(1) An enzyme catalyzes a reaction in which substrate A is cleaved into two products, P and Q. In the catalytic mechanism, the enzyme converts A to an covalently-bound reaction intermediate X and product P, P then desorbs from the enzyme, and in a second chemical step, the enzyme converts the intermediate X in the EX complex to the final product Q (in EQ), which then desorbs from the enzyme E. k3 k7 k1 k9 ks E A EA E Q EXP EX EQ k2 k4 kg You discover two inhibitors of this enzyme, I and J. I is a competitive inhibitor of the substrate A, and has nearly double the molecular weight of J. On the other hand, J is a mixed inhibitor of enzyme E, and its inhibitory effect on Km/ Vmax (the slope effect from the double reciprocal plot) is greater than that of 1/Vmax (the intercept effect in a double reciprocal plot). That is Kis < Kji At low pH, the conversion of EX to EQ is greatly slowed, kcat is decreased, and the intercept effect of inhibitor J is elevated, that is, the value of Ki is diminished. When a high, fixed concentration of product P is added to the enzymatic reaction, the inhibition due to inhibitor I is unchanged, but inhibitor J becomes a competitive inhibitor vs. A. (1) To which enzyme forms do I and J bind? Explain how you got there. I cannot bind when A is at a concentration of infinity (no intercept effect). I is competitive vs. A and therefore binds to E. I may structurally resemble substrate A Jis a mixed inhibitor; it exerts both a slope effect and an intercept effect, but the slope effect is more significant than the intercept effect: Kis< Kji. J probably binds to E twice: to E to form EJ, which gives rise to the slope effect, and the intercept effects comes from binding to EA, or a downstream complex such as EXP, EX, or EQ. J has structural features similar to I, which is why it can bind to E, but is smaller than Iand can fit into another pocket during catalysis At low pH, chemical steps are slowed, especially the conversion of EX > EQ, and inhibition arises from the intercept effect becomes tighter. This must mean that the [EX] at low pH increases, it piles up because its breakdown is slowed, and it allows more binding of J to EX to make EXJ. Addition of P to the reaction prevents the effect of J on the intercept effect of the mixed inhibition, because the EX complex is converted to EXP, and J can no longer bind to EX, but it may still bind to E I binds to E. J binds to E and also to EX, but better binding to E I and J both resemble substrate A, but since J is smaller than I, it fits into the substrate-binding site of E on the "P" side of the substrate binding site. (2) What is the likely rate-limiting step for this enzyme? Explain. Since J has an effect on the intercept effect of inhibition, and it was shown that it must bind to the EX complex, then the conversion of EX => EQ is the slowest step in the reaction. (3) Since the enzyme E cleaves substrate A into two products, P and Q, which inhibitor has the most structural resemblance to A?. Of the three ligands A, P, and Q, which does/do J structurally resemble? Explain is more like A than J. I is also like both P and Q, but J is like P.

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question

An enzyme catalyzes a reaction in which substrate A is cleaved into two products, P and Q. In the catalytic mechanism, the enzyme converts A to an covalently-bound reaction intermediate X and product P, P then desorbs from the enzyme, and in a second chemical step, the enzyme converts the intermediate X in the EX complex to the final product Q (in EQ), which then desorbs from the enzyme E. You discover two inhibitors of this enzyme, I and J. I is a competitive inhibitor of the substrate A, and has nearly double the molecular weight of J. On the other hand, J is a mixed inhibitor of enzyme E, and its inhibitory effect on Km / Vmax (the slope effect from the double reciprocal plot) is greater than that of 1 / Vmax (the intercept effect in a double reciprocal plot). That is Kis < Kii .

At low pH, the conversion of EX to EQ is greatly slowed, kcat is decreased, and the intercept effect of inhibitor J is elevated, that is, the value of Kii is diminished.

When a high, fixed concentration of product P is added to the enzymatic reaction, the inhibition due to inhibitor I is unchanged, but inhibitor J becomes a competitive inhibitor vs. A.

