neatly with proper explanation of each option given. Thank you
1. Perloff Chapter 14, Exercise 3.13 3.13 A duopoly faces an inverse market demand function of p = 120 - Q. Firm 1 has a constant marginal cost of 20. Firm 2's constant marginal cost is 40. Calculate the output of each firm, market output, and price in (a) a collusive equilibrium or (b) a Nash-Cournot equilibrium. (Hint: See Solved Problem 14.10.) M
2. Consider a standard Cournot triopoly model, i.e., inverse demand p(Q) = a - bQ, where Q = -19i and a, b>0, output cost function ci(qi) = cqi for i = 1, 2, 3, c> 0. qi (a) Find the symmetric equilibrium output (q*), price (p*), and profit levels (*). (b) Suppose that firms 1 and 3 merge horizontally, i.e., form a single larger firm, call it firm 1, and compete against firm 2 as in a Cournot duopoly. The newly formed firm 1 and firm 2 have identical cost functions, which are the ci(qi) discussed above, and face the same inverse market demand p(Q). Assume that firm 1 and firm 3 split equilibrium profits. Find for i = 1, 2, 3 and compare with part (a). Are firm 1 and firm 3 better-off after the merge?
The market demand curve for mineral water is given by P=20 - Q. If there are two firms that produce mineral water, each with a constant marginal cost of 8 per unit, fill in the entries for each of the four duopoly models indicated in the table. (In the Stackelberg model, assume that firm 1 is the leader.) Instructions: Round your answers to 1 decimal place. Model Shared monopoly Cournot Bertrand Stackelberg 21 4.5 92 4.5 01 + 0₂ P 11 1 ग 2 π 1+ 2
11. Suppose there is a duopoly of two identical firms, A and B, facing a market inverse demand of P = 140 – 0.5Q, and cost functions of CA = 20QA and Cg = 20QB respectively. a. Find the Cournot-Nash equilibrium and profit for each firm. b. Suppose that A acts as the leader in a Stackelberg model and B responds. What are the respective quantities and profits of each firm now? Is it advantageous to move first? c. If the firms were able to collude, how much additional profit could they earn if they switch from simple single pricing to perfect price discrimination? d. Graph and label equilibria on the inverse demand.