1. What type of claim is used in the text from the Facebook? From the Journal? 2. What is the claim presented by the Facebook netizen? Write one sentence claim. What is the claim presented by the researcher? 3. Which claim do you believe? The source from Facebook or the source from journal? Why? 4. What should you do to prove the truthfulness of a claim?
1. What type of claim is used in the text from the Facebook? From the Journal? 2. What is the claim presented by the Facebook netizen? Write one sentence claim. What is the claim presented by the researcher? 3. Which claim do you believe? The source from Facebook or the source from journal? Why? 4. What should you do to prove the truthfulness of a claim?
Related questions
Question
![Find out how the claims will affect your belief. Will it create a change on what you know?
CLAIM FROMA FACEBOOK POST
CLAIM FROM A JOURNAL
Abstract
The Japanese professor of physiology or medicine, Professor
Dr Tasuku Honjo, caused a sensation today in the media by
saying that the corona virus is not natural. If it is natural, it will transmittable and pathogenic viral infection caused by severe
not have affected the whole world like that. Because,
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is a highly
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2),
depending on the nature, the temperature is different in which emerged in Wuhan, China and spread around the
different countries. If it was natural, it would only have affected world. Genomic analysis revealed that SARS-COV-2 is
countries with the same temperature as China. Instead, it phylogenetically related to
spreads to a country like Switzerland, the same way it spreads syndrome-like (SARS-like) bat viruses, therefore bats could be
to desert areas. Whereas if it was natural, it would have spread the possible primary reservoir. The intermediate source of
in cold places, but would have died in hot places. I have done origin and transfer to humans is not known, however, the
40 years of research on animals and viruses. It is not natural. It rapid human to human transfer has been confirmed widely.
is manufactured and the virus is completely artificial. I have
been working for 4 years in the Wuhan laboratory in China. I
know all the staff of this laboratory well. I called them all after available to be used against COVID-19. However, few broad-
the Corona accident. But, all of their phones have been dead spectrum antiviral drugs have been evaluated against COVID-
for 3 months. It is now understood that all of these laboratory
severe acute respiratory
There is no clinically approved antiviral drug or vaccine
19 in clinical trials, resulted in clinical recovery. In the current
review, we summarize and comparatively analyze the
technicians are dead.
emergence and pathogenicity of COVID-19 infection and
Based on all of my knowledge and research to date, I can say previous human coronaviruses severe acute respiratory
this with 100% confidence that Corona is not natural. It did not syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and middle east
come from bats. China made it. If what I say today turns out to respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). We also
be false now or even after I die, the government can withdraw discuss the approaches for developing effective vaccines and
my Nobel Prize. But China is lying and this truth will one day be therapeutic combinations to cope with this viral outbreak.
revealed to all. PLEASE FORWARD TO THE LARGEST NUMBER
SO THAT THE GUILTY MUST PAY WHAT HAPPENS TO US ALL!!!!
Source: https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113610/
Source:https://www.facebook.com/62188827209/posts/10158379823252210
1. What type of claim is used in the text from the Facebook? From the Journal?
2. What is the claim presented by the Facebook netizen? Write one sentence claim.
What is the claim presented by the researcher?
3. Which claim do you believe? The source from Facebook or the source from journal? Why?
4. What should you do to prove the truthfulness of a claim?](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F59e9697e-e570-473f-be02-4b36f207ef53%2F21cfa7af-0ba3-4f84-ab82-8ca46ef28b43%2F92ow9uyi_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Find out how the claims will affect your belief. Will it create a change on what you know?
CLAIM FROMA FACEBOOK POST
CLAIM FROM A JOURNAL
Abstract
The Japanese professor of physiology or medicine, Professor
Dr Tasuku Honjo, caused a sensation today in the media by
saying that the corona virus is not natural. If it is natural, it will transmittable and pathogenic viral infection caused by severe
not have affected the whole world like that. Because,
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is a highly
acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2),
depending on the nature, the temperature is different in which emerged in Wuhan, China and spread around the
different countries. If it was natural, it would only have affected world. Genomic analysis revealed that SARS-COV-2 is
countries with the same temperature as China. Instead, it phylogenetically related to
spreads to a country like Switzerland, the same way it spreads syndrome-like (SARS-like) bat viruses, therefore bats could be
to desert areas. Whereas if it was natural, it would have spread the possible primary reservoir. The intermediate source of
in cold places, but would have died in hot places. I have done origin and transfer to humans is not known, however, the
40 years of research on animals and viruses. It is not natural. It rapid human to human transfer has been confirmed widely.
is manufactured and the virus is completely artificial. I have
been working for 4 years in the Wuhan laboratory in China. I
know all the staff of this laboratory well. I called them all after available to be used against COVID-19. However, few broad-
the Corona accident. But, all of their phones have been dead spectrum antiviral drugs have been evaluated against COVID-
for 3 months. It is now understood that all of these laboratory
severe acute respiratory
There is no clinically approved antiviral drug or vaccine
19 in clinical trials, resulted in clinical recovery. In the current
review, we summarize and comparatively analyze the
technicians are dead.
emergence and pathogenicity of COVID-19 infection and
Based on all of my knowledge and research to date, I can say previous human coronaviruses severe acute respiratory
this with 100% confidence that Corona is not natural. It did not syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and middle east
come from bats. China made it. If what I say today turns out to respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). We also
be false now or even after I die, the government can withdraw discuss the approaches for developing effective vaccines and
my Nobel Prize. But China is lying and this truth will one day be therapeutic combinations to cope with this viral outbreak.
revealed to all. PLEASE FORWARD TO THE LARGEST NUMBER
SO THAT THE GUILTY MUST PAY WHAT HAPPENS TO US ALL!!!!
Source: https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7113610/
Source:https://www.facebook.com/62188827209/posts/10158379823252210
1. What type of claim is used in the text from the Facebook? From the Journal?
2. What is the claim presented by the Facebook netizen? Write one sentence claim.
What is the claim presented by the researcher?
3. Which claim do you believe? The source from Facebook or the source from journal? Why?
4. What should you do to prove the truthfulness of a claim?
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)