Can you please write the following in different words with different paraphrasing? In what respects was it different? The three civilizations also had many differences (p259 – p 274). While the Mayans and Aztec lived in a more humid environment, the Incas lived in mountains with a drier climate. Their habitats affected the trajectory the empires grew. The wetter climate enabled a more successful agriculture economy for the Mayans and Aztecs. The Mayans engaged in slash-and-burn farming, the Incas in terrace farming, and the Aztecs in chinampa farming. The surplus of food and the relative flat terrine of the regions allowed the Mayans and Aztecs to trade with neighbors. Trade enriched both empires. The Incas, on the other hand, had much less trading due to the mountain barriers. But the Incas were skillful road builders since they needed to construct good road for settlement and access to other tribes for military conquests. The Aztec and Incas empires were also warrior societies and they engaged in frequent warfare to expand their territories and collect tributes from tributary states. The Mayas were relatively peaceful compared to the other two; they devoted much of their time and energy to mathematics and astronomy. With respect to the political structure, the Mayans were a group of sovereign states each with its own king; however, the Aztecs and Incas had a unified kingdom with one supreme ruler. The demise of the empires was caused by different factors: a drought plunged the Mayan into a great famine while the Aztecs and Incas were conquered by the Spanish. Part 2: Hernan Cortez Cortez’s use of absolutes and hyperboles in describing the wealth of Temixtitlan’s makes his description less credible. He exaggerated the size in the description that “one square [was] twice as large as that of the city Salamanca,” overstated the amount of commercial activity in the market claiming that the market has “all kinds of merchandise that the world affords”, and inflated the size of the market by saying that “every kind of merchandise is sold in a particular street or quarter assigned to it exclusively. “ Although the Aztec was an advanced civilization in her time, it was a civilization localized in Mesoamerica that had no prior contact with Europe or the Far East. It did not have goods such as camel pelt found in African or jujube found in China. So, it was misleading writing by Cortez to describe Temixtitlan as rich as it he had written. However, if one knew that Cortez intended the letter for justification for conquering the city, one would understand his style and might even agreed he had achieved his purpose by his inflated descriptions.
Can you please write the following in different words with different paraphrasing?
In what respects was it different?
The three civilizations also had many differences (p259 – p 274). While the Mayans and Aztec lived in a more humid environment, the Incas lived in mountains with a drier climate. Their habitats affected the trajectory the empires grew. The wetter climate enabled a more successful agriculture economy for the Mayans and Aztecs. The Mayans engaged in slash-and-burn farming, the Incas in terrace farming, and the Aztecs in chinampa farming. The surplus of food and the relative flat terrine of the regions allowed the Mayans and Aztecs to trade with neighbors. Trade enriched both empires. The Incas, on the other hand, had much less trading due to the mountain barriers. But the Incas were skillful road builders since they needed to construct good road for settlement and access to other tribes for military conquests. The Aztec and Incas empires were also warrior societies and they engaged in frequent warfare to expand their territories and collect tributes from tributary states. The Mayas were relatively peaceful compared to the other two; they devoted much of their time and energy to mathematics and astronomy. With respect to the political structure, the Mayans were a group of sovereign states each with its own king; however, the Aztecs and Incas had a unified kingdom with one supreme ruler. The demise of the empires was caused by different factors: a drought plunged the Mayan into a great famine while the Aztecs and Incas were conquered by the Spanish.
Part 2: Hernan Cortez
Cortez’s use of absolutes and hyperboles in describing the wealth of Temixtitlan’s makes his description less credible. He exaggerated the size in the description that “one square [was] twice as large as that of the city Salamanca,” overstated the amount of commercial activity in the market claiming that the market has “all kinds of merchandise that the world affords”, and inflated the size of the market by saying that “every kind of merchandise is sold in a particular street or quarter assigned to it exclusively. “ Although the Aztec was an advanced civilization in her time, it was a civilization localized in Mesoamerica that had no prior contact with Europe or the Far East. It did not have goods such as camel pelt found in African or jujube found in China. So, it was misleading writing by Cortez to describe Temixtitlan as rich as it he had written. However, if one knew that Cortez intended the letter for justification for conquering the city, one would understand his style and might even agreed he had achieved his purpose by his inflated descriptions.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