(1) To which enzyme forms do I and J bind? Explain how you got there.

I cannot bind when A is at a concentration of infinity (no intercept effect). I is competitive vs. A and therefore binds to E. I may structurally resemble substrate A. J is a mixed inhibitor; it exerts both a slope effect and an intercept effect, but the slope effect is more significant than the intercept effect: Kis < Kii. J probably binds to E twice: to E to form EJ, which gives rise to the slope effect, and the intercept effects comes from binding to EA, or a downstream complex such as EXP, EX, or EQ. J has structural features similar to I, which is why it can bind to E, but is smaller than I and can fit into another pocket during catalysis.

At low pH, chemical steps are slowed, especially the conversion of EX => EQ, and inhibition arises from the intercept effect becomes tighter. This must mean that the [EX] at low pH increases, it piles up because its breakdown is slowed, and it allows more binding of J to EX to make EXJ.

Addition of P to the reaction prevents the effect of J on the intercept effect of the mixed inhibition, because the EX complex is converted to EXP, and J can no longer bind to EX, but it may still bind to E.

I binds to E. J binds to E and also to EX, but better binding to E.

I and J both resemble substrate A, but since J is smaller than I, it fits into the substrate-binding site of E on the “P” side of the substrate binding site.

(2) What is the likely rate-limiting step for this enzyme? Explain. Since J has an effect on the intercept effect of inhibition, and it was shown that it must bind to the EX complex, then the conversion of EX => EQ is the slowest step in the reaction.

(3) Since the enzyme E cleaves substrate A into two products, P and Q, which inhibitor has the most structural resemblance to A?. Of the three ligands A, P, and Q, which does/do J structurally resemble? Explain. I is more like A than J. I is also like both P and Q, but J is like P.

(1)
An enzyme catalyzes a reaction in which substrate A is cleaved into two products, P and Q. In
the catalytic mechanism, the enzyme converts A to an covalently-bound reaction intermediate
X and product P, P then desorbs from the enzyme, and in a second chemical step, the enzyme
converts the intermediate X in the EX complex to the final product Q (in EQ), which then desorbs
from the enzyme E.
k3
k7
k1
k9
ks
E A
EA
E Q
EXP
EX
EQ
k2
k4
kg
You discover two inhibitors of this enzyme, I and J.
I is a competitive inhibitor of the substrate A, and
has nearly double the molecular weight of J. On the other hand, J is a mixed inhibitor of enzyme E, and
its inhibitory effect on Km/ Vmax (the slope effect from the double reciprocal plot) is greater than that of
1/Vmax (the intercept effect in a double reciprocal plot). That is Kis < Kji
At low pH, the conversion of EX to EQ is greatly slowed, kcat is decreased, and the intercept effect of
inhibitor J is elevated, that is, the value of Ki is diminished.
When a high, fixed concentration of product P is added to the enzymatic reaction, the inhibition due to
inhibitor I is unchanged, but inhibitor J becomes a competitive inhibitor vs. A.
(1) To which enzyme forms do I and J bind?
Explain how you got there.
I cannot bind when A is at a concentration of infinity (no intercept effect). I is competitive vs. A and
therefore binds to E. I may structurally resemble substrate A
Jis a mixed inhibitor; it exerts both a slope effect and an intercept effect, but the slope effect is
more significant than the intercept effect: Kis< Kji.
J probably binds to E twice: to E to form EJ, which gives rise to the slope effect, and the intercept
effects comes from binding to EA, or a downstream complex such as EXP, EX, or EQ. J has structural
features similar to I, which is why it can bind to E, but is smaller than Iand can fit into another
pocket during catalysis
Transcribed Image Text:(1) An enzyme catalyzes a reaction in which substrate A is cleaved into two products, P and Q. In the catalytic mechanism, the enzyme converts A to an covalently-bound reaction intermediate X and product P, P then desorbs from the enzyme, and in a second chemical step, the enzyme converts the intermediate X in the EX complex to the final product Q (in EQ), which then desorbs from the enzyme E. k3 k7 k1 k9 ks E A EA E Q EXP EX EQ k2 k4 kg You discover two inhibitors of this enzyme, I and J. I is a competitive inhibitor of the substrate A, and has nearly double the molecular weight of J. On the other hand, J is a mixed inhibitor of enzyme E, and its inhibitory effect on Km/ Vmax (the slope effect from the double reciprocal plot) is greater than that of 1/Vmax (the intercept effect in a double reciprocal plot). That is Kis < Kji At low pH, the conversion of EX to EQ is greatly slowed, kcat is decreased, and the intercept effect of inhibitor J is elevated, that is, the value of Ki is diminished. When a high, fixed concentration of product P is added to the enzymatic reaction, the inhibition due to inhibitor I is unchanged, but inhibitor J becomes a competitive inhibitor vs. A. (1) To which enzyme forms do I and J bind? Explain how you got there. I cannot bind when A is at a concentration of infinity (no intercept effect). I is competitive vs. A and therefore binds to E. I may structurally resemble substrate A Jis a mixed inhibitor; it exerts both a slope effect and an intercept effect, but the slope effect is more significant than the intercept effect: Kis< Kji. J probably binds to E twice: to E to form EJ, which gives rise to the slope effect, and the intercept effects comes from binding to EA, or a downstream complex such as EXP, EX, or EQ. J has structural features similar to I, which is why it can bind to E, but is smaller than Iand can fit into another pocket during catalysis
At low pH, chemical steps are slowed, especially the conversion of EX > EQ, and inhibition arises
from the intercept effect becomes tighter. This must mean that the [EX] at low pH increases, it piles
up because its breakdown is slowed, and it allows more binding of J to EX to make EXJ.
Addition of P to the reaction prevents the effect of J on the intercept effect of the mixed inhibition,
because the EX complex is converted to EXP, and J can no longer bind to EX, but it may still bind to E
I binds to E. J binds to E and also to EX, but better binding to E
I and J both resemble substrate A, but since J is smaller than I, it fits into the substrate-binding site
of E on the "P" side of the substrate binding site.
(2) What is the likely rate-limiting step for this enzyme? Explain. Since J has an effect on the
intercept effect of inhibition, and it was shown that it must bind to the EX complex, then the
conversion of EX => EQ is the slowest step in the reaction.
(3) Since the enzyme E cleaves substrate A into two products, P and Q, which inhibitor has the
most structural resemblance to A?. Of the three ligands A, P, and Q, which does/do J
structurally resemble? Explain
is more like A than J. I is also like both P and Q, but J is like P.
Transcribed Image Text:At low pH, chemical steps are slowed, especially the conversion of EX > EQ, and inhibition arises from the intercept effect becomes tighter. This must mean that the [EX] at low pH increases, it piles up because its breakdown is slowed, and it allows more binding of J to EX to make EXJ. Addition of P to the reaction prevents the effect of J on the intercept effect of the mixed inhibition, because the EX complex is converted to EXP, and J can no longer bind to EX, but it may still bind to E I binds to E. J binds to E and also to EX, but better binding to E I and J both resemble substrate A, but since J is smaller than I, it fits into the substrate-binding site of E on the "P" side of the substrate binding site. (2) What is the likely rate-limiting step for this enzyme? Explain. Since J has an effect on the intercept effect of inhibition, and it was shown that it must bind to the EX complex, then the conversion of EX => EQ is the slowest step in the reaction. (3) Since the enzyme E cleaves substrate A into two products, P and Q, which inhibitor has the most structural resemblance to A?. Of the three ligands A, P, and Q, which does/do J structurally resemble? Explain is more like A than J. I is also like both P and Q, but J is like P.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Enzyme kinetics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780815344322
Author:
Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781260159363
Author:
Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9781260231700
Author:
Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:
McGraw Hill Education