1.1.1 According to the source, mention two ways, in which the Tri-cameral system denied black people their rights as citizens of South Africa. 1.1.2 Name two methods of mass mobilisation used by the UDF during its protest campaign against the Tri- cameral system, as mentioned in the source.

icon
Related questions
Question
▼ SOURCE 1A
An extract explaining the Tri-cameral system and opposition to it.
In 1982, the president of South Africa, PW Botha, proposed a "new deal". He wanted what he called a "Tri-
cameral Parliament". People classified as Coloured, Indian or white would vote separately for racially
segregated houses of Parliament. The white Parliament would be the most powerful. Those classified as
Africans would never be considered citizens of South Africa. They would vote only in the so-called
independent homelands. In black townships, people would only be allowed to vote for local councillors, and
these would fall under the Bantu Administration Board. Only the white electorate was allowed to vote on this
deal or "new Constitution", and they ended up voting in favour of it.
In response, the UDF launched the "Million Signatures" campaign to get people to sign a petition against the
deal. Allan Boesak, then president of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, said: "We cannot accept a
'new deal' that makes apartheid work even better. We cannot accept a future for our people when we had no
say in it."
The UDF and its affiliates denounced and rejected candidates for Indian and coloured parliaments. They called
for a boycott of these elections for the (coloured) House of Representatives and the (Indian) House of
Delegates. Countrywide, fewer than 10% of the Indians and coloureds eligible to vote actually cast a vote.
Transcribed Image Text:▼ SOURCE 1A An extract explaining the Tri-cameral system and opposition to it. In 1982, the president of South Africa, PW Botha, proposed a "new deal". He wanted what he called a "Tri- cameral Parliament". People classified as Coloured, Indian or white would vote separately for racially segregated houses of Parliament. The white Parliament would be the most powerful. Those classified as Africans would never be considered citizens of South Africa. They would vote only in the so-called independent homelands. In black townships, people would only be allowed to vote for local councillors, and these would fall under the Bantu Administration Board. Only the white electorate was allowed to vote on this deal or "new Constitution", and they ended up voting in favour of it. In response, the UDF launched the "Million Signatures" campaign to get people to sign a petition against the deal. Allan Boesak, then president of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, said: "We cannot accept a 'new deal' that makes apartheid work even better. We cannot accept a future for our people when we had no say in it." The UDF and its affiliates denounced and rejected candidates for Indian and coloured parliaments. They called for a boycott of these elections for the (coloured) House of Representatives and the (Indian) House of Delegates. Countrywide, fewer than 10% of the Indians and coloureds eligible to vote actually cast a vote.
Refer to Source 1A
1.1.1 According to the source, mention two ways, in
which the Tri-cameral system denied black people
their rights as citizens of South Africa.
1.1.2 Name two methods of mass mobilisation used by
the UDF during its protest campaign against the Tri-
cameral system, as mentioned in the source.
Transcribed Image Text:Refer to Source 1A 1.1.1 According to the source, mention two ways, in which the Tri-cameral system denied black people their rights as citizens of South Africa. 1.1.2 Name two methods of mass mobilisation used by the UDF during its protest campaign against the Tri- cameral system, as mentioned in the source.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer